TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 1, 2005

Assessment of a Probabilistic Scheme for Flood Prediction

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 2

Abstract

This study presents the development of a probabilistic discharge prediction scheme based on an uncertainty framework called generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE). By being explicit about a hydrologic model’s parameter uncertainty, historical data is used adaptively on a storm-to-storm basis to derive ensembles of representative parameter sets, along with the corresponding likelihood weights of discharge prediction quantiles. The quantile with highest likelihood weight represents the most probable discharge hydrograph, with upper/lower uncertainty limits represented by the various upper/lower likelihood weight quantiles. On the basis of new data, the Bayesian theorem is used to update for the posterior representative parameter sets and likelihood weights of prediction quantiles. The probabilistic scheme is evaluated using 15 flood-inducing storms over a medium-sized watershed in northern Italy. The scheme’s discharge predictions on the basis of its highest likelihood quantile are evaluated comparatively to the conventional single optimum parameter set prediction. It is observed that the two methods have comparable accuracy in terms of the overall hydrograph prediction, but the probabilistic scheme is subject to 50% less variability in time to peak error. The probabilistic scheme has an added value important to decision making and risk assessment, which is its ability to provide consistent assessment of uncertainty in such major flood parameters as peak runoff and time-to-peak. The procedure is simple in design, model-independent, and can be easily implemented in real-time for computationally efficient rainfall-runoff models.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers wish to thank Dr. Marco Borga of the University of Padua, Legarno, Italy, for providing the watershed and storm data for this study. This study was supported by a grant from NSF-Geosciences (EAR-0132942). The first writer was supported by a NASA Earth System Science Graduate Student Fellowship.

References

Bates, B. C., and Campbell, E. P. (2001). “A Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme for parameter estimation and inference in conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling.” Water Resour. Res., 37(4), 937–947.
Beven, K. J., and Binley, A. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Proc., 6, 279–298.
Beven, K. J., and Kirkby, M. J. (1979). “A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology.” Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 24(1), 43–69.
Beven, K. J., and Freer, J. (2001). “Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 249, 11–29.
Beven, K. J., Lamb, R., Quinn, P., Romanowicz, R., and Freer, J. (1995). “TOPMODEL.” Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resource Publication, Fort Collins, Colo., 627–668.
Borga, M., Anagnostou, E. N., and Frank, E. (2000). “On the use of real-time radar rainfall estimates for flood prediction in mountainous basins.” J. Geophys. Res., 105(D2), 2269–2280.
Day, G. N. (1985). “Extended streamflow forecasting using NWSRFS.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 111(2), 157–170.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1992). “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res., 28(4), 1015–1031.
Fisher, J. I., and Beven, K. J. (1996). “Modelling of streamflow at Slapton Wood using TOPMODEL within an uncertainty estimation framework.” Field Studies, 8, 577–584.
Franks, S. W., and Beven, K. J. (1997). “Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in land surface-atmospheric flux predictions.” J. Geophys. Res., 102(D20), 23991–23999.
Franks, S. W., Beven, K. J., and Gash, J. H. C. (1998). “On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: the incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process.” Water Resour. Res., 34, 787–797.
Freer, J., Beven, K. J., and Ambroise, B. (1996). “Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of the GLUE approach.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2161–2173.
Georgakakos, K. P. (1987). “Real-time flash flood prediction.” J. Geophys. Res., 92(D8), 94–158.
Hossain, F., Anagnostou, E. N., Borga, M., and Dinku, T. (2004a). “Hydrologic model sensitivity to parameter and radar rainfall estimation uncertainty.” Hydrolog. Process., 18(17), 3277–3291.
Hossain, F., Anagnostou, E. N., and Dinku, T. (2004b). “Sensitivity analyses of passive microwave and IR retrieval and sampling on flood prediction uncertainty for a medium sized watershed.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 42(1), 130–139.
Kelly, K. S., and Krzysztofowicz, R. (1994). “Probability distributions for flood warning systems.” Water Resour. Res., 30(4), 1145–1152.
Kitanidis, P. K., and Bras, R. L. (1980). “Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 1. Analysis of uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 16(6), 1025–1033.
Krzysztofowicz, R. (1999). “Bayesian Theory of Probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model.” Water Resour. Res., 35(9), 2739–2750.
Krzysztofowicz, R., and Reese, S. (1991). “Bayesian analyses of seasonal runoff forecasts.” Stochastic Hydrol. Hydr., 5(4), 295–322.
Kuczera, G., and Parent, E. (1998). “Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: The Metropolis algorithm.” J. Hydrol., 211, 69–85.
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. (1979). “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245.
Murphy, A. H., and Carter, G. M. (1980). “On the comparative evaluation of objective and subjective precipitation probability forecasts in terms of economic value.” 8th Conf. on Weather Forecasting and Analysis, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 478–187.
Quinn, P. F., Beven, K. J., Chevallier, P., and Planchon, O. (1991). “The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models.” Hydrol. Proc., 5, 59–79.
Quinn, P. F., Beven, K. J., and Lamb, R. (1995). “The ln(atanβ) index: how to calculate it and how to use it in the TOPMODEL framework.” Hydrol. Proc., 9, 161–182.
Romanowicz, R., Beven, K. J., and Tawn, J. (1994). “Evaluation of predictive uncertainty in nonlinear hydrological models using Bayesian approach.” Statistics for the environment. II. Water related issues, V. Barnett and K. F. Turkman, eds., Wiley, Chichester, U.K., 297–317.
Schaake, J. C., and Larson, L. (1998). “Ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP): Progress and research needs.” In preprints of Special Symposium on Hydrology, J19–J24, American Meteorological Society, Boston.
Schaake, J. C., Welles, E., and Graziano, T. (2001). “Comment of ‘Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic model,’ by Roman Krzysztofowicz.” Water Resour. Res., 37(2), 439.
Seo, D. J., Perica, S., Welles, E., and Schaake, J. C. (2000). “Simulation of precipitation fields from probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecast.” J. Hydrol., 239, 203–229.
Shorter, J. A., and Rabitz, H. A. (1997). “Risk analysis by the guided Monte Carlo technique.” J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 57, 321–336.
Spear, R. C., Grieb, T. M., and Shang, N. (1994). “Parameter uncertainty and interaction in complex environmental models.” Water Resour. Res., 30, 3159–3170.
Spear, R. C., and Hornberger, G. M. (1980). “Eutrophication in Peel Inlet, II, Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 4, 43–49.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 10Issue 2March 2005
Pages: 141 - 150

History

Received: Sep 8, 2003
Accepted: Apr 29, 2004
Published online: Mar 1, 2005
Published in print: Mar 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Faisal Hossain, M.ASCE [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tennessee Technological Univ. Cookeville, TN 38505-0001. E-mail: [email protected]
Emmanouil N. Anagnostou, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Rd., U 2037, Storrs, CT 06269 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share