Climate-Biased Storm-Frequency Estimation
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 4
Abstract
Storm frequencies for the future are often estimated directly from past historical records of sufficient length. The estimation requires no detailed knowledge of the area's meteorology, but presumes it is unchanged in the future. However, the climate seldom remains static. Numerous climate forecasts of meteorological probabilities over extended periods are now available. It is possible to use these meteorological forecasts directly in the estimation of storm frequencies from the historical record. A heuristic approach is defined here to estimate storm frequencies that recognize forecasts of extended weather probabilities. Basically, those groups of historical meteorological record segments matching forecast meteorological probabilities are weighted more than others, during the estimation of storm frequencies. (Affiliated groups of hydrologic record segments may be similarly weighted for hydrological estimation; e.g., flood frequency estimation.) An example of frequency estimation is made for maximum annual daily flow, using currently available agency meteorological forecasts in the United States and Canada.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chow, V. T. ( 1964). Handbook of applied hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 8–29.
2.
Croley, T. E., II ( 1996). Using NOAA's new climate outlooks in operational hydrology. J. Hydrologic Engrg., ASCE, 1(3), 93–102.
3.
Croley, T. E., II ( 1997a). “Water resource predictions from meteorological probability forecasts.” Proc., Sustainability of Water Resour. under Increasing Uncertainty (Proc. Rabat Symp.), IAHS Publication No. 240, D. Rosbjerg et al., eds., IAHS Press, Wallingford, U.K., 301–309.
4.
Croley, T. E., II (1997b). “Mixing probabilistic meteorology outlooks in operational hydrology.”J. Hydrologic Engrg., ASCE, 2(4), 161–168.
5.
Croley, T. E., II. ( 2000a). Using meteorology probability forecasts in operational hydrology, ASCE, Reston, Va.
6.
Croley, T. E. ( 2000b). “Climate-corrected Storm-Frequency Examples.” NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL GLERL-118, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, Mich.
7.
Day, G. N. (1985). “Extended streamflow forecasting using NWSRFS.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 111(2), 157–170.
8.
Hillier, F. S., and Lieberman, G. J. ( 1969). “Chapter 5: Linear programming.” Introduction to Operations Research, Holden-Day, San Francisco, 127–171.
9.
Ingram, J. J., Hudlow, M. D., and Fread, D. L. ( 1995). “Hydrometeorological coupling for extended streamflow predictions.” Preprints of Conf. on Hydrology, 75th Annu. Meeting of the Am. Meteorological Soc., American Meteorology Society, Dallas, 186–191.
10.
Koutrouvelis, I. A., and Canavos, G. C. ( 1999). “Estimation in the Pearson type 3 distribution.” Wat. Resour. Res., 35(9), 2693–2704.
11.
Pfeiffer, P. E. ( 1965). Concepts of probability theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
12.
Smith, J. A., Day, G. N., and Kane, M. D. (1992). “Nonparametric framework for long-range streamflow forecasting.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 118(1), 82–92.
13.
U.S. Water Resources Council (USWRC). ( 1967). “A uniform technique for determining flood-flow frequency.” Bull. 15, Hydrology Committee, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Dec 22, 1999
Published online: Aug 1, 2001
Published in print: Aug 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.