Evaluation of Flash-Flood Discharge Forecasts in Complex Terrain Using Precipitation
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 4
Abstract
Operational prediction of flash floods produced by thunderstorm (convective) precipitation in mountainous areas requires accurate estimates or predictions of the precipitation distribution in space and time. The details of the spatial distribution are especially critical in complex terrain because the watersheds are generally small in size, and small position errors in the forecast or observed placement of the precipitation can distribute the rain over the wrong watershed. In addition to the need for good precipitation estimates and predictions, accurate flood prediction requires a surface-hydrologic model that is capable of predicting stream or river discharge based on the precipitation-rate input data. Different techniques for the estimation and prediction of convective precipitation will be applied to the Buffalo Creek, Colorado flash flood of July 1996, where over 75 mm of rain from a thunderstorm fell on the watershed in less than 1 h. The hydrologic impact of the precipitation was exacerbated by the fact that a significant fraction of the watershed experienced a wildfire approximately two months prior to the rain event. Precipitation estimates from the National Weather Service's operational Weather Surveillance Radar–Doppler 1988 and the National Center for Atmospheric Research S-band, research, dual-polarization radar, colocated to the east of Denver, are compared. In addition, very short range forecasts from a convection-resolving dynamic model, which is initialized variationally using the radar reflectivity and Doppler winds, are compared with forecasts from an automated-algorithmic forecast system that also employs the radar data. The radar estimates of rain rate, and the two forecasting systems that employ the radar data, have degraded accuracy by virtue of the fact that they are applied in complex terrain. Nevertheless, the radar data and forecasts from the dynamic model and the automated algorithm could be operationally useful for input to surface-hydrologic models employed for flood warning. Precipitation data provided by these various techniques at short time scales and at fine spatial resolutions are employed as detailed input to a distributed-parameter hydrologic model for flash-flood prediction and analysis. With the radar-based precipitation estimates employed as input, the simulated flood discharge was similar to that observed. The dynamic-model precipitation forecast showed the most promise in providing a significant discharge-forecast lead time. The algorithmic system's precipitation forecast did not demonstrate as much skill, but the associated discharge forecast would still have been sufficient to have provided an alert of impending flood danger.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barnes, H., and Davidian, J. ( 1978). “Indirect methods.” Hydrometry—Principles and practices, R. W. Hershey, ed., Wiley, New York, 189–190.
2.
Brandes, E. A., Vivekanandan, J., and Wilson, J. W. ( 1999). “A comparison of radar reflectivity estimates of rainfall from collocated radars.” J. Atmospheric and Oceanic Technol., 16, 1264–1272.
3.
Chow, V. T. ( 1988). Open channel hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
4.
Cluckie, I. D., and Collier, C. G., eds. ( 1991). Hydrological applications of weather radar, Ellis Horwood, New York.
5.
Conway, B. J., et al. ( 1996). COST 78: Meteorology—Nowcasting, a survey of current knowledge, techniques and practice, European Commission, Office of Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
6.
Dixon, M., and Wiener, G. ( 1993). “TITAN: Thunderstorm identification, tracking, analysis, and nowcasting—A radar-based methodology.” J. Atmospheric and Oceanic Technol., 10, 785–797.
7.
Fritsch, J. M., et al. ( 1998). “Quantitative precipitation forecasting: Report of the Eighth Prospectus Development Team, U.S. Weather Research Program.” Bull. Am. Meteorological Soc., 79, 285–299.
8.
Georgakakos, K. P., and Hudlow, M. D. ( 1984). “Quantitative precipitation forecast techniques for use in hydrologic forecasting.” Bull. Am. Meteorological Soc., 65, 1186–1200.
9.
Hand, W. H. ( 1996). “An object-oriented technique for nowcasting heavy showers and thunderstorms.” Meteorological Applications, 3, 31–41.
10.
Hand, W. H., and Conway, B. J. ( 1995). “An object-oriented approach for nowcasting showers.” Weather Forecasting, 10, 327–341.
11.
Jarrett, R. D., and Browning, T. W. ( 1999). “Effects of rainstorms on water and sediment runoff following the 1996 wildfire, Buffalo Creek, Colorado.” J. Hydro., in press.
12.
Johnson, D., Smith, M., Koren, V., and Finnerty, B. (1999). “Comparing mean areal precipitation estimates from NEXRAD and rain gauge networks.”J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 4(2), 117–124.
13.
Leavesley, G., Restrepo, P., Markstrom, S., Dixon, M., and Stannard, L. ( 1996). “The modular modeling system—MMS: User's manual.” U.S. Geological Survey Open File Rep. 96-151, Lakewood, Colo.
14.
Leavesley, G. H., and Stannard, L. G. ( 1995). “Chapter 9: The precipitation-runoff modeling system—PRMS.” Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo.
15.
Lee, T. H., and Georgakakos, K. P. ( 1996). “Operational rainfall prediction on meso-γ scales for hydrologic applications.” Water Resour. Res., 32, 987–1003.
16.
Rawls, W., Ahuja, L., Brakensiek, D., and Shirmohammadi, A. ( 1993). “Infiltration and soil water movement.” Handbook of hydrology, D. Maidment, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
17.
Ryzhkov, A., and Zrnić, D. ( 1996). “Assessment of rainfall measurement that uses specific differential phase.” J. Appl. Meteorology, 35, 2080–2090.
18.
Sachidanada, M., and Zrnić, D. S. ( 1987). “Rain rate estimates from differential polarization measurements.” J. Atmospheric and Oceanic Technol., 4, 588–598.
19.
Sun, J., and Crook, N. A. ( 1994). “Wind and thermodynamic retrieval from single-Doppler measurements of a gust front observed during Phoenix II.” Mon. Weather Rev., 122, 1075–1091.
20.
Sun, J., and Crook, N. A. ( 1997). “Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint: Part I. Model development and simulated data experiments.” J. Atmospheric Sci., 54, 1642–1661.
21.
UDFCD. ( 2000). Urban drainage and flood control district. Denver.
22.
Vivekanandan, J., Yates, D. N., and Brandes, E. A. ( 1999). “The influence of terrain on rainfall estimates from radar reflectivity and specific propagation phase observation.” J. Atmospheric and Oceanic Technol., 16, 837–845.
23.
Warner, T. T., Kibler, D. F., and Steinhart, R. L. ( 1991). “Testing of a coupled meteorological-hydrological forecast model for the Susquehanna River Basin in Pennsylvania.” J. Appl. Meteorology, 30, 1521–1533.
24.
Westrick, K., Mass, C., Storck, P., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. ( 1998). “Prediction of a rain-on-snow flood event using a coupled hydrometeorological forecast system.” Spec. Symp. on Hydro., American Meteorological Society, 306–309.
25.
Wilson, J. W., Crook, N. A., Mueller, C. K., Sun, J., and Dixon, M. ( 1999). “Nowcasting thunderstorms: A status report.” Bull. Am. Meteorological Soc., 79, 2079–2099.
26.
Wilson, J. W., and Mueller, C. K. ( 1993). “Nowcast of thunderstorm initiation and evolution.” Weather and Forecasting, 8, 113–131.
27.
Wilson, J. W., Weckwerth, T. M., Vivekanandan, J., Wakimoto, R. M., and Russell, R. W. ( 1994). “Boundary layer clear-air radar echoes: Origin of echoes and accuracy of derived winds.” J. Atmospheric and Oceanic Technol., 11, 1184–1206.
28.
Xu, Q. ( 1996). “Generalized adjoint for physical processes with parameterized discontinuities. Part I: Basic issues and heuristic examples.” J. Atmospheric Sci., 53, 1123–1142.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 6 • Issue 4 • August 2001
Pages: 265 - 274
History
Received: Dec 21, 1999
Published online: Aug 1, 2001
Published in print: Aug 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.