Grid-Size Effects on Surface Runoff Modeling
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 1
Abstract
The effects of grid-cell size on surface runoff modeling using a distributed hydrologic model are examined. The raster-based hydrologic CASC2D model is applied to two watersheds in northern Mississippi. Observed streamflow for Goodwin Creek (21 km2) is used in calibrating the model's infiltration, runoff, and routing parameters. The results are extended to Hickahala-Senatobia (560 km2), which has similar physical characteristics. The applicability of CASC2D in simulating rainfall-runoff processes is tested using square grid-cell sizes ranging from 127 to 914 m. Event-based simulation results indicate that coarser grid-cell resolutions can be used in rainfall-runoff simulations as long as parameters are appropriately calibrated. It is demonstrated that the primary effect of increasing grid-cell size on simulation parameters is to require an increase in overland and channel roughness coefficients. The concept of a watershed time-to-equilibrium is used in evaluating the runoff response of overland and channel cells. At different grid-cell sizes, raster maps generated within a GRASS GIS environment provide information regarding the spatial distribution of drainage area, time-to-equilibrium, and equilibrium discharge on Goodwin Creek and Hickahala-Senatobia. It is shown that at increasing grid-cell size, the statistical distribution of drainage areas associated with overland cells is significantly increased, while the statistical distribution of drainage areas associated with channel cells is hardly affected by grid-cell size. It is also demonstrated that flow on overland cells is more sensitive to changes in grid-cell size than is channel flow. Since channel flow dominates the shape of the hydrograph in large watersheds, the results indicate that coarse grid sizes can be used for rainfall-runoff simulations on large watersheds. The results also indicate that coarser grid sizes will be more appropriate when simulating events of high intensity or of long duration.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Agiralioglu, N. (1988). “Estimation of the time of concentration for diverging surfaces.” J. Hydrolog. Sci., 33(2), 173–179.
2.
Beven, K. (1983). “Surface water hydrology: Runoff generation and basin structure.” Rev. of Geophys., 21(3), 721–729.
3.
Blackmarr, W. A., ed. ( 1995). “Documentation of hydrologic, geomorphic, and sediment transport measurements on Goodwin Creek experimental watershed, Northern Mississippi, for the period 1982–1993—preliminary release.” Agricultural Research Serv., U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Oxford, Miss., 141.
4.
Doe, W. W., and Saghafian, B. (1992). “Spatial and temporal effects of army maneuvers on watershed response: The integration of GRASS and a 2-D hydrologic model.” Proc., 7th Annu. GRASS Users Conf., Tech. Rep. NPS/NRG15D/NRTR-93/13, National Park Service, Lakewood, Colo., 91–165.
5.
Dunne, T. ( 1982). “Models of runoff processes and their significance.” Scientific Basis of water resource management, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 17–30.
6.
GRASS 4.1 user's reference manual. (1993). USACE, Compiled at Construction Engineering Research Labs., Champaign, Ill., 458.
7.
Henderson, F. M., and Wooding, R. A. (1964). “Overland and groundwater flow from a steady rainfall of finite duration.” J. Geophys. Res., 69(8), 1531–1540.
8.
James, L. D., and Burges, S. J. ( 1982). “Selection, calibration, and testing of hydrologic models.” Hydrological modeling of small watersheds, C. T. Haan, H. P. Johnson, and D. L. Brakensiek, eds., American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich., Monogr. Ser., 5, 435–472.
9.
Johnson, B. E. ( 1993). “Comparison of distributed vs. lumped rainfall-runoff modeling techniques,” MS thesis, Memphis State University, Memphis, Tenn.
10.
Johnson, B. E., Raphelt, N. K., and Willis, J. C. (1993). “Verification of hydrologic modeling systems.” Proc., Federal Water Agency Workshop on Hydrologic Modeling Demands for the 90's, Rep. 93-4018, Water Resources Investigations, U.S. Geological Survey, Sec. 8., 9–10.
11.
Julien, P. Y., and Moglen, G. E. (1990). “Similarity and length scale for spatially varied overland flow.” Water Resour. Res., 26, 1819–1832.
12.
Julien, P. Y., Saghafian, B., and Ogden, F. L. (1995). “Raster-based hydrological modeling of spatially-varied surface runoff.” Water Resour. Res., 31(3), 523–535.
13.
Lighthill, M. H., and Whitham, G. B. (1955). “On kinetic waves, I: Flood movement in long rivers.” Proc., Royal Society of London, Ser. A, 229, 281–316.
14.
Molnár, D. K. ( 1997). “Grid size selection for 2-D hydrologic modeling of large watersheds,” PhD dissertation, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colo.
15.
Ogden, F. ( 1992). “Two-dimensional runoff modeling with weather radar data,” PhD dissertation, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colo.
16.
Ogden, F., and Julien, P. Y. (1994). “Two-dimensional runoff sensitivity to radar resolution.” J. Hydrol., 128(1–2), 1–18.
17.
Ogden, F., Richardson, J. R., and Julien, P. Y. (1995). “Similarity in catchment response. 2: Moving rainstorms.” Water Resour. Res., 31(6), 1543–1547.
18.
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Miller, N. (1983). “Green-Ampt infiltration parameters from soils data.”J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 109(1), 62–70.
19.
Saghafian, B. ( 1992). “Hydrologic analysis of watershed response to spatially varied infiltration,” PhD dissertation, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colo.
20.
Saghafian, B., and Julien, P. Y. (1995). “Time to equilibrium for spatially variable watersheds.” J. Hydrol., 172, 231–245.
21.
Saghafian, B., Julien, P. Y., and Ogden, F. L. (1995). “Similarity in catchment response, 1: Stationary rainstorms.” Water Resour. Res., 31(6), 1533–1541.
22.
Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., and Wood, H. F. (1987). “On hydrologic similarity, 2: A scaled model of storm runoff production.” Water Resour. Res., 23(12), 2266–2278.
23.
Wood, E. F. (1983). “Hydrology 1979–1982.” Rev. of Geophys., 21(3), 697–698.
24.
Wood, E. F., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., and Band, L. (1988). “Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling.” J. Hydrol., 102, 29–47.
25.
Wood, E. F., Sivapalan, M., and Beven, K. J. (1990). “Similarity and scale in catchment storm response.” Rev. of Geophys., 28(1).
26.
Wooding, R. A. (1965a). “A hydraulic model for the catchment-stream problem, I. Kinematic-wave theory.” J. Hydrol., 3, 254–267.
27.
Wooding, R. A. (1965b). “A hydraulic model for the catchment-stream problem, II. Numerical solutions.” J. Hydrol., 3, 268–282.
28.
Wooding, R. A. (1966). “A hydraulic model for the catchment-stream problem, III. Comparison with runoff observations.” J. Hydrol., 4, 21–37.
29.
Woolhiser, D. A. ( 1975). “Simulation of unsteady overland flow.” Unsteady flow in open channels, K. Mahmood and V. Yevjevich, eds., Vol. II, Water Resource Publ., Ft. Collins, Colo.
30.
Woolhiser, D. A. (1977). “Unsteady free-surface flow problems.” Mathematical models for surface water hydrology, Wiley, New York, 195–213.
31.
Woolhiser, D. A., and Goodrich, D. (1988). “Effect of storm rainfall intensity patterns on surface runoff.” J. Hydrol., 102, 335–354.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Feb 3, 1998
Published online: Jan 1, 2000
Published in print: Jan 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.