Comparing Mean Areal Precipitation Estimates from NEXRAD and Rain Gauge Networks
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 2
Abstract
Mean areal precipitation values (MAPX) derived from next generation weather radar (NEXRAD) stage III data are compared with mean areal precipitation (MAP) values derived from a precipitation gauge network. The gauge-derived MAPs are computed using Thiessen polygon weighting, whereas the radar-based MAPXs utilize the gridded stage III radar precipitation products that have been conditioned with gauge measurements and have been merged with overlapping radar fields. We compare over 4,000 pairs of MAPX and MAP estimates over a 3-year time period for each of eight basins in the southern plains region of the United States. Over the long term, mean areal estimates derived from NEXRAD generally are 5–10% below gauge-derived estimates. In the smallest basin, the long-term MAPX mean was greater than the MAP. For storm events, a slight tendency for NEXRAD to measure fewer yet more intense intervals of precipitation is identified. Comparison of hydrologic simulations using the two forcings indicates that significant differences in runoff volume can result. This work is aimed at providing insight into the use of a data product that is becoming increasingly available for public use. It also is aimed at investigating the use of radar data in hydrologic models that have been calibrated using gauge-based precipitation estimates.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barge, B. L., Humphries, R. G., Mah, S. J., and Kuhnke, W. K. ( 1979). “Rainfall measurements by weather radar: Applications to hydrology.” Water Resour. Res., 15(6), 1380–1386.
2.
Battan, L. J. ( 1973). Radar observation of the atmosphere . University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3.
Borga, M., Da Ros, D., Fattorelli, S., and Vizzaccaro, A. ( 1995). “Influence of various weather radar correction procedures on mean areal rainfall estimation and rainfall-runoff simulation.” Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Hydro. Applications of Weather Radar, ABRH, International Association of Hydraulic Research, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 146–157.
4.
Burnash, R. J. C. ( 1995). “The NWS river forecast system—Catchment modeling.” Comp. models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo., Chapter 10, 311–366.
5.
Burnash, R. J. C., Ferral, R. L., and McGuire, R. A. ( 1973). “A generalized streamflow simulation system—Conceptual modeling for digital computers.” U.S. Department of Commerce, National Weather Service and State of California, Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, Calif., Silver Spring, Md.
6.
Collier, C. G., Harrold, T. W., and Nicholass, C. A. ( 1975). “A comparison of areal rainfall as measured by a raingauge-calibrated radar system and raingauge networks of various densities.” Proc., 16th Meteorology Conf., American Meteorological Society, Boston, 467–472.
7.
Finnerty, B. D., and Johnson, D. ( 1997). “Comparison of National Weather Service operational mean areal precipitation estimates derived from NEXRAD radar vs. raingage networks.” Presented at the IAHR XXVII Congr., International Association of Hydraulic Research, Delft, The Netherlands.
8.
Finnerty, B. D., Smith, M. B., Koren, V., Seo, D. J., and Moglen, G. ( 1997). “Space-time scale sensitivity of the Sacramento model to radar-gage precipitation inputs.” J. Hydrol., Amsterdam, 203, 21–38.
9.
Fulton, R. A., Briedenbach, J. P., Seo, D. J., Miller, D. A., and O'Bannon, T. ( 1998). “The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm.” Weather and Forecasting, 13(2), 377–379.
10.
Goodhew, R., and Mylne, M. ( 1992). “Measurement of areal rainfall by an operational radar at medium range.” Paper No. H2, Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on Hydro. Applications of Weather Radar, University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
11.
Greene, D. R., and Hudlow, M. D. ( 1982). “Hydrometeorological grid mapping procedures.” AWRA Int. Symp. on Hydrometeorology, American Water Resources Association, Bethesda, Md.
12.
Hopper, S. E., Illingworth, A. J., and Caylor, I. J. ( 1991). “Bright-band errors in rainfall measurement: Identification and correction using linearly polarized radar returns.” Hydrological applications of weather radar, I. C. Cluckie and C. G. Collier, eds., Ellis Horwood Series in Environmental Management, Science and Technology, Chichester, West Sussex, England, 240–249.
13.
Hudlow, D. D. ( 1988). “Technological developments in real-time operational hydrologic forecasting in the United States.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 102, 69–92.
14.
Klazura, G. E., and Imy, D. A. ( 1993). “A description of the initial set of analysis products available from the NEXRAD WSR-88D system.” Bull. Am. Meteorological Soc., Boston, 74(July), 1293–1311.
15.
National Weather Service. ( 1993). OFS MAP preprocessor function . National Weather Service River Forecast System User's Manual, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Md.
16.
Seo, D. J., Fulton, R., Breidenbach, J. P., Miller, D., and Friend, E. ( 1995). “Final report for October 1, 1993 to October 31, 1994.” Interagency Memorandum of Understanding among the NEXRAD Program, WSR-88D Operational Support Facility, and the National Weather Service Office of Hydrology, Hydrologic Research Laboratory, Silver Spring, Md.
17.
Seo, D. J., and Johnson, E. R. ( 1995). “The WSR-88D precipitation processing subsystem—An overview and a performance evaluation.” Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Hydro. Applications of Weather Radar, I.A.H.R., Delft, The Netherlands, 222–231.
18.
Shedd, R. C., and Fulton, R. A. ( 1993). “WSR-88D precipitation processing and its use in the National Weather Service hydrologic forecasting.” Proc. of ASCE Int. Symp. on Engrg. Hydr., ASCE, Reston, Va., 25–30.
19.
Smith, J. A., and Krajewski, W. ( 1994). “Final report—Estimation of parameters for the NEXRAD rainfall algorithms.” Submitted to NOAA National Weather Service, Office of Hydrology, Hydrologic Research Laboratory.
20.
Smith, J. A., Seo, D. J., Baeck, M. L., and Hudlow, M. ( 1996). “An intercomparison study of NEXRAD precipitation estimates.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2035–2045.
21.
Smith, P. L., Cain, D. E., and Dennis, A. S. ( 1975). “Derivation of an R-Z relationship by computer optimization and its use in measuring daily areal rainfall.” Proc., 16th Radar Meteorology Conf., American Meteorological Society, Boston.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • April 1999
Pages: 117 - 124
History
Received: Sep 18, 1997
Published online: Apr 1, 1999
Published in print: Apr 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.