Evolution of Clark's Unit Graph Method to Spatially Distributed Runoff
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 1
Abstract
In 1945, C. O. Clark proposed a method to develop synthetic unit hydrographs for the modeling of watershed rainfall response. His technique utilizes two components: a translation hydrograph and a linear reservoir routing. Clark's three parameters (the time of concentration TC, a storage attenuation coefficient R, and a time-area histogram) can be estimated for gauged basins. For ungauged basins, TC and R are difficult to estimate. TC can be approximated by analyzing physical basin characteristics whereas both TC and R have been successfully estimated using parameter regionalization. Technologies for observing and managing spatially distributed watershed and rainfall information are constantly evolving. The improved availability of areally oriented data brings the challenge of integration of these data into hydrologic models. The Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) has developed the program ModClark to take a first step in this integration. ModClark is based conceptually on Clark's 50-year-old method and uses next generation weather radar (NEXRAD) data. The ability of Clark's technique to accommodate the spatially distributed nature of rainfall and runoff illustrates the adaptability of Clark's original methodology. A demonstration of this adapted methodology is provided.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“A pilot application of weather radar-based runoff forecasting, Salt River Basin, MO.” (1996). Proj. Rep. No. 31, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engrg. Ctr. (HEC), Davis, Calif.
2.
“Application of a geographic information system to rainfall-runoff modeling.” (1991). Res. Document No. 36, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engrg. Ctr. (HEC), Davis, Calif.
3.
Bedient, P. B., and Huber, W. C. (1988). Hydrology and floodplain analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.
4.
Chow, V. T. (ed.) (1964). Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
5.
Clark, C. O. (1945). “Storage and the unit hydrograph.”Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrg., Vol. 110, 1419–1446.
6.
Dooge, J. C. I. (1973). “Linear theory of hydrologic systems.”Tech. Bull. No. 1468, Agric. Res. Service, U.S. Dept. of Agr., Washington, D.C.
7.
Fuller, W. E.(1914). “Flood flows.”Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrg., 77, 564–694.
8.
GridParm-DEM2HRAP: a procedure for evaluating runoff parameters for HRAP cells from USGS digital elevation models—draft. (1995). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engrg. Ctr. (HEC), Davis, Calif.
9.
HEC-DSS user's guide and utility manuals. (1994). Comp. Program Document No. 45, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engrg. Ctr. (HEC), Davis, Calif.
10.
HEC-1 flood hydrograph package. (1990). Comp. Program Document No. 1A, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engrg. Ctr. (HEC), Davis, Calif.
11.
Hudlow, M. D., Smith, J. A., Walton, M. L., and Shedd, R. C. (1991). “NEXRAD—New era in hydrometeorology.”Hydrological Applications of Weather Radar, I. Cluckie and C. Collier, eds. Ellis Horwood Inc., New York, N.Y., 602–612.
12.
Hydrologic analysis of ungaged watersheds using HEC-1. (1982). Training Document No. 15, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engrg. Ctr. (HEC), Davis, Calif.
13.
Jarvis, C. S. (1926). “Flood flow characteristics.”Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrg., Vol. 89, 985–1032.
14.
Kuichling, E. (1889). “The relation between the rainfall and the discharge of sewers in populous districts.”Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrg., Vol. 20, 1–56.
15.
Linsley, R. K., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H. (1958). Hydrology for engineers. McGraw Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
16.
Lloyd-Davies, D. E. (1906). “The elimination of storm water from sewerage systems.”Proc., Instn. Civ. Engrs., Vol. 164, 41–67.
17.
Maidment, D. R. (1992). “Grid-based computation of runoff: a preliminary assessment.” Prepared for Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif.
18.
Maidment, D. R. (1994). “Digital delineation of watersheds and stream networks in the Allegheny basin.” Prepared for Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif.
19.
McMath, R. E. (1887). “Determination of the size of sewers.”Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrg., Vol. 16, 183–190.
20.
ModClark modified Clark runoff simulation users manual—draft. (1995). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engrg. Ctr. (HEC), Davis, Calif.
21.
Mulvaney, T. J.(1851). “On the use of self-registering rain and flood gauges.”Instn. Civ. Eng. (Ireland) Trans., 4(2), 1–8.
22.
Sherman, L. K. (1932). “Streamflow from rainfall by unit-graph method.”Engineering News-Record, Vol. 108, 501–505.
23.
Sherman, L. K. (1945). “Discussion on `Storage and the unit hydrograph,' by C. O. Clark.”Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrg., 1449.
24.
Snyder, F. F. (1938). “Synthetic unit-graphs.”Trans. Am. Geophysical Union, Vol. 19, 447–454.
25.
Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1957). “Supplement A to Sect. 4: Hydrology.”Engineering Handbook. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
26.
Sweet, J. S. (1945). “Discussion on `Storage and the unit hydrograph,' by C. O. Clark.”Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrg., Vol. 110, 1447.
27.
Thomas, D. M., and Benson, M. A. (1970). “Generalization of streamflow characteristics from drainage-basin characteristics.”Water-Supply Paper 1975, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
28.
Water control software—forecast and operations. (1989). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engrg. Ctr. (HEC), Davis, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 3 • Issue 1 • January 1998
Pages: 9 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1998
Published in print: Jan 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.