Application of Two Direct Runoff Prediction Methods in Puerto Rico
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 1
Abstract
Two methods for predicting direct runoff from rainfall data were applied to several basins and the resulting hydrographs compared to measured values. The first method uses a geomorphology-based unit hydrograph to predict direct runoff through its convolution with the excess rainfall hyetograph. The second method shows how the resulting hydraulic routing flow equation from a kinematic wave approximation is solved using a spectral method based on the matrix representation of the spatial derivative with Chebyshev collocation and a fourth-order Runge-Kutta time discretization scheme. The calibrated Green-Ampt (GA) infiltration parameters are obtained by minimizing the sum, over several rainfall events, of absolute differences between the total excess rainfall volume computed from the GA equations and the total direct runoff volume computed from a hydrograph separation technique. The improvement made in predicting direct runoff using a geomorphology-based unit hydrograph with the ephemeral and perennial stream network instead of the strictly perennial stream network is negligible. The hydraulic routing scheme presented here is highly accurate in predicting the magnitude and time of the hydrograph peak although the much faster unit hydrograph method also yields reasonable results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allam, M. N., and Balkhair, K. S.(1987). “Case study evaluation of the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph.”Water Resour. Mgmt., 1, 267–291.
2.
Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A., and Zang, T. A. (1988). Spectral methods in fluid dynamics. Springer-Verlag New York, New York, N.Y.
3.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
4.
Gupta, V. K., Waymire, E., and Wang, C. T.(1980). “A representation of an instantaneous unit hydrograph from geomorphology.”Water Resour. Res., 16(5), 855–862.
5.
Hirsch, M. W., and Smale, S. (1974). Differential equations, dynamical systems, and linear algebra. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
6.
Horton, R. E.(1945). “Erosional development of streams and their drainage basin, hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology.”Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 56, 275–370.
7.
Mays, L. W., and Taur, C. K.(1982). “Unit hydrographs via nonlinear programming.”Water Resour. Res., 18(4), 744–752.
8.
Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., and Valdés, J. B.(1979). “The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response.”Water Resour. Res., 15(6), 1409–1420.
9.
Sepúlveda, N., Pérez-Blair, F., DeLong, L., and López-Trujillo, D. (1996). “Real-time rainfall-runoff model of the Carraízo-reservoir basin in Puerto Rico.”USGS Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. 95-4235, U.S. Geological Survey, San Juan, P.R.
10.
Smart, J. S.(1972). “Channel Networks.”Adv. Hydrosci., 8, 305–346.
11.
Strahler, A. N.(1957). “Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology.”Am. Geophys. Union Trans., 38(6), 913–920.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1997
Published in print: Jan 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.