Fundamental Principles for Avoiding Congested Work Areas—A Case Study
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 11, Issue 4
Abstract
It has been documented that labor performance or labor productivity is adversely affected by congested work areas and stacking of trades. Limited data are available that help to quantify losses in labor productivity due to congestion, or to document the severity of problems resulting from workspace congestion. Stacking of trades is often discussed in the context of construction claims, yet congested work areas can occur on projects where there are no claims and for reasons other than the stacking of trades. This suggests that a level of acceptance exists about the inevitability of workspace congestion, and the resulting losses in field productivity and profit. This paper presents a detailed and illustrative case study focused on the documentation of workspace congestion and the resulting effects on labor productivity. A description of the project conditions are provided, along with quantitative and qualitative data collection methods used in the field. The measured productivity rates in the field are then compared to baseline productivity rates based on historical data. Sources of lower productivity are then attributed to causal disruptions observed in the field, and the adverse effects due to congestion, poor weather, or workforce management are calculated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Institute of Architects (AIA). (1997). “General conditions of the contract for construction.” AIA Document A201, Washington, D.C.
Horner, R. M. W., and Talhouni, B. T. (1993). Effects of accelerated working, delays and disruptions on labour productivity, The Chartered Institute of Building, London.
Logcher, R. D., and Collins, W. C. (1978). “Management impacts on labor productivity.” J. Constr. Div., 104(4), 447–451.
Riley, D., and Sanvido, V. (1995). “Patterns of construction—Space use in multistory buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(4), 464–473.
Riley, D., and Sanvido, V. (1997a). “Space planning for mechanical, electrical plumbing and fire protection trades in multistory building construction.” Proc., 5th ASCE Construction Congress, Minneapolis, 120–109.
Riley, D., and Sanvido, V. (1997b). “Space planning method for multistory building construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(2), 171–180.
Smith, A. G. (1987). “Increasing onsite production.” Trans. Am. Assn. Cost. Eng., K.4.1–K.4.13.
Thabet, W. (1992). “A space constrained resource constrained schedule system for multistory buildings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, Va.
Thomas, H. R., and Horner, R. M. W. (2000). “Procedures manual for collecting productivity and related data of labor-intensive activities on commercial construction projects.” Final Rep., The Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, Pa.
Thomas, H. R., and Smith, G. R. (1992). “Loss of labor productivity: The weight of expert opinion.” PTI Rep. No. 9019, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
Thomas, H. R., and Zavski, I. (1999). “Construction baseline productivity: Theory and practice.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(5), 295–303.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 9, 2006
Accepted: May 23, 2006
Published online: Nov 1, 2006
Published in print: Nov 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.