Justifiable Precision and Accuracy in Structural Engineering Calculations: In Search of a Little Less Precision and Supposed Accuracy
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 10, Issue 3
Abstract
As a result of technological progression, mathematical calculations may currently be carried out to levels of precision which are orders of magnitude greater than were possible only decades ago. Consequently, design professionals are producing structural engineering calculations to unrealistically high levels of precision. Many engineers advocate the reporting of structural design calculations to four, five, and even six significant figures, with disregard to the implicit precision on which modern design codes and specifications are based. In response to these expectations, historical documents pertaining to structural design have been reviewed, methods of structural analysis have been considered, and practical design situations have been reviewed in order to remind the structural engineer of the inherent limitations of the precision of structural engineering calculations. Conclusions have been drawn from these considerations, and a recommendation with respect to an appropriate level of precision in structural design is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1941). “Building regulations for reinforced concrete.” ACI 318-41, Detroit.
American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318. (1995). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” ACI 318-95; and “Commentary.” ACI 318R-95, Farmington Hills, Mich.
American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318. (2002). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” ACI 318-02; and “Commentary.” ACI 318R-02, Farmington Hills, Mich.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1923). Steel construction, New York.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1969). Specification for the design, fabrication, & erection of structural steel for buildings, New York.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1973). Manual of steel construction: Allowable stress design, New York.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1978). Specification for the design, fabrication, & erection of structural steel for buildings, Chicago.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1980). Manual of steel construction, Chicago.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1986). Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings, Chicago.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1989a). Manual of steel construction: Allowable stress design, Chicago.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1989b). Specification for structural steel buildings, Chicago.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1994). Load & resistance factor design: Manual of steel construction, Chicago.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1999). Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings, Chicago.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2001). Load and resistance factor design: Manual of steel construction, Chicago.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2002a). “A36/A36M-03a standard specification for carbon structural steel.” Annual book of ASTM standards, Philadelphia.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2002b). “A53/A53M-02 standard specification for pipe, steel, black and hot-dipped, zinc-coated, welded and seamless.” Annual book of ASTM standards, Philadelphia.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2002c). “C39/C39M-01 standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” Annual book of ASTM standards, Philadelphia, 18–22.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2002d). “E8/E8M standard testing methods for tensile of metal materials.” Annual book of ASTM standards, Philadelphia, 68–74.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (2002e). “E29-93a standard practice for using significant digits in test data to determine conformance with specifications.” Annual book of ASTM standards, Philadelphia, 19–22.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (2002). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-02, Reston, Va.
Department of Commerce (DOC) Building Code Committee. (1924). Minimum live loads allowable for use in design of buildings, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.
Florida Building Commission (FBC). (2001). Florida building code, Tallahassee, Fla.
Ghosh, S. K., Fanella, D. A., Rabbat, B. G., and Portland Cement Association. (1996). Notes on ACI 318-95, Building code requirements for structural concrete: With design applications, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Ill.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (1997). IEEE dictionary of electrical and electronic terms, New York.
National Association of Architectural Metal Manufacturers (NAAMM). (1992). Metal stairs manual, 5th Ed., Chicago.
National Association of Architectural Metal Manufacturers (NAAMM). (1995). Pipe railing design manual (ANSI/NAAMM 521-95), Chicago.
Petroski, H. (1985). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design, St. Martin, New York.
Portland Cement Association (PCA). (1993). Simplified design: Reinforced concrete buildings of moderate size and height, Skokie, Ill.
Salvadori, M. (1980). Why buildings stand up: The strength of architecture, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 3, 2004
Accepted: Aug 17, 2004
Published online: Aug 1, 2005
Published in print: Aug 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.