TECHNICAL PAPERS
Feb 19, 2004

Highway Development Decision-Making under Uncertainty: A Real Options Approach

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 10, Issue 1

Abstract

A highway system development involves huge irreversible investments, and requires rigorous modeling and analysis before the implementation decision is made. This decision-making process is embedded with multiple uncertainties due to changes in political, social, and environmental contexts. In this paper, we present a multistage stochastic model for decision making in highway development, operation, expansion, and rehabilitation. This model accounts for the evolution of three uncertainties, namely, traffic demand, land price, and highway deterioration, as well as their interdependence. Real options in both development and operation phases of a highway are also incorporated in the model. A solution algorithm based on the Monte Carlo simulation and least-squares regression is developed. Numerical results show that the proposed model and solution algorithm are promising. This model makes a radical and conceptual step towards optimal decision making in highway engineering, which achieves decision-making optimality that is generally not well defined in traditional policy-based approaches for highway planning.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abaza, K. A.(2002). “Optimum flexible pavement life-cycle analysis model.” J. Transp. Eng., 128(16), 542–549.
Appraisal Institute. (2000). “Uniform appraisal standards for federal land acquisitions.” Chicago.
Bellman, R. E., and Dreyfus, S. E. (1962). Applied dynamics programming, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Cesare, M. A., Santamarina, C., Turkstra, C., and Vanmarcke, E. H.(1992). “Modeling bridge deterioration with Markov chains.” J. Transp. Eng., 118(6), 820–833.
Copeland, T. E., Koller, T., and Murrin, J. (1990). Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies, Wiley, New York.
DeVuyst, C. S., DeVuyst, E. A., and Baker, T. G.(1995). “Expected farm mortgage default cost.” Agric. Finance Rev., 55, 1–13.
Federal Highway Administration. (2001). “Deficient bridges by state and highway system.” www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/defbr01.htm
Gifford, J. L. (2003). Flexible urban transportation, Elsevier, New York.
Hudson, W. R., Haas, R., and Uddin, W. (1997). Infrastructure management, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hull, J. C. (1999). Options, futures, and other derivative securities, 4th Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Leviakangas, P., and Lahesmaa, J.(2002). “Profitability evaluation of intelligent transport system investment.” J. Transp. Eng., 128(3), 276–286.
Li, N., Xie, W., and Haas, R. (1996). “Reliability-based processing of Markov chains for modeling pavement network deterioration.” Transportation Research Record 1524, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–10.
Longstaff, F. A., and Schwartz, E. S.(2001). “Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach.” Rev. Financ. Stud., 14(1), 113–147.
Luenberger, D. G. (1998). Investment science, Oxford, New York.
Madanat, S. M., Mishalani, R., and Ibrahim, W. H.(1995). “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(2), 120–125.
Matasov, A. I. (1998). Estimators for uncertain dynamic systems, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Micevski, T., Kuczera, G., and Coombes, P.(2002). “Markov model for storm pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(2), 49–56.
Neely, J., and de Neufville, R.(2001). “Hybrid real options valuation of risky product development projects.” Int. J. Technol. Policy Manage., 1(1), 29–46.
Roebeling, P. C., and Hendrix, E. M. T. (2002). “Land speculation as a cause of deforestation: The role of cattle ranching in the humid tropics of Costa Rica.” Proc., Conf. on Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and Resource Economics, Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Group, Wageningen Univ., Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Washington State Department of Transportation. (2002). “Highway construction cost comparison survey: Final report.” www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/construction/constructioncosts.htm
Wright, P. H., and Paquette, R. J. (1979). Highway engineering, 4th Ed., Wiley, New York.
Zayed, T. M., Chang, L.-M., and Fricker, J. D.(2002). “Life-cycle cost analysis using deterministic and stochastic methods: Conflicting results.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 16(2), 63–74.
Zhao, T. (2003). “Valuing facility expansion and layout: A real options approach.” PhD dissertation, Univ. of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Md.
Zhao, T., and Tseng, C.-L.(2003). “Valuing flexibility in infrastructure expansion.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(3), 89–97.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 10Issue 1March 2004
Pages: 23 - 32

History

Received: Apr 23, 2003
Accepted: Nov 20, 2003
Published online: Feb 19, 2004
Published in print: Mar 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tong Zhao
Faculty Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Satheesh K. Sundararajan
PhD Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Chung-Li Tseng
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share