Prioritizing Scour Vulnerable Bridges Using Risk
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 5, Issue 3
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop a method for assessing the risk associated with scour threat to bridge foundations. In response to numerous scour-related bridge failures, the Federal Highway Administration has mandated that states evaluate all bridges over water for scour. The Federal Highway Administration recently released HEC-18 to serve as a guidance manual in evaluating scour. In evaluating bridge scour, however, foundation information is needed to quantify vulnerability to scour damage, and this information is not available for many bridges. The methodology developed in this study will set priorities for bridge foundation information gathering. The risk of scour failure is calculated as the product of the cost associated with failure and the probability of scour failure. The method is based on data (much of which is subjective) contained in the National Bridge Inventory. The risk determines the ranking of bridges for foundation data gathering in support of scour evaluation; high-calculated risks could vanish if substantial foundations are discovered.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Drainage manual. (1980). Virginia DOT, Va.
2.
Elias, V. (1994). “Strategies for managing unknown bridge foundations.” Rep. No. FHWA-RD-92-030, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Federal Highway Administration, Res. and Devel., Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, Va.
3.
A manual on user benefit analysis on highway and bus-transit improvements. (1977). AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
4.
Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation's bridges. (1988). Ofc. of Engrg. Bridge Div., Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
5.
Richardson, E. V., and Huber, F. W. (1991). “Evaluation of bridge vulnerability to hydraulic forces, stream instability and scour.” Trans. Res. Rec. 1290, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
6.
The scour priority number. (1990). Bridge Scour Program, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore, Md.
7.
Structure scour evaluation plan for existing structures. (1990). North Carolina DOT, Raleigh, N.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Jul 18, 1997
Published online: Sep 1, 1999
Published in print: Sep 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.