Simplified Formulation of Virgin and Overlaid Pavement Deterioration Models
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 4, Issue 2
Abstract
A universal-type model, taking into account the various possible forms of deterioration rates during a pavement's life span, was introduced by the writer elsewhere. The subsequent deterioration curves for each cycle of the overlay placement were derived from the parameters of the original deterioration curve for any specific maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) strategy applied to the pavement under consideration. The various computations involved with these deterioration curves, however, were found to require a considerable amount of computer time and memory space. Therefore, shortcuts for these calculations were developed, consisting mainly of correlative equations that can predict in a straightforward manner (1) the age of the pavement for any given condition; and (2) directly from the previous cycle, the subsequent parameters of the deterioration curve for any overlaid cycle.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Butt, A. A., Shahin, M. Y., Geighan, K. J., and Carpenter, S. H. (1987). “Pavement performance prediction model using the Markov process.”Transp. Res. Record 1123, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 12–19.
2.
Chen, X., Hudson, S., Cumberledge, G., and Perrone, E. (1995). “Pavement performance modeling program for Pennsylvania.”Transp. Res. Record 1508, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–8.
3.
George, K. P., Rajogopal, A. S., and Lim, L. K. (1989). “Models for predicting pavement deterioration.”Transp. Res. Record 1215, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–7.
4.
Guide for design of pavement structures. (1993). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
5.
Hajek, J. J., Phang, W. A., Prakash, A., and Wrong, G. A. (1985). “Performance prediction for pavement management.”Proc., North Am. Conf. on Managing Pavements, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications and U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Toronto, Ont., Canada, 4.122–4.134.
6.
Johnson, K. D., and Cation, K. A. (1992). “Performance prediction development using three indices for North Dakota pavement management system.”Transp. Res. Record 1344, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 22–30.
7.
Lee, Y. H., Mohseni, A., and Darter, M. I. (1993). “Simplified pavement performance models.”Transp. Res. Record 1397, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 7–14.
8.
Livneh, M. (1996a). “Deterioration modeling for life cycle cost analysis.”Proc., 1st Transp. Engrg. Spec. Conf., Vol. IIIb, The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Edmonton, Alberta, 123–134.
9.
Livneh, M. (1996b). “Deterioration modeling for unlaid and overlaid pavements.”Transp. Res. Record 1524, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 177–193.
10.
Livneh, M.(1996c). “Determination of residual life in flexible pavements.”Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, Canada, 23(5), 1012–1024.
11.
Lytton, R. L. (1987). “Concepts of pavement performance prediction and modeling.”Proc., 2nd North Am. Conf. on Managing Pavements, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Toronto, Ont., Canada, 2.3–2.20.
12.
Shahin, M. Y., Numez, M. M., Carpenter, S. H., and Sameh, A. (1987). “New techniques for modeling pavement deterioration.”Transp. Res. Record 1123, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 40–46.
13.
Smith, R. E., Darter, I. M., Carpenter, S. H., and Shahin, M. Y. (1987). “Adjusting performance curves for the influence of maintenance and rehabilitation.”Proc., 2nd North Am. Conf. on Managing Pavements, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Toronto, Ont., Canada, 2.399–2.410.
14.
Turner, D. S., Walters, J. V., Glover, T. C., and Mansfield, E. R. (1986). “An asphalt paving rating system on highway maintenance engineers experience.”Transp. Res. Record 1060, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 9–12.
15.
Van Gurp, C., Molenaar, A. A. A., Valk, H., and Van Velzen, F. J. M. (1984). “Testing the Delft University pavement management system.”Transp. Res. Record 997, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 28–40.
16.
Zimmerman, K. A., Heckel, L. B., Knox, R., and Babb, W. (1995). “Illinois pavement management system model development.”Proc., Transp. Congr., Vol. 1, ASCE, 635–650.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • June 1998
Pages: 63 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1998
Published in print: Jun 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.