Infrastructure Obsolescence and Design Service Life
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 2, Issue 4
Abstract
Infrastructure facilities generally have long service lifetimes. Major action is nevertheless eventually needed to overhaul, renovate, or sometimes demolish a facility that no longer provides satisfactory service. Sometimes obsolescence, brought on by changes in demands or technologies, motivates such action. Obsolete facilities—antiquated, old-fashioned, out-of-date—impose heavy burdens on their owners and users. Obsolescence, a concern throughout a facility's entire life cycle, reflects changed expectations regarding the function, profitability, or other dimension of performance that a facility is expected to provide. While such changes are primarily external, a facility's initial capabilities (e.g., durability of materials, flexibility of mechanical equipment) and how it is maintained influence the likelihood or timing of the onset of obsolescence. Obsolescence reduces the facility's service lifetime and for infrastructure may be the only meaningful technical basis for selecting a design service lifetime. This paper characterizes obsolescence as a concern for facility design and management, explores its sources, analyzes its impacts on infrastructure performance, and discusses how consideration of obsolescence might influence key infrastructure design and management parameters such as design service life and maintenance policy. The study of obsolescence can yield strategies for more effective infrastructure management, but warrants a multifaceted blending of theoretical analyses and practical observations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barlow, E. (1972). Frederick Law Olmsted's New York . Praeger, New York, N.Y.
2.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Gopinath, D.(1995). “Modeling infrastructure performance and user costs.”J. Infrastructure Syst., ASCE, 1(1), 33–43.
3.
“Bridge infrastructure: matching resources to the need.” (1991). Rep. Prepared for U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, General Accounting Ofc., Washington, D.C.
4.
“Building performance: function, preservation, and rehabilitation.” (1986). Proc., Symp. on Performance of Build. Constr., ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 901, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa.
5.
Downs, A. H. (1995). “The hidden impacts of obsolescence.”Nat. Real Estate Investor, Aug., 18–20.
6.
“Flashback.” (1992). Forbes, (Feb. 17), 187.
7.
Forrester, J. (1969). Urban dynamics . MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
8.
Garreau, J. (1991). Edge city: life on the new frontier . Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.
9.
Grigsby, W. (1967). Housing markets and public policy . University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, Pa.
10.
Grübler, A. (1990). The rise and fall of infrastructures: dynamics of evolution and technological change in transport . Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
11.
Hudson, W. R., Haas, R., and Pedigo, R. D. (1979). “Pavement management system development.”NCHRP Rep. 215. Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
12.
“Impact of air-pollution regulations on design criteria for boiler plants at federal facilities.” (1972). Tech. Rep. No. 63, Fed. Constr. Council, Nat. Acad. of Sci., Washington, D.C.
13.
In our own backyard: principles for improvement of the nation's infrastructure. (1993). A. C. Lemer and A. A. Grant, eds., Nat. Res. Council. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
14.
Karni, E., and Schmeidler, D.(1990). “Fixed preferences and changing tastes.”AEA Papers and Proc., 80(2), 262–267.
15.
Khalid, G.(1995). “Obsolescence in hedonic price estimation of the financial impact of commercial office buildings: the case of Kuala Lumpur.”Constr. Mgt. and Economics, 12(1), 37–44.
16.
Kirby, J. G., and Grgas, J. M. (1975). “Estimating the life expectancy of facilities.”Tech. Rep. P-36, U.S. Army Constr. Engrg. Res. Lab., Champaign, Ill.
17.
Lancaster, K.(1966). “A new approach to consumer theory.”J. Political Economy, 74, 132–157.
18.
Lemer, A. C. (1971). “Performance of systems of constructed facilities,” PhD thesis, Massachusetts Inst. of Technol., Cambridge, Mass.
19.
Lemer, A. C. (1992). “Measuring performance of airport passenger terminals.”Transp. Res.-A, 26A(1), 37–45.
20.
Marland, G., and Weinberg, A. (1988). “Longevity of infrastructure.”Cities and their vital systems, J. Ausubel and R. Herman, ed., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 312–332.
21.
Measuring and improving infrastructure performance. (1995). Nat. Res. Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
22.
Meikle, J. L., and Connaughton, J. N.(1994). “How long should housing last? Some implications of the age and probable life of housing in England.”Constr. Mgt. and Economy, 12(4), 315–321.
23.
Moehring, E. P. (1982). “Public works and urban history: recent trends and new directions.”Essays in Public Works History, No. 13, Public Works Historical Soc., Chicago, Ill.
24.
“New trucks for greater productivity and less road wear: an evaluation of the Turner proposal.” (1990). Spec. Rep. 227, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
25.
Performance of buildings and serviceability of facilities. (1990). ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 1029, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa.
26.
Pilzer, P. Z.(1989). “The real estate business and technological obsolescence.”Real Estate Rev., 19, 30–33.
27.
Proc., Joint RILEM-ASTM-CIB Symp. on the Perf. Concept in Buildings. (1972). ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa.
28.
Puri, S. P. S., Kratky, R. J., and Bruschi, M. G. (1994). “Performance of New York's long-span bridges (1801–1993).”Proc., 1st Congr. on Comp. in Civ. Engrg., Vol. 1, (1022–1031).
29.
Silverberg, G., Dosi, G., and Orsenigo, L.(1988). “Innovation, diversity, and diffusion: a self-organization model.”Econ. J., 98, 1032–1054.
30.
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
31.
Sjöström, C. (1985). “Overview of methodologies for prediction of service life.”Problems in service life prediction of building and construction materials, L. W. Masters, ed., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 3–26.
32.
Stoneman, P., and Ireland, N. J. (1983). “The role of supply-side factors in the diffusion of new process technology.”Econ. J. ( Supp .), 66–77.
33.
Tarr, J.(1979). “The separate vs. the combined sewer problem: a case in urban technology design choice.”J. Urban History, 5(3), 308–339.
34.
Vergara, C. J. (1995). Downtown Detroit: an American Acropolis. Plng., (Aug.), 18–19.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1996
Published in print: Dec 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.