Project Enhanced Learning: Addressing ABET Outcomes and Linking the Curriculum
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 135, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper discusses the development of project enhanced courses that combine the best of problem-based learning and traditional “topic” focused instruction. This approach addresses the need to ensure that students receive the technical content required while developing critical problem solving skills. This balance between skill development and technical content assurance is a key feature of this approach and a main difference to problem-based learning. It is also different from traditional approaches where a project is simply added to the tasks the students are expected to accomplish, and the impacts on student learning are significantly different. The paper presents a case study of the implementation of the projects into a junior level introductory structural analysis course, including details into the goals of the projects, and the changes made to make room for the projects. Assessment and evaluation of the impact of these projects include an evaluation on how the courses and projects address specific department and accreditation board for engineering and technology learning outcomes. Student perceptions are evaluated immediately at the conclusion of the course and substantially after the conclusion of the course (while in a senior design course), enabling the assessment of knowledge and skill transfer. Performance in this senior design course is also used to assess the impact of these projects by comparing students with: (1) a project enhanced experience; (2) a project added experience; and (3) no project experience in their structural analysis course. Those students with a project enhanced experience perform much better than students in either of the other groups in the follow-on course, and the contrast with a project added experience is particularly striking. The process of balancing the outcomes for this course with the needs of follow-on courses, and the tradeoffs that are needed to accomplish both could be applied to any junior level engineering course.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2006). “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs.” Engineering Accreditation Commission, Baltimore, ⟨http://www.abet.org/⟩.
ASCE. (2002). “ASCE-7 minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-02, Structural Engineering Institute, Reston, Va.
Barron, B. J. S. (1998). “Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning.” J. Learn. Sci., 7(3–4), 271–311.
Barroso, L. R., and Morgan, J. (2005). “Introducing projects into undergraduate structural analysis.” Proc., 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conf., ASCE, Texas A&M Univ. Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, Tex.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Capon, N., and Kuhn, D. (2004). “What’s so good about problem-based learning?” Cogn. Instruct., 22(1), 61–79.
Daniels, M., and Hauer, A. (2007). “Balancing scaffolding and complexity in open ended group projects.” Proc., Frontiers in Education Conf., ASEE/IEEE, Milwaukee.
Harding, T. S., Vanasupa, L., Savage, R. N., and Stolk, J. D. (2007). “Work-in-progress—Self-directed learning and motivation in a project-based learning environment.” Proc., Frontiers in Education Conf., ASEE/IEEE, Milwaukee.
Hyde, M. S., and Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). “Adjusting educational practice to increase female persistence in the sciences.” J. College Student Retention, 1(4), 335–355.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). “Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving outcomes.” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 5(1), 65–94.
Morgan, J., and Barroso, L. R. (2006). “Project enhanced learning in structural analysis.” Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Engineering Education (ICEE) (CD-ROM), Univ. of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR.
Morgan, J., Barroso, L. R., and Childs, D. (2004). “Integrating rigid body dynamics and vibrations: An introductory course for undergraduate civil engineers.” Proc., 2004 Int. Conf. on Engineering Education, Univ. of Florida, Gainsville, Fla.
National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2004). “The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century.” The National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2007). “Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future.” The National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Pintrich, P. R., and DeGroot, E. V. (1990). “Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.” J. Educ. Psychol. 82(1), 33–40.
Polman, J. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry, Teachers College Press, New York.
Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences, Westview Press, Colorado Springs, Colo.
Tobias, S. (1992). Revitalizing undergraduate science: Why some things work and most don’t, Research Corporation, Tucson, Ariz.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 135 • Issue 1 • January 2009
Pages: 11 - 20
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 20, 2006
Accepted: Mar 6, 2008
Published online: Jan 1, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.