Restructuring the Undergraduate Laboratory Instructional Process
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 133, Issue 3
Abstract
There is little doubt that a laboratory experience can be a beneficial component of the undergraduate engineering learning process. Observing physical demonstrations of textbook and lecture information can enhance a student’s perception of a concept and produce clarity of key issues. Unfortunately, limitations often exist that constrain the developing laboratories and sometimes reducing the student’s experience to little more than performing “cookbook” experiments and copying previous lab reports; an exercise that benefits neither the instructor nor the student. This paper summarizes an alternative approach for undergraduate laboratory instruction that relies on the undergraduate students working in teams to design and conduct experiments. The instructor acts as mentor to a process that ensures a quality laboratory exercise without being the sole responsible party. The students’ learning is increased and the laboratory experience is enhanced due, in part, to the experiments being designed by students and for students; matching students’ needs, education, and interests with experiments. An additional benefit comes from participants being immersed into the concepts of experimental design and analysis using a team of peers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET). (2003). “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Effective for evaluations during the 2002-2003 accreditation cycle.” ⟨http://www.abet.org/images/criteria/2002-03EACCriteria.pdf (Jan. 16, 2003).
Bella, D. A. (2003). “Plug and chug, cram, and flush.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 129(1), 32–39.
Buch, N. (2002). “Use of student management teams (SMTs) as a course evaluation tool.” J. Eng. Educ., 91(1), 125–131.
Chan, E., Chan, M., Scott, D., and Chan, A. (2002). “Educating the 21st century construction professionals.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 128(1), 44–51.
Christodoulou, S. (2004). “Educating civil engineering professionals of tomorrow.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 130(2), 90–94.
Felder, R. M., and Brent, B. (2003). “Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria.” J. Eng. Educ., 92(1), 7–25.
Jones, S. (2001). “Collaboration—A threat to academic autonomy.” Proc., ASCILITE Conf., Meeting at the Crossroads, Melbourne, Australia, ⟨http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/nov03/jones2.htm .
Koehn, E. (2001). “Assessment of communications and collaborative learning in civil engineering education.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 127(4), 160–165.
Ogot, M., Elliott, G., and Glumac, N. (2003). “An assessment of in-person and remotely operated laboratories.” J. Eng. Educ., 92(1), 57–64.
Ponton, M. K. (2002). “Motivating students by building self-efficacy.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 128(2), 54–57.
Roesset, J. M., and Yao, J. T. P. (2000). “Roles of civil engineering faculty.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 126(1), 8–15.
Semerjian, L., El-Fader, M., Zurayk, R., and Nuwayhid, I. (2004). “Interdisciplinary approach to environmental education.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 130(3), 173–181.
Splitt, F. G. (2003). “The challenge to change: On realizing the new paradigm for engineering education.” J. Eng. Educ., 92(2), 181–187.
Tagg, R. (2004). “Student-centered research.” Center for Learning through Applied Research and Innovation, Univ. of Coloradoat Denver, ⟨http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~rtagg/CLARIstyle/CLARIstyle_02.html .
Valdez, G. (2004). “Approaches to learning.” North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, ⟨http://www.ncrel.org/tandl /build2.htm⟩.
Wankat, P., and Oreovicz, F. (2003). “Getting homework to work.” ASEE Prism, 12(6), 42.
Wareham, D. G., and Milke, M. W. (2002). “Water quality laboratory for large civil engineering classes.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 128(2), 88–93.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 24, 2005
Accepted: Jun 7, 2006
Published online: Jul 1, 2007
Published in print: Jul 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.