Legal Framework for Alternative Dispute Resolution: Examination of the Singapore National Legal System for Arbitration
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 133, Issue 2
Abstract
Effectiveness of any alternative dispute resolution (ADR) method depends on the national legal system to which it is subjected. In Singapore, the increasing growth in the use of ADR methods may be adduced to developments in the Singapore legal environment. This paper reviews the characteristics of the Singapore national legal system for arbitration. It examines how the legal system facilitates effective use of ADR. By its features, the Singapore national legal system ensures parties’ autonomy but deters parties from taking opportunistic advantage of the voluntary nature of ADR. It enables procedural flexibility, and confidentiality of arbitration proceedings. It insulates the arbitration process from intervention from the Singapore courts and from corruption; and it provides maximum judicial support in the arbitral process. Hence, it ensures that disputes can be brought to a conclusion within a reasonable amount of time, at a reasonable cost, as well as preserving business relationships. The Singapore legal system insures the integrity of arbitration and the independence of arbitrators and arbitral institutions by immunity provisions. In addition, the legal system enhances the use of mediation and conciliation in a sequential tier with arbitration by providing a time limit for mediation or conciliation to terminate should they fail to produce a mutually acceptable settlement. In Singapore, the court system is generally known to be efficient; hence, ADR faces the practical challenge of becoming lengthier than court proceedings. The continuing search for and use of expedited arbitration procedures by arbitral institutions such as the Singapore International Arbitration Centre should reduce this challenge. This paper provides useful information on how a national legal system may be designed to support the use of ADR methods and facilitate their effectiveness.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers gratefully acknowledge the National University of Singapore and the Singapore Institute of Arbitrators (SIArb) under the Economic Development Board of Singapore (EDB) LEAP support, for providing funding for this research project.
References
Battelle, A. E. (1995). “The growing impact of ADR on the construction industry: ‘Real-time’ dispute processing on the Boston Central Artery/Tunnel project.” Constr. Lawyer, 15(4), 13.
Bonn, R. L. (1972). “Arbitration: An alternative system of handling contract related disputes.” Adm. Sci. Q., 17(2), 254–264.
Bühring-Uhle, C. (1996). Arbitration and mediation in international business, Kluwer Law International, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Chan, P. (2000). Arbitration as a form of dispute resolution in Singapore, Singapore Ministry of Law, Singapore.
Chan, P. (2003). “Legal developments affecting arbitration.” Singapore Institute of Arbitrators Newsletter, Singapore Institute of Arbitrators, Singapore.
Chan, P. (2004). “Legal developments affecting arbitration.” Singapore Institute of Arbitrators Newsletter, Singapore Institute of Arbitrators, Singapore.
Chan, P. (2005). “Legal developments affecting arbitration.” Singapore Institute of Arbitrators Newsletter, Singapore Institute of Arbitrators, Singapore.
Chantara-Opakorn, A. (2006). “Arbitration in Thailand.” International commercial arbitration in Asia, P. J. McConnaughay and T. B. Ginsburg, eds., JurisNet, New York, 403–444.
Cheung, S., Suen, H. C. H., and Lam, T., (2002). “Fundamentals of alternative dispute resolution processes in constructions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(5), 409–417.
Coulson, R. (1965). “Management arbitration in action.” Am. Bus. Law J., 3, 31–36.
DiDonato, L. (1993). Alternate methods to resolve contract disputes: Approaches to effective prevention, American Association of Cost Engineers, Morgantown, W.Va.
Goldberg, S. B., Sander, F. E. A., and Roger, N. H. (1992). Dispute resolution—Negotiation, mediation, and other processes, Little, Brown, Boston.
Li, N. T. N. and Su, D. W. (2006). “Arbitration in Taiwan, The Republic of China.” International commercial arbitration in Asia, P. J. McConnaughay and T. B. Ginsburg, eds., JurisNet, New York, 369–401.
McConnaughay, P. (2006). “Introduction.” International commercial arbitration in Asia, P. J. McConnaughay and T. B. Ginsburg, eds., JurisNet, New York, XXV–XL.
Pradhan, V. P. and Doi, V. (2006). “Arbitration in Malaysia.” International commercial arbitration in Asia, P. J. McConnaughay and T. B. Ginsburg, eds., JurisNet, New York, 235–279.
Rubin, R. A. and Quintas, B. V. (2003). “Alternative dispute resolution in U.S. public works: Proposed model.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 129(2), 80–83.
Tao, J. (2006). “Arbitration in China.” International commercial arbitration in Asia, P. J. McConnaughay and T. B. Ginsburg, eds., JurisNet, New York, 1–54.
Treacy, T. B. (1995). “Use of alternative dispute resolution in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng., 11(1), 58–63.
Uff, J. (1992). A pragmatic approach to arbitration: Legal obligations in construction, King’s College, London.
Yang, L. S. and Chew, L. (2006). “Arbitration in Singapore.” International commercial arbitration in Asia, P. J. McConnaughay and T. B. Ginsburg, eds., JurisNet, New York, 335–367.
York, S. (1996). Practical ADR, Pearson, London.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 6, 2005
Accepted: Jul 19, 2006
Published online: Apr 1, 2007
Published in print: Apr 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.