Insight into Resolving Construction Disputes by Mediation/Adjudication in Hong Kong
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 133, Issue 2
Abstract
Resolving construction disputes using an adversarial approach is considered to be in opposition of the maintenance of a harmonious relationship between two parties. The modern arbitration process may emulate the litigation proceeding leading to delay and cost escalation. During the past decade, the Hong Kong Government has implemented a mediation clause as an alternative mode for settlement of construction disputes. In this paper, the experience and insight into resolving construction disputes by integrating mediation and then arbitration in Hong Kong are highlighted. The state-of-the-art modern mediation process and its philosophical origins are reviewed. The shortcomings of the present system are pinpointed. The success of the adjudication now practiced in the United Kingdom may suggest that there is a place for another process of dispute resolution, which may help improve the situation. The prospect of the proposed mediation/adjudication and then arbitration mechanism is discussed with particular reference to the construction industry in Hong Kong.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Battelle, A. (1995). “The growing impact of ADR on the construction industry: ‘Real-time’ dispute processing on the Boston Artery/Tunnels project.” Constr. Lawyer, 15(4), 13.
Brooker, P., and Lavers, A. (1997). “Perceptions of alternate resolution as constraints upon use in the UK construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(6), 519–526.
Chau, K. W. (1992). “Resolving construction disputes by mediation: Hong Kong experience.” J. Manage. Eng., 8(4), 384–393.
Cheeks, J. R. (2003). “Multistep dispute resolution in design and construction industry.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 129(2), 84–91.
Cheng, F. T. (1947). “China moulded by Confucius.” The library of world affairs, 2 Ed., G. W. Keeton and G. Schwarzenberger, eds., Stevens & Sons, London.
Cottam, G., O’Reilly, M., and Ryan, E. (2002). “Statutory construction adjudication: Four years on.” Proc. Inst. of Civ. Eng. (UK), 150(2), 75–80.
Creel, H. G. (1960). Confucius and the Chinese way, Harper, New York.
Cronin-Harris, C. (1996). “Mainstreaming: Systematizing corporate use of ADR.” Albany Law Rev., 59, 847–847.
Egan, J., Sir. (1998). “Rethinking construction.” The Egan Rep., Construction Task Force, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London.
Folberg, J., and Taylor, A. (1984). Mediation—A comprehensive guide to resolving conflicts without litigation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Hall, D. L., and Ames, R. T. (1987). Thinking through Confucius, State University of New York Press, Albany, N.Y.
Harmon, K. M. J. (2003). “Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies.” Leadership Manage. Eng., 3(4), 187–201.
Holland, D. E. (1989). “Conciliation or mediation of construction contract disputes.” Arbitration, 55(3), 208–211.
Hong Kong Government. (1984). “Administrative guidelines for the trial mediation scheme.” Lands & Works Branch Technical Circular No. 10/84, Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong Government. (1985). General conditions of contract for civil engineering works, Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong Government. (1989). “Administrative guidelines for mediation in construction disputes.” Lands and Works Branch Technical Circular No. 8/89, Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong Government. (1991). Hong Kong Government mediation rules, Hong Kong Government, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong Institution of Engineers. (1985). Hong Kong Institution of Engineers mediation services rules, Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, Hong Kong.
Johnson, H. M., and Singh, A. (1998). “Conflict management diagnosis at project management organizations.” J. Manage. Eng., 14(5), 48–63.
Johnston, R. F. (1934). Confucianism and modern China—The Lewis Fry Memorial Lectures 1933–34 at Bristol University, Gollancz, London.
Keil, J. H. (1999). “Hybrid ADR in the construction industry.” Dispute Resolut. J., 54(3), 14–22.
Kennedy, P., and Milligan, J. L. (2005). “Research analysis of the progress of adjudication based on returned questionnaires from adjudicator nominating bodies (ANDs) and on questionnaires returned by adjudicators.” Adjudication Rep. No. 7, School of the Built and Natural Environment, Caledonian Univ., Glasgow, U.K.
Latham, M. (1994). “Constructing the team.” Final Rep., Joint Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the United Kingdom Construction Industry, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London.
Lau, D. C. (1983). Confucius: The analects (Lun Yu)—The sayings of Confucius, Chinese University Press, Hong Kong.
Lewis, S. (1999). “The Housing Grants, Construction, and Regeneration Act 1996.” Proc. Inst. of Civ. Eng. (UK), 132(2/3), 125–131.
Lewis, S. J. (1997). “Adjudication.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Munic. Eng., 121(3), 156–160.
Li, F. C. (1986). The Confucian way: A new and systematic study of “The Four Books,” KPI, New York.
Louie, K. (1980). Critiques of Confucius in contemporary China, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Molloy, J. B. (2003). “Does Hong Kong need adjudication?” Hong Kong Eng., 31(8), 10.
Rouse, D. (1988). “Mediation—The state-of-the-art in 1987: A South African viewpoint.” Arbitration, 54(2), 102–104.
Soo, G. (2001). “The do’s and dont’s of mediation.” Hong Kong Eng., 29(1), 33–35.
Stipanowich, T. J. (1997). “At the cutting edge: Conflict avoidance and resolution in the US construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(6), 505–512.
Strathern, P. (2002). The essential Confucius, Virgin, London.
Treacy, T. B. (1995). “Use of alternative dispute resolution in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng., 11(1), 58–63.
Tu, W. M. (1985). Confucian thought: Self-hood as creative transformation, State University of New York Press, Albany, N.Y.
Vaughan, T. (2000a). “Adjudication update.” Proc. Inst. of Civ. Eng. (UK), 138(1), 8.
Vaughan, T. (2000b). “Courts take positive approach to adjudication.” Proc. Inst. of Civ. Eng. (UK), 138(3), 104.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 133 • Issue 2 • April 2007
Pages: 143 - 147
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 21, 2005
Accepted: Jul 19, 2006
Published online: Apr 1, 2007
Published in print: Apr 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.