Design Engineers’ Responses to Safety Situations
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 133, Issue 2
Abstract
How a consulting design civil engineer would respond to two site safety situations would depend on the decision criterion the engineer chooses. One situation is observing a site condition that poses a hazard to construction workers. A second situation is choosing during the design process between a traditional component and one that is more expensive but inherently less risky for the construction workers. Potential decision criteria determining the engineer’s responses to these situations include maximizing the firm’s profits, complying with the firm’s contract with the client, complying with federal safety standards, complying with ASCE’s policy on construction site safety, and complying with ASCE’s Code of Ethics. The paper also discusses how the responses to these situations would be slightly different for an engineering manager and if the engineer was part of a design-build team. The results of this theoretical analysis suggest that engineering firms should establish site safety-related policies and that changes may be warranted in ASCE’s Code of Ethics and the federal safety standards.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writer appreciates the thoughtful comments from two anonymous reviewers.
References
ASCE. (2001). “Policy statement on construction site safety no. 350.” http://www.constructioninst.org/files/pdf/PS350.pdf (January 16, 2007).
ASCE, American Consulting Engineering Council, and National Society of Professional Engineers. (2002a). “Standard form of agreement between owner and engineer for professional services (E-500).”
ASCE, American Consulting Engineering Council, and National Society of Professional Engineers. (2002b). “Standard general conditions of the contract between owner and design builder (D-700).”
Gambatese, J. A. (2000). “Safety in designer’s hands.” Civ. Eng. (N.Y.), 70(6), 56–59.
Gambatese, J. A., Hinze, J., and Behm, M. (2004). “Investigation of viability of designing for safety.” http://www.cpwr.com/pdfs/pubs/research_pubs/krgambatese.pdf (January 16, 2007)
Gambatese, J. A., Hinze, J., and Haas, C. T. (1997). “Tool to design for construction worker safety.” J. Archit. Eng., 3(1), 32–41.
Hinze, J. (2000). “Designing for the life cycle safety of facilities.” Proc., Designing for Safety and Health, A. G. F. Gibb, ed., European Construction Institute, Loughorough, England.
Hinze, J., and Wiegand, F. (1992). “Role of designers in construction worker safety.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(4), 677–684.
Hogarth, R. M. (1980). Judgment and choice: The psychology of decision, Wiley, New York.
Pindyck, R. S., and Rubinfeld, D. L. (1989). Microeconomics, Macmillan, New York.
Rubio, M. C., Menéndez, A., Rubio, J. C., and Martínez, G. (2005). “Obligations and responsibilities of civil engineers for the prevention of labor risks: References to European regulations.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 131(1), 70–75.
Toole, T. M. (2002). “Construction site safety roles.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(3), 203–210.
Toole, T. M. (2005a). “Increasing engineers’ role in construction safety: Opportunities and barriers.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 131(3), 199–207.
Toole, T. M. (2005b). “A new era for engineers and construction safety?” Means, methods, and trends 1(1), http://www.mmtmagazine.org (January 16, 2007).
Toole, T. M., and Marquis, S. (2004). “Site safety attitudes of US and UK design engineers.” Proc., Research and Practice Symp., on Designing for Safety and Health in Construction, S. Hecker, J. Gambatese, and M. Weinstein, eds., University of Oregon Press, Eugene, Ore.
U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL), Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (1999). “Directive CPL 2-0.124—Multi-employer citation policy.” http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=DIRECTIVES&p_id=2024 (January 16, 2007).
U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL), Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2004). “Occupational safety and health standards for the construction industry.” 29 CFR 1926, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Vesilind, P. A. (1995). “Evolution of the American Society of Civil Engineers code of ethics.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 121(1), 4–10.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 133 • Issue 2 • April 2007
Pages: 126 - 131
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 16, 2005
Accepted: May 19, 2006
Published online: Apr 1, 2007
Published in print: Apr 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.