LEGAL AFFAIRS SECTION
Jan 1, 2006

Incorporating Contractual Incentives to Facilitate Relational Contracting

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 132, Issue 1

Abstract

Construction projects are undertaken by many parties, all with their own goals and motivations which may not always be aligned. Furthermore, they are governed by contracts, which do not necessarily produce win-win outcomes. The aims of this study are (1) to compare the views of contractors, clients, and consultants on factors facilitating and deterring relational contracting (RC); and (2) to investigate the use of contractual incentives to increase the effectiveness of RC. Structured questionnaires were sent by post to randomly selected construction industry players in Singapore to find out factors that enable RC and the barriers that impede the formation of RC. The results show that RC can be facilitated by having top management support, alignment of project objectives, relationship building, and most importantly, appropriate contractual incentives. In most instances, contractors gave a lower level of importance to many of the factors than clients and consultants. It is concluded that more contractual incentives should be provided in contracts in order to evoke the desired relational approaches.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers thank M. M. Kumaraswamy for the permission to use the questionnaire conceived by him and his team in Hong Kong. S. T. Phng’s collation of contractor respondents’ data is acknowledged with thanks.

References

Ang, Y. K., and Ofori, G. (2001). “Chinese culture and successful implementation of partnering in Singapore’s construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 19(6), 619–632.
Bayliss, R., Cheung, S. O., Suen, H. C. H., and Wong, S. P. (2004). “Effective partnering tools in construction: A case study on MTRC TKE contract 604 in Hong Kong.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 22(2), 253–263.
Bayramoglu, S. (2001). “Partnering in construction: Improvement through integration and collaboration.” Leadership Manage. Eng., 1(3), 39.
Chan, A. P. C., et al. (2004). “Exploring critical success factors for partnering in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(2), 188–198.
Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., and Ho, K. S. K. (2003). “Partnering in construction: Critical study of problems for implementation.” J. Manage. Eng., 19(3), 126–135.
Cheng, E. W. L., and Li, H. (2004). “Development of a practical model of partnering for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(6), 790.
Construction 21. (1999). Re-inventing construction, Singapore: Ministry of Manpower and Ministry of National Development.
Crowley, L. G., and Karim, M. A. (1995). “Conceptual model of partnering.” J. Manage. Eng., 11(5), 33–39.
Dulaimi, M. F., Ling, F. Y. Y., Ofori, G., and Nayanthara, D. S. (2002). “Enhancing integration and innovation in construction.” Build. Res. Inf., 30(4), 237–247.
Glagola, C. R., and Sheedy, W. M. (2002). “Partnering on defense contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(2), 127–138.
Goetz, C. J., and Scott, R. E. (1981). “Principles of relational contracting.” Va. Law Rev., 67(6), 1089–1150.
Harback, H. F., Basham, D. L., and Buhts, R. E. (1994). “Partnering paradigm.” J. Manage. Eng., 10(1), 23–27.
Hartman, F., Snelgrove, P., and Ashrafi, R. (1997). “Effective wording to improve risk allocation in lump sum contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(4), 379–387.
Hughes, W., and Maeda, Y. (2002). Construction contract policy: Do we mean what we say? RICS Research Papers, 4(12), RICS, U.K.
Kumaraswamy, M. M., Rahman, M. M., Ling, F. Y. Y., and Phng, S. T. (2005). “Reconstruction cultures for relational contracting.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(10), 1065–1075.
Ling, Y. Y., Ofori, G., and Low, S. P. (2000). “Importance of design consultants’ soft skills in design-build projects.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 7(4), 389–398.
Macaulay, S. (1963). “Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study.” Am. Sociol. Rev., 28(1), 55–67.
Macneil, I. R. (1974). “The many futures of contracts.” Southern California Law Rev., 47(3), 691–816.
Mohr, J., and Spekman, R. (1994). “Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques.” Strategic Manage. J., 15(2), 135–152.
Ofori, G. (2002). “Singapore’s construction: Moving toward a knowledge-based industry.” Build. Res. Inf., 30(6), 401–412.
Rahman, M. M. (2003). “Revitalizing construction project procurement through joint risk management.” PhD thesis, the Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Rahman, M. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2002a). “Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 20(1), 45–54.
Rahman, M. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2002b). “Risk management trends in the construction industry: Moving towards joint risk management.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 9(2), 131–151.
Rahman, M. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2004a). “Contracting relationship trends and transitions.” J. Manage. Eng., 20(4), 147–161.
Rahman, M. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2004b). “Potential for implementing relational contracting and joint risk management.” J. Manage. Eng., 20(4), 178–189.
Rahman, M. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2005). “Assembling integrated project teams for joint risk management.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 23(4), 365–375.
Robinson, N. M., Laver, A. P., Tan, G. K. H., and Chan, R. (1996). Construction law in Singapore and Malaysia, 2nd Ed., Butterworths Asia, Singapore.
Sze, E., Kumaraswamy, M., Wong, T., Yeung, N., and Rahman, M. (2003). “Weak links in ‘partnering’ supply chains? Consultants’ and subcontractors’ views on project partnering.” S. M. Ahmed, I. Ahmad, S. L. Tang, and S. Azhar, eds., Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC II): Sustainability and Innovation in Management and Technology, Hong Kong, 108–113.
Thompson, P. J., and Sanders, S. R. (1998). “Partnering continuum.” J. Manage. Eng., 14(5), 73–78.
Walker, A., and Chau, K. K. (1999). “The relationship between construction project management theory and transaction cost economics.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 6(2), 166–176.
Zaghloul, R., and Hartman, F. (2003). “Construction contracts: The cost of mistrust.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 21, 419–424.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 132Issue 1January 2006
Pages: 57 - 66

History

Received: Feb 8, 2005
Accepted: Jul 5, 2005
Published online: Jan 1, 2006
Published in print: Jan 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Florence Yean Yng Ling [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Building, National Univ. of Singapore, 4 Architecture Dr., Singapore 117566 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
M. Motiar Rahman [email protected]
Post Doctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Rd., Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]
Lecturer, Institute of Technical Education, 114 Balestier Rd., Singapore 329679. E-mail: ng̱tiong̱[email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share