Globalization Challenges, Legacies, and Civil Engineering Curriculum Reform
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 131, Issue 2
Abstract
Across nations and industries, numerous changes are taking place due to globalization. Naturally, the effects are channelled back to the academic world and prominently felt at the level of higher learning in view of its constant contact with the industries. Universities and institutions have to reassess the adequacy of their existing curricula in fulfilling the needs arising from globalization. With reference to issues encountered in southeast Asia, this paper examines the necessity to rethink the curriculum of a baccalaureate degree in civil engineering and presents some recommendations for revamping the curricular structure. The context discussed is most relevant to small, developing countries, but generally concerns those countries with a legacy of educational systems similar to this region. One rising trend is the move toward a general engineering education at the undergraduate level; a professional degree is emphasized only at the master’s level. More management-related subjects may be included in the undergraduate curriculum to equip engineers with skills to cope with globalization challenges.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
“A Panda Breaks the Formation.” (2001). The Economists, August 23.
ASCE Task Committee on the Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice. (2002). “Policy statement 465: Why we must raise the bar.” Civ. Eng. Mag., 72(4), 94–95.
Bonasso, S. G. (2001). “Engineering, leadership, and integral philosophy.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 127(1), 17–25.
Bordogna, J. (1998). “Tomorrow’s civil systems engineer—the master integrator.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 124(2), 48–50.
Chinowsky, P. S. (2002). “Integrating management breadth in civil engineering education.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 128(3), 138–143.
“Choice, Choices: NTU to Engineer New Breed of Grad.” (2003). The Straits Times, March 5.
Engineering Council (UK). (1997). Standards and Routes to Registration (SARTOR) Part 1, 3rd Ed., London.
Farr, J. V. (1997a). “Education reform: Pros and cons.” J. Manage. Eng., 13(6), 34–36.
Farr, J. V. (1997b). “Engineering education: The challenge of reform.” J. Manage. Eng., 13(6), 3–4.
Florman, S. C. (1989). The civilized engineer, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Garvin, M. J., Smyth, A., Sommer, P., and Lall, U. (2002). “Instructional and technological innovations to attract and retain undergraduates to engineer the built environment.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Engineering Education, Manchester, U. K.
Grigg, N. S. (2000). “Demographics and industry employment of civil engineering workforce.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 126(3), 116–124.
Miller, J. B. (2000). Principles of public and private infrastructure delivery, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Miller, J. B. (2002). “The civil engineer in society—public policy, public office, and community service.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 128(4), 161–163.
Palmer, S. R. (2003). “Framework for undergraduate engineering management studies.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 129(2), 92–99.
Schneck, D. J. (2002). “Educating students to be creative problem solvers as 21st century engineers.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 128(3), 100–106.
Tulacz, G. L. (2003). “New global spending forecast highlights: Risks and rewards.” Engineering News Record, June 30, 47–48.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 4, 2003
Accepted: Mar 23, 2004
Published online: Apr 1, 2005
Published in print: Apr 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.