Dispute Review Boards: Elements of a Convincing Recommendation
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 130, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper will discuss the dispute review board (DRB) process and in particular the settlement recommendation and the elements thereof that may induce contractual parties to resolve their conflict. The recommendation is a document issued after the contractual parties bring a dispute to the DRB panel that they have failed to resolve. To lay the foundation for the issuance of a recommendation, the DRB process will be briefly discussed. Also discussed is the groundwork the panel itself must lay to gain the parties trust prior to the issuance of any recommendation. Given the importance of the recommendation as a linchpin of the DRB process, it is surprising to note the dearth of literature regarding it. This paper will help to partially fill that void.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, E., and Weitz, B. (1992). “The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels.” Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 18–34.
2.
Bies, R. J. (1987). “Beyond “voice”: The influence of decision-maker justification and sincerity on procedural fairness judgments.” Representative Research in Social Psychology, 17(11), 3–14.
3.
Bies, R.J., and Moag, J.S. ( 1986). “Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness.” Research on negotiations in organizations, Vol. 1, R. Bies, R. Lewicki, and B. Sheppard, eds., JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 43–55.
4.
Castleberry, S. B., and Shepard, C. D. (1993), “Effective interpersonal listening and personal selling.” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 13, 35–49.
5.
Churchill, G. A., Ford, N. M., Hartley, S. W., and Walker, O. C., Jr. (1985). “The determinations of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis.” Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 103–118.
6.
Cropanzano, R. ( 1993). Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
7.
Cropanzano, R., and Greenberg, J. ( 1997). “Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze.” International review of industrial and organizational psychology, C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson, eds., Wiley, New York, 317–372.
8.
Dawson, L. E., Jr., Soper, B., and Pettijohn, C. E. (1992). “The effects of empathy of salesperson effectiveness.” Psychology and Marketing9, 297–310.
9.
Farace, R., Monge, P., and Russell, H. ( 1977). Communicating and organizing, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
10.
Folger, R. (1977). “Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity.” J. Pers Soc. Psychol., 35(2), 108–119.
11.
Ford, N.M., Walker, O.C., Churchill, G.A., Jr., and Hartley, S.W. ( 1987). “Selecting successful salespeople: A meta-analysis of biographical and psychological selection criteria.” Review of Marketing, Michael J. Houston ed., American Marketing Association, Chicago, 103–104.
12.
Glazer, R., Kahn, B. E., and Moore, W. L. (1991). “The influence of external constraints on brand choice: The-lone alternative effect.” J. Consum. Res., 18, 119–127.
13.
Greenberg, J. (1986). “Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.” J. Appl. Psychol., 71, 340–342.
14.
Greenberg, J. (1987). “A taxonomy or organizational justice theories.” Academy of Management Review, 12, 9–22.
15.
Greenberg, J. (1990). “Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice.” Research in Organization Behavior, 12, 111–157.
16.
Greenberg, J., Bies, R.J., and Eskew, D.E. ( 1991). “Establishing fairness in the eyes of the beholder.” Applied impression management: How image-making affects managerial decisions, A. Giacalone and P. Rosenfeld, eds., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 111–132.
17.
Harmon, K.M. J. ( 2002). “Mediation: Satisfaction in the process and outcome.” Construction Briefings, 6.
18.
Harmon, K. M. J. (2003). “Construction conflicts and dispute review boards: Attitudes and opinions of construction industry members.” Dispute Resolution Journal, 58(4), 66–75.
19.
Hauser, J. R. (1986). “Agendas and consumer choice.” Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 199–212.
20.
Heimovics, R. D. (1984). “Trust and influence in an ambiguous group setting.” Small Group Behavior, 15(4), 545–552.
21.
Hirschman, A.O. ( 1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
22.
Kahn, B., Moore, W. L., and Glazer, R. (1987). “Experiments in Constrained Choice.” J. Consum. Res., 14, 96–113.
23.
Leventhal, G.S. ( 1976). “The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations.” L. Berkowitz and E. Walster, eds. “Advances in experimental social psychology,” Vol. 9, Academic, San Diego, 91–131.
24.
Leventhal, G.S. ( 1980). “What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships.” Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, K. J. Gerge, et al. eds., Plenum, New York, 27–55.
25.
Leventhal, G.S., Karuza, J., and Fry, W.R. ( 1980). “Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences.” Justice and social interaction,G. Mikula ed., Springer, New York, 167–218.
26.
Lind, E.A., and Tyler, T.R. ( 1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum, New York.
27.
Mohr, J. J., and Nevin, J. (1990). “Communication strategies in marketing channels: A theoretical perspective.” J. Marketing, 50, 36–51.
28.
Morgan, R. M., and Hunt, S. D. (1994). “The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing.” J. Marketing, 58, 20–38.
29.
Rentz, J. O., Shepard, C. D., Taschian, A., Dabholkar, P. A., and Ladd, R. T. (2002). “A measure of selling skill: Scale development and validation.” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 23(1), 13–21.
30.
Roberts, K. H., and, O’Reilly, C. A. (1979). “Some correlates of communication roles in organizations.” Acad. Manage J. 22, 42–57.
31.
Schultz, R. J., and Evans, K. R. (2002). “Strategic collaborative communication by key account representatives.” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 22(1), 23–31.
32.
Smith, D. C., and Owens, J. P. (1995). “Knowledge of customers’ customers as a basis of sales force differentiation.” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 15, 1–16.
33.
Solomon, R.C., and Flores, F. ( 2001). “Building trust in business, politics, relationships, and life, Oxford University Press, New York.
34.
Tyler, T.R., and Bies, R. ( 1990). “Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice.” Applied social psychology and organizational settings, J. Carroll, ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 77–98.
35.
Tyler, T. R., and Folger, R. (1980). “Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters.” Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 1(4), 281–292.
36.
Vermunt, R., van der Kloot, W. A., and Van der Meer, J. (1993). “The effect of procedural justice and interactional criteria on procedural fairness judgments.” Social Justice Research, 6(2), 183–194.
37.
Wagner, J. A., Klein, N. M., and Keith, J. E. (2001). “Selling strategies: The effects of suggesting a decision structure to novice and expert buyers.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(3), 289–306.
38.
Walker, O. C., Churchill, G. A., Jr., and Ford, N. M. (1977). “Motivation and performance in industrial selling: Present knowledge and needed research.” Journal of Marketing Research14, 156–168.
40.
Weitz, B. A. (1981). “Effectiveness in sales interactions: a contingency framework. J. Marketing, 45(Winter), 85–103.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 2004
Published in print: Oct 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.