Integrated Civil Engineering Curriculum: Five-Year Review
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 130, Issue 3
Abstract
An integrated curriculum, which draws material from different areas to teach students about design and problem-solving, offers civil engineering educators an option for accommodating new topics without increasing the number of courses. Freshman engineering and the senior capstone course are two examples of integrated courses, and the writers present a 5-year perspective on an approach that extends the concept of integration to six additional courses, comprised of an 8-course, integrated civil engineering core curriculum. Drawing on their combined experiences with the courses and assessment in a review by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, the writers conclude that the curriculum offers a useful vehicle by which to add material to the 4-year program without increasing the number of credit hours, and offers flexible courses to meet goals of professional groups. The paper describes lessons learned, challenges that remain, and current approaches to improvement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Al-Holou, N., et al. (1999). “First-year integrated curricula: Design alternatives and examples.” J. Eng. Educ., 88(4), 435–448.
Bergeron, H. E.(2001). “A perspective on the need to give an introduction to engineering management to all engineering students.” J. Leadership Manage. Eng.,1(1), 26–29.
Corradini, M., and Farrell, P. (1995). “A team-based design course for freshman. Investing in the future.” 1995 Annual Conf. Proc., American Society for Engineering Education.
Courter, S. S., Millar, S. B., and Lyons, L.(1998). “From the students’ point of view: Experiences in a freshman engineering design course.” J. Eng. Educ., 87(3), 283–288.
Dally, J. W., and Zhang, M. G.(1993). “A freshman engineering design course.” J. Eng. Educ., 82(2), 83–91.
Dym, C.(1994). “Teaching design to freshman: Style and content.” J. Eng. Educ., 83(4), 303–310.
Einstein, H. H.(2002). “Engineering change at MIT.” Civ. Eng. (N.Y.), 72(10), 62–72.
Everett, L. J., Imbrie, P. K., and Morgan, J.(2000). “Integrated curricula: Purpose and design.” J. Eng. Educ., 89(2), 167–175.
Grigg, N., Criswell, M. E., and Siller, T. J.(1996). “Integrated civil engineering curriculum: Implementation and management.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 122(4), 151–155.
Grigg, N., Criswell, M. E., Fontane, D. G., and Siller, T. J. (2001). Civil engineering practice in the twenty-first century, ASCE, New York.
Hatton, D. M., Wankat, P. C., and LeBold, W. K.(1998). “The effects of an orientation course on the attitudes of freshman engineering students.” J. Eng. Educ., 87(1), 23–27.
Holliday-Darr, K., and Young, J. H. (1995). “An innovative approach to incorporating design into the freshman year.” Investing in the Future, 1995 Annual Conf. Proc., American Society for Engineering Education.
Kolar, R. L., Muraleetharan, K. K., Mooney, M. A., and Vieux, B. E.(2000). “Sooner city design across the curriculum.” J. Eng. Educ., 89(1), 79–87.
Merritt, T. R., Murman, E. M., and Friedman, D.(1997). “Engaging freshman through advisor seminars.” J. Eng. Educ., 86(1), 29–34.
Seat, E., Parsons, J. R., and Poppen, W. A.(2001). “Enabling engineering performance skills: A program to teach communication, leadership, and teamwork.” J. Eng. Educ., 90(1), 7–12.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 3, 2002
Accepted: Aug 7, 2003
Published online: Jun 15, 2004
Published in print: Jul 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.