evaluate-Med: Prototype Web-based Mediator Assessment System for Role-Plays
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 130, Issue 2
Abstract
Over the decade, mediation has rapidly become a popular method to deal with disputes. It is now widely used by companies and organizations all over the world. As a result, a great number of mediation training programs have been set up to promote and educate the use and skills of mediation. Generally speaking, a typical training program would consist of the following four basic components: (1) lecture, (2) group discussion, (3) mediation simulations, and (4) role-plays. Out of the four, the use of role-plays to simulate real-life mediations are well-received by both trainers and trainees. Not only does it form an integral part of any effective mediation training program, but it also helps achieve the objectives of training programs through assessment of the role-play performance. Through assessment of role-play performance, it is possible to identify areas of strengths and weaknesses, so as to improve the quality of ongoing trainings. As a response to the request of a more systematic approach to improve the assessment of role-plays, this paper describes a Web-based mediator assessment system (evaluate-Med). The aim is to develop a flexible and simple system of assessing of mediators’ skills in role-plays. The system is based on Internet and database technologies and the process of development includes the following three key components: framework for the design of mediator’s performance measures, mediator assessment form, and mediator assessment summary. The use of evaluate-Med can systemize, streamline, and automate the performance assessment process in role-plays. The use of graphs and charts to present assessment results is invaluable to trainers, assessors, and trainee mediators in comparing results and benchmarking. In addition, it allows effective monitoring of a mediator’s performance in a role-play or over a series of role-plays and helps the overall design and development of a mediation training program.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Bar Association (ABA). (2002). “Dispute resolution.” Dispute resolution section, 〈http://www.abanet.org/dispute/home〉 (Oct. 15, 2003).
Arkansas Alternative Dispute Resolution Commission. (2001). “Minimum standards for basic mediation training by the Arkansas Alternative Dispute Resolution Commission.” Dispute Resolution Commission, 〈http://www.courts.state.ar.us/pdf/〉 (Oct. 15, 2003).
Brassard, M. (1989). “GOAL/QPC.” The memory jogger plus+, Methuen, Mass.
Bush, R.(1993). “Mixed messages in the interim guidelines.” Negotiation J., 9, 341–348.
Bush, R., and Folger, J. (1994). “Mediation skills and knowledge.” The promise of mediation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Campus Mediation Program (CMP). (2002). “Assessment toolkit.” Campus mediation program, 〈http://www.campus-adr.org/CR_Services_Cntr/Assessment〉 (Oct. 15, 2003).
Casanova, C. (2002). “Mediation for school counselors—The mediation process overview.” Mediation at school, 〈http://www.guidancechannel.com/〉 (Oct. 15, 2003).
Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR). (2002). “CEDR’s mission is to encourage and develop mediation and other cost-effective dispute resolution.” Dispute resolution section, 〈http://www.cedr.co.uk/〉 (Oct. 15, 2003).
Cheung, S., and Suen, H.(2002a). “The contributions of neutral third party towards amicable construction dispute resolution.” Int. Constr. Law Rev., 19(1), 79–86.
Cheung, S., and Suen, H.(2002b). “A multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 20(7), 557–568.
Cheung, S., Suen, H., and Lam, T.(2002). “The fundamentals of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(5), 409–417.
Crane, T., Felder, J., Thompson, P., Thompson, M., and Sanders, S.(1999). “Partnering measures.” J. Manage. Eng., 15(2), 37–42.
Dingwall, R.(1993). “Does Caveat Emptor alone help potential users of mediation.” Negotiation J., 9, 331–334.
Friedman, G., and Silberman, A.(1993). “A useful tool for evaluating potential mediators.” Negotiation J., 9, 313–315.
Herrman, M., Hollett, N., Gale, J., and Foster, M.(2001). “In practice—Defining mediator knowledge and skills.” Negotiation J., 17, 139–153.
Honeyman, C.(1988). “Five elements of mediations.” Negotiation J., 4, 149–158.
Honeyman, C.(1990). “On evaluating mediators.” Negotiation J., 6, 23–36.
Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC). (2002). “Hong Kong mediation council-mediator assessment form.” Mediation forms, 〈http://www.hkiac.com〉 (Oct. 27, 2003).
Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia (IAMA). (2002). “Dispute resolution services across Australia: Asia and the Pacific.” Dispute resolution section, 〈http://www.iama.org.au/〉 (Oct. 15, 2003).
Kolb, D., and Kolb, J.(1993). “All the mediators in the garden.” Negotiation J., 9, 335–339.
Kraybill, R. (2000). “Mediation techniques.” Mediation and facilitation training manual, PA, Akron, Ohio.
Markwood, A. (2001). “The fourth R.” The newsletter of the National Association for Mediation in Education (NAME), NAME.
Matz, D.(1993). “Some advice for mediator evaluators.” Negotiation J., 9, 327–330.
Menkel-Meadow, C.(1993). “Measuring both the art and science of mediation.” Negotiation J., 9, 321–325.
MySQL. (2002). “MySQL is the world’s most popular open source database.” MySQL homepage, 〈http:///www.mysql.com〉 (Oct. 15, 2003).
PHP. (2000). Professional PHP programming, Wrox, U.K.
Red Hat. (2002). “Red Hat training.” Official web site of Red Hat Linux, 〈http://www.redhat.com〉 (Oct. 15, 2003).
Rogers, N., and Salem, R. (1987). A student’s guide to mediation and the law, Matthew Bender, New York.
Saaty, T. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sibey, S.(1993). “Mediation mythology.” Negotiation J., 9, 349–353.
Shaw, M. (1993). “Selection, training and qualification of neutrals.” A working paper for the National Symposium on court-connected dispute resolution research, State Justice Institute, Washington, D.C.
Stulberg, J. (1983). Manual for beginning mediators, Conflict Management Resources Inc., New York.
Test Design Project. (1993). Interim guidelines for selecting mediators, National Institute for Dispute Resolution, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 130 • Issue 2 • April 2004
Pages: 142 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 28, 2003
Accepted: Nov 26, 2003
Published online: Mar 15, 2004
Published in print: Apr 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.