TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 2001

Civil Engineers and Future Environmental Policies

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 127, Issue 3

Abstract

The nation has achieved substantial progress over the past 30 years in improving environmental conditions throughout the United States. Civil engineers have played leadership roles in achieving this progress. Today, there is considerable discussion about the direction and means of achieving further environmental protection. Civil engineers have both an obligation and a right to participate in these discussions. But obligations and rights will not ensure that engineers exert leadership and a positive influence on these key policy discussions. The profession must take a close look at how it can most effectively participate in the policy debates that will shape the future of environmental policy. This paper examines the roles that civil engineers can play in formulation of environmental policy. It suggests that civil engineers build on their strengths of design of the environment grounded in physical science, by analyzing the entire environmental management system, thinking in terms of outcomes, and considering a broad range of alternatives. The paper suggests that civil engineers need to attend more closely to sustainable development and pollution prevention as substantive areas for engagement beyond the traditional design of waste treatment systems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). ( 1998). “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” ASCE, Reston, Va.
2.
ASCE. ( 1995). “The new strategic plan ASCE 2000 working drawings for the 21st Century.” ASCE News, 20(12), 9–12.
3.
ASCE. ( 1997). “Policy statement 412: Environmental engineering.” ASCE, Reston, Va.
4.
ASCE. ( 1998a). “Policy statement 356: Environmental auditing for regulatory compliance.” ASCE, Reston, Va.
5.
ASCE. ( 1998b). “Policy statement on pollution management.” ASCE, Reston, Va.
6.
ASCE. ( 1998c). “Policy statement 139: Public involvement in the decision-making process.” ASCE, Reston, Va.
7.
ASCE. ( 2000). Code of ethics, ASCE, Reston, Va.
8.
ASCE. ( 2000). “Vision, mission and goals for revising the ASCE strategic plan.” ASCE, Reston, Va.
9.
Andrews, R. N. L. ( 1998). “Environmental regulation and business `self-regulation.”' Policy Sci., 31, 177–197.
10.
Bosso, C. J. ( 2000). “Environmental groups and the new political landscape.” Envir. Policy, N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft, eds., Congressional Quarterly; Washington, D.C., 55–76.
11.
Brunner, R. D. ( 1991). “The policy movement as a policy problem.” Policy Sci., 24(1), 65–98.
12.
Carnegie Commission. ( 1993). Rep. of the Carnegie Commission on Sci., Technol. and Gov., New York.
13.
Chilton, K. W. ( 2000). “How changes in the regulatory climate provide threats and opportunities to environmental professionals.” Envir. Engr., (Jan.), 36(1), 24–32.
14.
Churchman, C. W. ( 1968). The systems approach, Dell, New York.
15.
Clinton, W. J. ( 1995). “Remarks by the President on Project XI.” Ofc. of the Press Secretary, The White House, Washington, D.C.
16.
Davies, J. Cl., and Mazurek, J. ( 1998). Pollution control in the United States, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 269–289.
17.
Delaney, B. T., and Schiffman, R. I. ( 1997). “Organizational issues associated with the implementation of ISO 14000.” Envir. Engr., (Jan.), 33(1), 9–11.
18.
Enterprise for the Environment. ( 1998). E4E: The environmental protection system in transition: Toward a more desirable future. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, D.C.
19.
EPA. ( 1996). “Common sense strategies to protect public health: A progress report on reinventing environmental regulation,” Washington, D.C.
20.
EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. ( 1992). National air quality and emission trends report, Washington, D.C.
21.
EPA Office of the Administrator. ( 1994). The new generation of environmental protection, Washington, D.C.
22.
EPA Office of Water. ( 1992). National water quality inventory report to Congress, Washington, D.C.
23.
EPA Science Advisory Board. ( 1990). Reducing risk, Washington, D.C.
24.
Freeman, A. M. ( 1999). “Economics, incentives and environmental regulations,” Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century, 4th Ed., N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft, eds., CQ Press, 190–209.
25.
Godish, T. ( 1997). Air quality, CRC, Washington, D.C.
26.
Graham, J. D. ( 1990). Harnessing science for environmental regulation, Praeger, Westport, Conn.
27.
Graham, J. D., and Wiener, J. B. ( 1995). Risk vs. risk: Tradeoffs in protecting health and the environment, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
28.
Hampton, D. ( 2000). “Hard decisions require the right choices.” ASCE News, 25(6), 6.
29.
Hausker, K. ( 1999). “The convergence of ideas on improving the environmental protection system.” Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, D.C.
30.
Ingram, H. M., Colnic, D. H., and Mann, D. E. ( 1995). “Interest groups and environmental policy.” Environmental politics and policy: Theories and evidence, 2nd Ed., J. P. Lester, ed., Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 115–135.
31.
Kettl, D. F. ( 2000). “Public administration at the millennium: The state of the field.” J. Public Admin. Res. and Theory, 10(1), 7–34.
32.
Kneese, A. V., and Bower, B. T. ( 1968). “Managing water quality: Economics, technology and institutions.” Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 3–10.
33.
Kris, M. ( 1996). “Not-so-silent spring.” Nat. J., March 9, 522–526.
34.
Laswell, H. ( 1971). A pre-view of policy sciences, Elsevier, New York.
35.
Loehr, R. C. ( 1999). “Changing times for environmental management.” Envir. Engr., (Oct.), U.K., 35(4), 15–38.
36.
Montgomery County Council. ( 1975). Montgomery County ten year solid waste management plan, 1975–84, Rockville, Md.
37.
National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). ( 1995). “Setting priorities, getting results: A new direction for EPA.” Washington, D.C.
38.
National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). ( 1997). “Resolving the paradox of environmental protection: An agenda for Congress, EPA and the states.” Washington, D.C.
39.
National Environmental Policy Institute (NEPI). ( 1997). “Environmental goals and priorities: Four building blocks for change.” Washington, D.C.
40.
Petroski, H. ( 1985). To engineer is human, St. Martin, New York.
41.
Press, D., and Mazmanian, D. A. ( 1999). “Understanding the transition to a sustainable economy.” Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century, N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft, eds., CQ Press, Washington, D.C., 269–277.
42.
Roper Starch Worldwide. ( 1997). The national report card on environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, National Environmental Education and Training Foundation, Washington, D.C.
43.
Rosenbaum, W. ( 1998). Environmental politics and policy, 4th Ed., CQ Press, Washington, D.C.
44.
Schon, D. A. ( 1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
45.
Schroeder, C. H. ( 2000). “Third way environmentalism.” Kansas Law Review, 48, 1–48.
46.
Sparrow, M. K. ( 1994). Imposing duties, Praeger, Westport, Conn.
47.
Stahl, M. ( 1995). “Enforcement in transition.” The environmental forum, November/December, 19–24.
48.
Stavins, R. N., and Whitehead, B. W. ( 1992). “Dealing with pollution.” Envir., 34(7), 7–41.
49.
Tobin, R. J. ( 1999). “Environment, population and the developing world.” Environmental Policy: New directions for the twenty-first century, 4th Ed., N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft, eds., CQ Press, Washington, D.C., 345–346.
50.
U.S. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). ( 1992). Environmental quality: 23rd annual report of CEQ, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
51.
Wiener, J. B. ( 2000). “From sustainable development to sustainable governance.” Sustainability, moral principles and 21st Century environmental policy, J. M. Gillroy, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
52.
World Commission on Environment and Development. ( 1987). Our common future, Oxford, U.K.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 127Issue 3July 2001
Pages: 130 - 138

History

Received: Feb 7, 2001
Published online: Jul 1, 2001
Published in print: Jul 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

P.E., Member, ASCE
Sr. Advisor, Ofc. of the Chief Financial Officer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (MD-35), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share