Statute of Limitations for Civil Engineering Liability
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 122, Issue 2
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the statutes of limitations as applied to design professional (civil engineer) negligence. There are two main statutes of limitations that affect design professionals. The first statute of limitations is based on the date of completion of work. For latent property defects, the statute of limitations in California is 10 years after completion of the design professional's work on the project. There can be exceptions to the statutes of limitations, which would suspend (or “toll”) the running of the time period. Examples include willful misconduct, reckless misconduct, and/or fraudulent concealment. The second statute of limitations is based on accrual (i.e., the date of damage discovery). For property damage, a lawsuit must be filed within two years after the damage is first discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. The statutes of limitations are important because they specify the period of time during which a civil engineer may be sued. A lawsuit will be time-barred by whichever period of limitation lapses first. Tort reform is a high priority in the United States. Civil engineers and their associations should actively seek to develop national standards, which limit exceptions to the statutes of limitations and define reasonable periods of time during which the civil engineer will be legally liable for his or her work on the project.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Day, R. W.(1992). “Depositions and trial testimony, a positive experience?”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 118(2), 129–131.
2.
Day, R. W.(1993a). “Geotechnical engineering, a risky profession with many issures and problems.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 119(2), 201–204.
3.
Day, R. W.(1993b). “Strict liability in civil engineering practice.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 119(2), 134–137.
4.
Day, R. W.(1993c). “Certificate of merit in civil litigation.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 119(3), 279–283.
5.
Day, R. W.(1994a). “Standard of care in civil litigation.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 120(2), 145–148.
6.
Day, R. W.(1994b). “Strategies for avoiding civil liability.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 120(3), 265–269.
7.
Day, R. W.(1994c). “Engineering jargon and civil liability.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 120(4), 413–418.
8.
Day, R. W.(1995). “Written document and civil litigation.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 121(1), 22–24.
9.
“Recommended practices for design professionals engaged as experts in the resolution of construction industry disputes.” (1991). Pamphlet .
10.
Sweet, J. (1970). Legal aspects of architecture, engineering and the construction process . West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minn.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1996
Published in print: Apr 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.