Should Conversion to SI System Continue to Be Debated?
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 122, Issue 2
Abstract
Ninety five percent of the world's population uses the international system of units—Système International (SI). However, we continue to debate converting to the international system of units in the United States. In this paper, a comprehensive list is presented of the advantages of the SI system. We then give the reasons why we need to convert to the SI system of units. A few major corporations in the United States have already made the changeover to the SI system, but the general population is still reluctant to make the change from U.S. customary units. Studying these conflicting issues simultaneously is important in the implementation of the SI system, if enforced in our country. We have also enumerated the ways we can progress toward the changeover. These ways include learning from the experiences of our own failed effort of the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 and study how other countries made the successful changeover in recent decades.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chapman, M. (1994). “Metrics: mismeasuring consumer demand.”Consumers Res., (Feb.), 24.
2.
Dalphin, R. J.(1993). “Faculty attitudes about progress of metrication.”J. Prof. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., 119, 182–200.
3.
Davis, H. L. (1979). “Opportunity for public services.”Physics Today, (Feb.), 104.
4.
Ferrel, T. (1979). “The meter haters begin rally.”New York Times, May 13, E22.
5.
Fong, D. (1989). “Make mine metric.”Forbes, (June), 106–107.
6.
Garfinkel, S. L. (1989). “America moves to metric measures.”Christian Science Monitor, Feb. 20, 12.
7.
Gautschi, T. F. (1994). “Is the inch-pound system a self-imposed barrier?”Design News, (Apr.), 142.
8.
“Get in step, Uncle Sam.” (1977). New York Times, 27 June, p. 27.
9.
Guillen, M. A. (1977). “U.S. metric conversion: rough road ahead.”Sci. News, July 16, 42.
10.
Heilbron, J. L.(1989). “The politics of the meter stick.”Am. J. Physics, 57, 988–992.
11.
Jakuba, S. R. (1988). “Go metric? Now?”ChemTech, (July), 424.
12.
Last, A. M.(1988). “The metric system: its history and development as portrayed on postage stamps.”School Sci. and Math., 88, 581–592.
13.
Leslie, S. (1979). “The metrics debate.”New York Times, Jan. 10, C9.
14.
Ligon, H. (1992). “Metric mania.”The Sci. Teacher, (Oct.), 33–35.
15.
Lustig, H. (1979). “More on metrics.”New York Times, Jan. 10, C12.
16.
Malcolm, A. H. (1980). “The metric confusion in Canada.”New York Times, Feb. 19, D1, 5.
17.
Michell, J. (1983). “How Britons reacted to a metric initiative.”New York Times, May 7, 22.
18.
“No more light years.” (1994). Sky and Telescope, (Mar.), 15.
19.
Russakoff, D. (1990). “When metric meets immovable object.”Washington Post, May 3, A23.
20.
Underwood, G. T. (1989). “Metric—why now.”Automotive Engrg., (Oct.), 79–80.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 122 • Issue 2 • April 1996
Pages: 69 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1996
Published in print: Apr 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.