History of Technology Policy—Commercial Nuclear Power
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 121, Issue 2
Abstract
The present paper describes the rise and fall of nuclear power as a case history of a U.S. technology policy. The case history is relevant to the recent revival of discussions on national technology policies. Such policies, sometimes called industrial policies, bestow incentives and protection on a nation's favored industries in order to improve their international competitive positions. Economists cite the industrial policies of Japan and Korea as one of the reasons for the strong international competitiveness of their automotive and electronics industries. The history of U.S. commercial nuclear power provides a case study on the extent to which U.S. government policies have been able to steer technological development to support national and international objectives. U.S. utilities ordered 218 nuclear power plants after President Eisenhower implemented his “Atoms for Peace” policy starting in 1953. They canceled 102 of them after 1975 when President Carter reversed the policy in order to set a nuclear nonproliferation example for the rest of the world, The canceled plants cost shareholders and ratepayers approximently $74 billion.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alexander, T. (1976). “ERDA's job is to throw money at the energy crisis.”Fortune, v(n), 152–162.
2.
Atomic Industrial Forum. (1986). “Standardization of nuclear power plants in the U.S.: a report by the study group on the practical application of standardized nuclear power plants in the United States. Rep., Washington, D.C., p. 4.
3.
Burn, D. (1978). Nuclear power and the energy crisis . University Press, New York, N.Y., 64–68.
4.
“Calder Hall report.” (1956). Nucleonics, 14(12), 52.
5.
“Carter leaves his nuclear policy hazy—provides time to maneuver.” (1977). Nucleonics Week, special issue, 1–3.
6.
Cole, W. S.(1955). “The meaning of the new atomic law—1.”Nucleonics, 13(1), 12.
7.
Dale, A. G. (1979). Nuclear power development in the United States to 1960, Arno Press, New York, N.Y., 94–95.
8.
Fairweather, V.(1985). “The pursuit of quality: QA/QC.”Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 55(2), 62–64.
9.
Foreman, H. (1972). Nuclear power and the public . Doubleday & Company, Inc., New York, N.Y., p. xiv.
10.
Glennan, T. K.(1951). “Industry . . . the atom and nuclear power.”Nucleonics, 10(1), 16.
11.
“Historical Profile of U.S. Nuclear Power Development.” (1992). Energy Data, U.S. Council for Energy Awareness (USCEA), 1–16.
12.
Hogerton, J. F.(1968). “The arrival of nuclear power.”Scientific Am., 218(2), 23.
13.
Kenton, J. E.(1978). “The birth and early history of nuclear power.”EPRI J., 3(5), 9.
14.
“Late news and commentary, AEC advise.” (1954). Nucleonics, 12(10), 10.
15.
“New studies predict lower risk at U.S. and German reactors.” (1988). Inside NRC, 10(21), 1.
16.
“Nuclear industry takes Ford's message as a breath of fresh air.” (1975). Nucleonics Week, 16(4), 1.
17.
“Oversight hearing on quality assurance in nuclear power plant construction.” (1981). 97th Congress, 1st Session, Serial No. 97-26, House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C., November 19, 4–42.
18.
“Prudence issues affecting the U.S. electric utility industry.” (1987). Rep. Prepared for Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/Sub/86-56559-1, United Engineers & Constructors, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., 82–126.
19.
“Simon says: `200,000 Mwe by 1980'; industry says: `what?”' (1974). Nucleonics Week, 15(7), 1.
20.
Smyth, H. D. (1945). Atomic energy for military purposes, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., p. 24.
21.
“3.42-mill power and a 1 GWe plant.” (1964). Nuclear News, 7(3), 32.
22.
U.S. Department of Energy. (1982). “U.S. commercial nuclear power: historical perspective, current status and outlook.”Rep. No. DOE/EIA-0315, Energy Information Office, Washington, D.C., p. 5.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 121 • Issue 2 • April 1995
Pages: 85 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1995
Published in print: Apr 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.