Teaching Engineering to Increase Motivation
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 120, Issue 1
Abstract
Mathematics and physics receive the greatest attention during the early years of the engineering curriculum. This, unfortunately, does not breed the confidence necessary for engineering students to solve real‐world problems, and can lead to a gradual erosion of the motivation necessary to complete the engineering degree. Motivation in students can be increased by introducing design in the formative stages of the engineering program. Selected design problems should have an unstructured component that compels the students to search for information and obtain an increased awareness of the relationship of engineering to other fields of knowledge. Design problems should be closely linked to laboratory experiments that have been carefully chosen to give students a balanced perception of the significance and meaning of the simplifications inherent in mathematical treatments of engineering systems. Students capable of grasping a broad picture of engineering (in the context of working on laboratory projects) accrue many important benefits. These include an appreciation of the nature and limitations of engineering as well as an increased knowledge of how to think as an engineer. The by‐products of this are burgeoning confidence and continued motivation to develop the skills to be a good engineer.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cassidy, J. J., Baldwin, J. W., and Pauw, A. (1970). “Realistic civil engineering design.” Engrg. Educ., 61(10), 130–131.
2.
de Halherbe, M. C. (1963). Discussion of “On the teaching of design in universities” by R. E. D. Bishop. Proc., Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 177(27), 727–728.
3.
Field, B. W., Hutchinson, G. L., and Morgan, P. R. (1989). “Cope with or master—An example from structural engineering education.” World Conf. on Engrg. Educ. for Advancing Tech., Institution of Engineers, Australia, 810–812.
4.
Gregory, M. S. (1965). “Teaching engineering attitude to students.” J. Profl. Practice, ASCE, 91(1), 1–21.
5.
Kemper, J. D. (1990). Engineers and their profession. 4th Ed., Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, Pa.
6.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). “Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change.” Sci. Educ., 66(2), 211–227.
7.
Stevens, L. K., Schmidt, L. C., Base, G. D., Mansell, D. S., and Morgan, P. R. (1972). “Experiments in the teaching of structural design.” Inst. Engrs. Aust. Civ. Engrg. Trans., CE14(1), 110–114.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 12, 1992
Published online: Jan 1, 1994
Published in print: Jan 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.