Why Four Years?
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 117, Issue 2
Abstract
The traditional four‐year undergraduate program in civil engineering is constantly under pressure from the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), industry, and educators themselves. The idea of a five‐year program is hardly a new one. There are many current factors that point to an increasing pressure to lengthen the current program. At the same time, student preparation and financial burdens have been factors in adding to the average time required to complete an undergraduate degree. This paper deals with the current climate and proposes an idea whose time has come again: a five‐year program leading directly to a master's degree. Those institutions that offered five‐year bach‐elor‐of‐science programs, as recently as the early 1960s, eventually found it difficult to compete for students. The professional program, leading directly to a master's degree, has also been attempted and usually was abandoned. The proposed program is a compromise that tries to address the concerns of everyone associated with civil engineering education.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Civil engineering education. (1960). The Cooper Union/ASCE/ASEE, New York, N.Y.
2.
Pletta, D. H. (1974). “Ut Prosimus et Ducamus.” Proc. Civ. Engrg. Education Conf., ASCE, 1, 459–467.
3.
“Report on the Task Committee on Professional Education.” (1958). Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 28, Feb., 111.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1991
Published in print: Apr 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.