Demoresearch for Resource and Energy Recovery
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Volume 111, Issue 1
Abstract
The concept of mechanical separation of municipal solid waste (MSW) was initially viewed with great optimism, prompting the use of unit operations taken from other industries without adequate modification. Many plants were built that could not perform adequately. As a result of these experiences, there is very little current interest in resource recovery in general and waste‐to‐energy production in particular by municipalities. The reasons for the lack of success of the resource recovery industry are largely attributable to non‐technical policy issues and organizational constraints. Research is needed to perform the significant development of the unit operations required for their implementation in resource recovery. The experience of the authors in resource recovery research is that such research is very likely to be fruitful. The ability of research to produce devices capable of separating a variety of MSW streams and producing a variety of products must, however, be demonstrated to a wide audience. To solve such problems, the concept of a research‐oriented demonstration facility is suggested. Such demoresearch projects, funded by the federal government, are suggested to be essential to the success of resource recovery.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baer, W. S., Johnson, L. L., and Merrow, E. W., Analysis of Federally Funded Demonstration Projects: Final Report, The Rand Corp., Santa Monica, Calif., Apr., 1976.
2.
Gullett, B., Measurement of Energy in Refuse‐Derived Fuel, Duke Environmental Center, Durham, N.C., 1981.
3.
Harrison, B., and Vesilind, P. A., High Technology: A Failure Analysis, Vol. 2 of Design and Management for Resource Recovery, Ann Arbor Science Pub., Ann Arbor, Mich., 1980.
4.
Holloman, J. H., “Policies and Programs of Governments Directed Toward Industrial Innovation,” in Christospher T. Hill and James M. Utterback, eds., Technical Innovation for a Dynamic Economy, Pergamon Press, New York, N.Y., July, 1976.
5.
Horowitz, P., “Direct Government Funding of Research and Development: Intended and Unintended Effects on Industrial Innovation,” in: Christospher T. Hill and James M. Utterback, ed., Technical Innovation for a Dynamic Economy, Pergamon Press, New York, N.Y., July 1979.
6.
Magat, W. A., “The Proper Role of Government in the American Economy,” Duke Univ., Durham, N.C., 1978.
7.
Resource Planning Associates, A Study of Federal Subsidies to Stimulate Resource Recovery, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 1974.
8.
Shapley, W. H., Research and Development in the Federal Budget: FY 1977, American Association for the Advance of Science, Washington, D.C., 1976.
9.
U.S. Office of Technology Assessment, The Role of Demonstrations in Federal R&D Policy, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., July 1978.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Volume 111 • Issue 1 • January 1985
Pages: 22 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1985
Published in print: Jan 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.