Full-Scale Field Testing for Verification of Mechanical Properties of Polyurethane Foams for Use as Backfill in PCC Repairs
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 3
Abstract
Laboratory and field investigations were performed on several commercially available rigid polyurethane foam materials to determine their suitability as base replacement materials for full-depth portland concrete cement (PCC) pavement repairs. Rigid polyurethane foam (RPF) specimens were prepared and tested to evaluate the compressive strength, reactivity, and density of several foam materials under a variety of temperature conditions, where properties were investigated for thermal variations expected in field placement. Following laboratory testing, full-scale field testing of full-depth PCC repairs was conducted using two RPFs of densities of approximately and to verify laboratory predicted performance under elevated and ideal field temperatures. Each repair was trafficked within 3 h of repair completion with an F-15E load cart to simulate fighter aircraft traffic on early-age repairs. Results of laboratory and field testing indicate that high-density RPF materials are suitable as base replacement materials for temporary pavement repairs on airfields. For optimum field performance a RPF with minimum density of should be placed at a temperature of .
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The tests described and the resulting data presented herein, unless otherwise noted, were obtained from research conducted under the Airfield Damage Repair (ADR) Civil Engineer Modernization program currently sponsored by Headquarters, Air Combat Command by the U.S. Army Engineering Research and Development Center, Waterways Experiment Station. Permission was granted by the laboratory director to publish this information. The Headquarters, Department of the Army, sponsored the research reported herein. The support of the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Waterways Experiment Station, is gratefully acknowledged. The U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center does not endorse any of the materials reported herein.
References
ASTM. (1994). “Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading).” C 78, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2000). “Standard test method for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils.” D 4318, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2002). “Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort.” D 1557, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2004). “Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics.” D 1621-04a, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2005a). “Standard test methods for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C 39, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2005b). “Standard test method for flexible cellular materials-slab, bonded, and molded urethane foams.” D 3574, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2006). “Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes.” D 2487, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Gibson, L. G., and Ashby, M. F. (1997). Cellular solids, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Gong, L., and Kyriakides, S. (2005). “Compressive response of open-cell foams, part II: Initiation and evolution of crushing.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 42(5–6), 1381–1399.
Gong, L., Kyriakides, S., and Jang, W. Y. (2005). “Compressive response of open-cell foams, part I: Morphology and elastic properties.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 42(5–6), 1355–1379.
Jin, H., Lu, W. Y., Scheffel, S., Hinnerichs, T. D., and Neilsen, M. K. (2007). “Full-field characterization of mechanical behavior of polyurethane foams.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 44(21), 6930–6944.
Masi, P., Nicolais, L., Mazzola, M., and Narkis, M. (1984). “Tensile behavior of high-density thermosetting polyester foams.” Polym. Eng. Sci., 24(7), 469–472.
Priddy, L. P., and Hodo, W. (2009). “Constitutive analysis of polyurethane foam composite mixtures: A literature review.” Special Rep. No. GSL-09-03, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss.
Priddy, L. P., Tingle, J. S., and McCaffrey, T. J. (2007). “Laboratory and field evaluations of small crater repair materials.” Technical Rep. No. GSL-07-27, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss.
Soltesz, S. (2002). “Injected polyurethane slab jacking.” Final Rep. No. SPF 306-261, Oregon DOT, Salem, Ore.
Subhash, G., Liu, Q., and Gao, X. L. (2006). “Quasistatic and high strain rate uniaxial compressive response of polymeric structural foams.” Int. J. Impact Eng., 32(7), 1113–1126.
Woodfin, R. L. (1997). “Rigid polyurethane foam (RPF) technology for countermine (sea) program-phase 1.” Technical Rep. No. SAND96-2841, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, N.M.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 18, 2008
Accepted: Oct 9, 2009
Published online: Feb 12, 2010
Published in print: Mar 2010
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Carl Liu
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.