Quantitative Interpretation of Half-Cell Potential Measurements in Concrete Structures
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 9
Abstract
The interpretation of half-cell potential measurements in reinforced concrete structures can be a major challenge for civil engineers. The main reason for this is that half-cell potential mapping provides information to predict the probability of corrosion in concrete, but it does not give clear insight on the rate and the nature of corrosion. Although for general uniform corrosion, half-cell data can provide valuable information about the probability of corrosion. In the case of localized corrosion, the predictions of half-cell measurements can be misleading. The main objective of the present work is to provide practicing engineers a tool that they can use to better interpret the results of half-cell potential measurements. This tool quantitatively relates the potential readings on the surface of the concrete to the rate of probable localized reinforcement corrosion through concrete resistivity, cover thickness, and temperature, allowing the engineers to gain supplementary information from half-cell tests. Experimental comparisons presented in this paper demonstrate the potential benefits of the proposed approach when typical half-cell measurements may not be able to predict the localized corrosion mechanism.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, which is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Alonso, C., Andrade, C., and Gonzalez, J. A. (1988). “Relation between resistivity and corrosion rate of reinforcements in carbonated mortar made with several cement types.” Cem. Concr. Res., 18(5), 687–698.
Andrade, C., and Gonzalez, J. A. (1978). “Quantitative measurements of corrosion rate of reinforcing steels embedded in concrete using polarization measurements.” Werkst. Korros., 29(8), 515–519.
ASTM. (1999). “Standard test method for half-cell potentials of uncoated reinforcing steel in concrete.” ASTM C 876-91, ASTM, Philadelphia.
Balabanic, G., Bicanic, N., and Durekovic, A. (1995). “Numerical analysis of corrosion cell in concrete.” Int. J. Eng. Modell., 8(1–2), 1–5.
Berkeley, K. G. C., and Pathmanaban, S. (1990). Cathodic protection of reinforcement steel in concrete, Butterworth-Heinemann, London.
Bertolini, L., Elsener, B., Pedeferri, P., and Polder, R. (2004). Corrosion of steel in concrete, Wiley, Weinheim, Germany.
Bohni, H. (2005). Corrosion in reinforced concrete structures, CRC, New York.
Elsener, B. (2002). “Macrocell corrosion of steel in concrete—Implications for corrosion monitoring.” Cem. Concr. Compos., 24(1), 65–72.
Elsener, B., Andrade, C., Gulikers, J., Polder, R., and Raupach, M. (2003). “Half-cell potential measurements—Potential mapping on reinforced concrete structures.” Mater. Struct., 36(7), 461–471.
Ge, J., and Isgor, O. B. (2006). “On the numerical solution of laplace's equation with nonlinear boundary conditions for corrosion of steel in concrete.” Proc., ISCCBE Conf. (CD-ROM), Wiley InterScience, Montreal.
Ghods, P., Isgor, O. B., and Pour-Ghaz, M. (2007). “A practical method for calculating the corrosion rate of uniformly depassivated reinforcing bars in concrete.” Mater. Corros., 58(4), 265–272.
GjØrv, O. E., Vennesland, Ø., and El-Busiady, A. H. S. (1977). “Electrical resistivity of concrete in the oceans.” Proc., 9th Annual Offshore Technology Conf., Houston, 581–588.
Gowers, K. R., Millard, S. G., Gill, J. S., and Gill, R. P. (1994). “Programmable linear polarization meter for determination of corrosion rate of reinforcement in concrete structures.” Br. Corros. J., London, 29(1), 25–32.
Gulikers, J. (2005). “Theoretical considerations on the supposed linear relationship between concrete resistivity and corrosion rate of steel reinforcement.” Mater. Corros., 56(6), 393–403.
Isgor, O. B., and Razaqpur, A. G. (2004). “Finite element modeling of coupled heat transfer, moisture transport and carbonation processes in concrete structures.” Cem. Concr. Compos., 26(1), 57–73.
Kranc, S. C., and Sagues, A. A. (1994). “Computation of reinforcing steel corrosion distribution in concrete marine bridge substructures.” Corrosion (Houston), 50(1), 50–61.
Luping, T. (2002). “Calibration of the electrochemical methods for the corrosion rate measurement of steel in concrete.” Rep. No. 2002:25, SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, ⟨http://www.nordicinnovation.net/nordtestfiler/tec531.pdf⟩.
Munn, R. S., and Devereux, O. F. (1991). “Numerical modeling and solution of galvanic corrosion systems. Part I: Governing differential equation and electrodic boundary conditions.” Corrosion (Houston), 47(8), 612–618.
Redaelli, E., Bertolini, L., Peelen, W., and Polder, R. (2006). “FEM-models for the propagation period of chloride induced reinforcement corrosion.” Mater. Corros., 57(8), 628–635.
Sagues, A. A., and Kranc, S. C. (1992). “On the determination of polarization diagrams of reinforcing steel in concrete.” Corrosion (Houston), 48(8), 624–633.
Uhlig, H. H., and Revie, R. W. (1985). Corrosion and corrosion control, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Warkus, J., Brem, M., and Raupach, M. (2006). “BEM-models for the propagation period of chloride induced reinforcement corrosion.” Mater. Corros., 57(8), 636–641.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 18, 2007
Accepted: Mar 26, 2009
Published online: Aug 14, 2009
Published in print: Sep 2009
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Zhishen Wu
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.