TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 15, 2004

Gradation Control of Bottom Ash Aggregate in Superpave Bituminous Mixes

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 16, Issue 6

Abstract

Dwindling sources of traditional aggregates, ever increasing haulage distance, and diminishing landfills are the primary factors that favor the reuse of construction-quality waste materials in highway pavements. Although numerous studies have been conducted on the performance of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash (MSWI-BA) in cement concrete, little is known about its characteristics in bituminous concrete pavements, especially in Superpave design hot mix asphalt (HMA). By comparing the air voids and voids filled with asphalt of 20% MSWI-BA HMA samples aged for 2 and 4h for a trial mix, all the blends prepared for this research were aged for 4h prior to compaction. Varying the slope/curvature, and the proportions of stone sand and stone dust in trial mixes showed that slope/curvature is more significant than aggregate type in increasing voids in mineral aggregates (VMA). The design binder contents in mixes were found to increase from 6.2% for 0% BA content to 7.4% for 20% BA, a difference of 1.2% (a 19% increase). Also, as bottom ash content is increased to 20%, the effective asphalt decreases from 5.1 to 4.4%, while the absorbed asphalt increases from 1.3 to 3.2%. These findings are consistent with the high absorptivities (i.e., 9.2% water) found for the bottom ash and its high internal porosity resulting in total surface area increase of aggregate structures containing MSWI-BA. Although the 13.0% minimum VMA specified by Superpave was met for all MSWI-BA contents of the design mix used for this study, a marked decrease from 15.3% VMA for 0% BA to 13.4% VMA for 20% BA was measured. Results of the %Gmm at Ninitial for 0–20% MSWI-BA HMA are essentially the same, falling between 85 and 86% compaction. Based solely on the results of the Superpave densification values (%Gmm at Ninitital and Nmax) for this study, substitution of up to 20% MSWI-BA for virgin aggregates yield mixes having aggregates structures that are well developed to resist compaction, rutting, and tenderness in agreement with the findings of Wang et al. in 2000. Obviously, rutting potential, fatigue characteristics, resilient modulus, and field studies should be evaluated to thoroughly investigate the performance of MSWI-BA amended HMA.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

16.
AASHTO MP1. (2001). “Specification for performance graded asphalt binder.” AASHTO Provisional Standards, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
17.
AASHTO T11. (1998). “Materials finer than 75 μm (No. 200) sieve in mineral aggregates by washing.” AASHTO Standard Method of Testing, 19th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
18.
AASHTO T27. (1998). “Seive Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates.” AASHTO Standard Method of Testing, 19th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
19.
AASHTO T96. (1998). “Resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine.” AASHTO Standard Method of Testing, 19th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
20.
AASHTO T104. (1998). “Soundness of aggregates by use of sodium sulfate or magnesium sulfate.” AASHTO Standard Method of Testing, 19th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
21.
AASHTO T112. (1998). “Clay lumps and friable particles in aggregate.” AASHTO Standard Method of Testing, 19th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
23.
AASHTO T176. (1998). “Plastic fines in graded aggregates and soils by use of the sand equivalent test.” AASHTO Standard Method of Testing, 19th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
24.
AASHTO T304. (1998). “Uncompacted void content of fine aggregate.” AASHTO Standard Method of Testing, 19th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
1.
Atkins, H.N., (1983). Highway materials, soils, and concretes, Prentice-Hall, Reston, Va.
25.
ASTM D5821. (2000). “Standard test method for determining the percentage of fractured particles in coarse aggregate.” American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
26.
ASTM D4791. (2000). “Standard test method for flat particles, elongated particles or flat and elongated particles in coarse aggregate.” American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.
2.
Berg, E. R., and Neal, J. A., (1998). “Municipal solid waste bottom ash as Portland cement concrete ingredient.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10(3), 168–173.
3.
Churchill, E. V., and Amirkhanian, S. N., (1999). “Coal ash utilization in asphalt concrete mixtures.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 11(4), 295–301.
4.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1999). “Superpave asphalt mixture design.” Workshop workbook, v6.2, U.S. DOT.
5.
Jones, S. D., Mahboub, K. C., Anderson, R. M., and Bahia, H. U., (1998). “Applicability of Superpave to modified asphalts: A mixture study.” Transportation Research Record 1630, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 42–50.
6.
Kandhal, P. S., Foo, K. Y., and Mallick, R. B., (1998). “Critical review of voids in mineral aggregate requirements in Superpave.” Transportation Research Record 1609, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 21–27.
7.
Mallick, R. B., Buchanan, S., Brown, R. E., and Huner, M., (1998). “Evaluation of Superpave gyratory compaction of hot mix asphalt.” Transportation Research Record 1638, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 111–119.
8.
Meegoda, N.J., Huang, D.-R., DuBose, B.H., Chen, Y., Mueller, R.T., and Vaccari, D.A., (1992). “Use of petroleum contaminated soils in asphalt concrete.” Hydorcarbon contaminated soils, Vol. II, P. T. Kostecki, E. J. Calabrese, and M. Bonazountas, eds., Lewis, Chelsea, Mich., 529–548.
9.
Oduroh, P. K., Mahboub, K. C., and Anderson, R. M., (2000). “Flat and elongated aggregates in Superpave regime.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 12(2), 124–130.
11.
Sousa, J. B., Pais, J. C., Prates, M., Barros, R., Langlois, P., and Leclerc, A-M., (1998). “Effect aggregate gradation on fatigue life of Asphalt concrete mixes.” Transportation Research Record 1630, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 62–68.
12.
Taha, R., Ali, G., and Delwar, M., (1998). “Evaluation of coke dust-modified asphalt using Superpave.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 10(3), 174–179.
13.
The Asphalt Institute. (1989). The asphalt handbook, Lexington, Ky.
14.
Vavrik, W. R., and Carpenter, S. H., (1998). “Calculating air voids at specified number of gyrations in Superpave gyratory compactor.” Transportation Research Record 1630, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 117–125.
15.
Wang, J-N., Kennedy, T. W., and McGennis, R. B., (2000). “Volumetric and mechanical performance properties of Superpave mixtures.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 12(3), 238–244.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 16Issue 6December 2004
Pages: 604 - 613

History

Published online: Nov 15, 2004
Published in print: Dec 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

V. O. Ogunro
Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Dept. and Faculty Fellow, Global Institute for Energy and Environmental Systems (GIEES), The Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
H. I. Inyang
Duke Energy Distinguished Professor, Global Institute for Energy and Environmental Systems (GIEES), and Civil Engineering Dept., The Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223.
F Hooper
Project Manager, GeoTesting Express, Inc., Materials Technology Center, 1145 Massachusetts Ave., Boxborough, MA 01719.
D. Young
Professor, Civil Engineering Dept., The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28223.
A. Oturkar
Staff Engineer, Weston and Sampson Engineers, Inc., 5 Centennial Dr., Peaboby, MA 01960.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share