Relationship between the Representative Volume Element and Mechanical Properties of Asphalt Concrete
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 13, Issue 1
Abstract
The size of an asphalt concrete test specimen has been traditionally determined based on experience and practical purposes. This study discusses theoretical considerations for selecting the minimum dimensions so that the resulting size of the specimen represents global material properties. The ideal size of the specimen was determined using an image analysis approach and was verified with mechanical tests. The image analysis was accomplished by studying the internal structure of asphalt concrete. The internal structure was captured using a nondestructive X-ray computer tomography technique. Mechanical testing was accomplished by using the Superpave Shear Tester on laboratory-prepared samples. The laboratory samples had dimensions that were both smaller and larger than the theoretically determined representative size. Statistical analysis indicates that the variability of the results is a function of the loading mechanism used in the Superpave Shear Tester. In general, the required representative size increased considerably when the nominal aggregate size was larger than 25.0 mm.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ( 1995). “Provisional standards.” Washington, D.C.
2.
Anderson, R. M., Cominsky, R., and Killingsworth, B. ( 1998). “Sensitivity of Superpave mixture tests to changes in mixture components.” J. Assn. of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 67, 153–187.
3.
Bachmat, Y., and Bear, J. ( 1985). “On the concept and size of a representative elementary volume (REV).” Advances in transport phenomena in porous media, J. Bear and M. Y. Corapcioglu, eds., 5–20.
4.
Bonaquist, R. F. ( 1992). “Pavement testing facility—Phase I final report.” Rep. FHWA-RD-92-121, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va.
5.
Cominsky, R. J., Huber, G. A., Kennedy, T. M., and Anderson, M. ( 1994). “The Superpave mix design manual for new construction and overlays.” Rep. SHRP-A-407, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
6.
Debye, P., Anderson, H. R., and Brumberger, H. ( 1957). “Scattering by an inhomogeneous solid. II. The correlation function and its application.” J. Appl. Phys., 28, 679–683.
7.
Harvey, J., Sousa, J., and Crockford, W. ( 1995). “Performance prediction for large-stone mixes using the repetitive simple shear test at constant height.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1492, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 46–52.
8.
Hashin, Z. ( 1983). “Analysis of composite materials. A survey.” J. Appl. Mech., 50, 481–505.
9.
ImageTool: Image analysis program. (1997). Department of Dental Diagnostic Science, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.
10.
Masad, E., Muhunthan, B., Shashidhar, N., and Harman, T. (1999a). “Internal structure characterization of asphalt concrete using image analysis.”J. Comp. in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 13(2), 88–95.
11.
Masad, E. A., Muhunthan, B., Shashidhar, N., and Harman, T. ( 1999b). “Effect of compaction procedure on the aggregate structure in asphalt concrete.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1681, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 179–184.
12.
May, R. W., and Killingsworth, B. ( 1995). “Superpave performance predictions—A first look at utility, sensitivity, and repeatability.” J. Assn. of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 64, 669–717.
13.
McGennis, R. B., Anderson, M., Kennedy, T. M., and Solaimanian, M. ( 1995). “Background of Superpave asphalt mixture design and analysis.” Rep. FHWA-SA-95-003, Federal Highway Administration, Arlington, Va.
14.
Montgomery, D. C. ( 1991). Design and analysis of experiments, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
15.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., and Kutner, M. H. ( 1985). Applied linear statistical models, 2nd Ed., Irwin, Ill.
16.
Pellinen, T., and Christensen, D. W. ( 1997). “Repeatability and accuracy of tests performed using two Superpave shear devices.” Mechanical tests for bituminous materials, Proc., 5th Int. RILEM Symp., Essen, Germany.
17.
Pellinen, T., and Killingsworth, B. ( 1996). “ALF pavement core testing: Permanent deformation predictions using superpave software.” Rep. Prepared for Fed. Hwy. Admin., HNR-20, McLean, Va.
18.
Quiblier, J. A. ( 1984). “A new three-dimensional modeling technique for studying porous media.” J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 98, 84–102.
19.
Roberts, F. L., Kandhal, P. S., Brown, E. R., Lee, D. Y., and Kennedy, T. W. ( 1994). Hot mix asphalt materials: Mixture, design, and construction, NAPA Education Foundation, Lanham, Md.
20.
Romero, P., and Mogawer, W. ( 1998a). “Evaluation of the Superpave shear tester using 19-mm mixtures from the Federal Highway Administration's accelerated loading facility.” J. Assn. of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 67, 573–601.
21.
Romero, P., and Mogawer, W. ( 1998b). “Evaluation of the Superpave shear tester's ability to discern two mixtures with different size aggregates using the FHWA's accelerated loading facility.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1630, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 69–76.
22.
Stroup-Gardiner, M., Newcomb, D. E., and Savage, D. ( 1994). “Defining specification limits with respect to testing variability.” J. Assn. of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 63, 561–592.
23.
Stuart, K., and Izzo, R. ( 1996). “Hot mix asphalt pavement construction: Report for the 1993–1998 ALF project.” Rep. Prepared for Fed. Hwy. Admin., McLean, Va.
24.
Superpave Models Team. ( 1998). “Interim task report: Preliminary recommendation for the simple performance test.” Rep. Prepared for Fed. Hwy. Admin. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Md.
25.
Weissman, S. L., Sackman, J. L., Harvey, J., and Long, F. ( 1999). “Selection of laboratory test specimen dimensions for permanent deformation of asphalt concrete pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1681, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 113–120.
26.
Williams, R. C., Romero, P., and Stuart, K. ( 1998). “Comparison of Superpave shear tester results to Westrack performance.” Symp. on Hwy. and Runway Pavement Technol., Int. Conf. of Computational Engrg. and Sci. (ICES'98).
27.
Zhang, X. ( 1997). “Evaluating Superpave performance prediction models using a controlled laboratory experiment.” J. Assn. of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 66, 211–244.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 13 • Issue 1 • February 2001
Pages: 77 - 84
History
Received: Feb 5, 1999
Published online: Feb 1, 2001
Published in print: Feb 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.