Mechanical Grading of Oak Timbers
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 11, Issue 2
Abstract
For many wood species, the grading of timbers [>76 mm (>4-in.) thick] has not changed in decades. Most timbers are still visually graded by methods that originated in the 1930s. Mechanical grading procedures used to accurately grade 38-mm (2-in. nominal) dimension lumber have not been adapted for use with timbers. Furthermore, the only reliable timber test data available for most softwood species were obtained near the turn of the 20th century, and no test data are available for hardwood timber. The lack of better grading procedures and test data makes it likely that current property assignments for timbers are wasteful. Given that the reduced availability of lumber is expected to continue well into the 21st century, the structural engineer must have the widest possible options for structural timbers. Therefore, a study was conducted by the USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, to examine use of a pulse echo stress wave technique along the length of timbers to estimate modulus of elasticity (MOE) of green timbers and the development of a machine stress rated grade for oak timbers. Two hundred and ninety-five untreated 178- by 229-mm (7- by 9-in.) mixed oak timbers, 4.9 m (16 ft) in length, were measured, weighted, and nondestructively evaluated to determine their pulse echo MOE. Two hundred twenty were destructively tested in bending; 75 were tested to failure in compression parallel to the grain. The results of these tests determined relationships between pulse echo MOE and static bending MOE and between bending and compressive strength. These tests suggests a clear potential of establishing a machine stress rated grade for oak timbers. This article discusses the implication of these results, potential commercial grades, and a follow-up study to qualify the suggested grades.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bones, J. T. ( 1990). “Hardwood forest resources of the United States.” The Hardwood Industry in the 1990s. Charleston, W.Wa.
2.
Cline, M., and Heim, A. L. ( 1912). “Tests of structural timbers.” Bull. 108. USDA, Forest Service. Washington, D.C.
3.
“Direct moisture content measurement of wood-based materials.” (1994). D 4442, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
4.
Falk, Robert H., Green, D. W., Lantz, S. C., and Fix, M. R. ( 1995). “Recycled lumber and timber.” Restructuring: America and beyond: Proc., 13th Struct. Congr. M. Saayei, ed. ASCE, New York, 1065–1068.
5.
Green, D. W., and Kretschmann, D. E. ( 1991). “Lumber property relationships for engineering design standards.” Wood and Fiber Sci., 23(3), 436–456.
6.
Green, D. W., and Kretschmann, D. E. ( 1997). “Properties and grading of southern pine timbers.” Forest Products J., 47(9), 78–85.
7.
Green, D. W., Kretschmann, D. E., Wolcott, M., and Ross. R. J. ( 1996). “Mechanical grading of timbers for transportation industry.” Proc., Nat. Conf. on Wood Transp. Struct.
8.
Green, D. W., Ross R. J., and McDonald, K. A. ( 1993). “Production of hardwood machine stress rated lumber.” Proc., 9th Int. Symp. on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. Forest Products Society, Madison, Wis., 141–150.
9.
Green, D. W., Shelley, B. E., and Vokey, H. P. ( 1989). “In-grade testing of structural lumber.” Proc., Forest Products Society, Madison, Wis.
10.
Haynes, R. W., Adams, D. M., and Mills, J. R. ( 1993). “The 1993 RPA timber assessment update.” RM-GTR-259, USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colo.
11.
National design specification for wood construction supplement: Design values for wood construction. (1992). Revised 1991 Ed., American Forest and Paper Association, Washington, D.C.
12.
Schad, K. C., Kretschmann D. E., McDonald K. A., Ross, R. J., and Green D. W. ( 1995). “Stress wave techniques for determining quality of dimensional lumber from switch ties.” FPL-RN-0265, USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wis.
13.
“Standard grading rules for northeastern lumber.” (1991). Northeast Lumber Manufacturers Association, Cumberland Center, Maine.
14.
“Standard grading rules for southern pine lumber.” (1994a). Southern Pine Inspection Bureau, Pensacola, Fla.
15.
“Standard methods for determination of allowable properties from tests of full-sized dimension lumber.” (1994b). D 1990, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
16.
“Standard methods for evaluating allowable properties for grades of structural lumber.” (1994c). D 2915, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
17.
“Standard methods of static tests of lumber in structural sizes.” (1994d). D 198, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
18.
“Standard practice for establishing structural grades and related allowable properties for visually graded lumber.” (1994e). D 245, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
19.
“Standard test methods for establishing clear wood strength values.” (1994f). D 2555, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
20.
“Standard test methods for specific gravity of wood and wood-base materials.” (1994g). D 2395, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
21.
Wood as an engineering material. (1987). Agric. Handbook 72, Revised., USDA, Forest Products Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 466.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: May 1, 1999
Published in print: May 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.