Comparison of Perception versus Reality in Timber Bridge Performance
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 4
Abstract
Bridge material selection is one of the most difficult decisions an engineer has to make. Many factors and individuals are often involved in choosing the proper bridge material for a given site and location. Physical factors such as strength and lifespan of material, and also site specific factors like roadway alignment and traffic count, play important roles in material selection. Often state Department of Transportation engineers, private consulting engineers, and local highway officials all play roles in the material selection process. Each individual may have his/her own perception of bridge materials based upon past experience and education, and little is known about how these perceptions influence the choice of materials. In this study, perceptions of engineers and highway officials toward timber as a bridge material in four selected states were compared to the actual performance of timber as reported in the National Bridge Inventory. Highway officials and engineers in Mississippi, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin were surveyed by mail and personally interviewed to capture their perceptions toward timber as it compared to other major bridge materials (prestressed concrete, steel, and reinforced concrete). This information was compared with the actual performance data obtained from the National Bridge Inventory. The results indicate that there is a strong correlation between highway officials' perceptions toward bridge materials and the reported performance of these materials.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Clapp, V.(1990). “Timber bridges in the real world.”Wood Design Focus, 1(3), 19–20.
2.
Dunker, K., and Rabbet, B.(1990). “Highway bridge type and performance patterns.”J. Perf. Constr. Fac., ASCE, 4(3), 161–173.
3.
Luppold, H. (1990). “Southern pine usage and timber bridge status of ten southeastern states highway departments.” H. Luppold and Associates, Holly Hill, S.C., 89.
4.
Smith, R., and Bush, R.(1996). “Nonstructural evaluation of competing bridge materials.”J. Mat. in Civ. Engrg., 8(2), 88–93.
5.
Stanfill-McMillan, K., and Hatfield, C. (1995). “Performance of timber bridges compared to concrete, steel, and prestressed concrete bridges—analysis of the 1992 national bridge inventory.” U.S. Dept. of Agr. Forest Service, Forest Products Lab., Madison, Wis.
6.
U.S. Dept. of Transp., Fed. Hwy. Admin. (1992). “National bridge Inventory Data.” U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1998
Published in print: Nov 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.