Lunar‐Base Construction Equipment and Methods Evaluation
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 3
Abstract
A process for evaluating lunar‐base construction equipment and methods concepts is presented. The process is driven by the need for more quantitative, systematic, and logical methods for assessing further research and development requirements in an area where uncertainties are high, dependence upon terrestrial heuristics is questionable, and quantitative methods are seldom applied. Decision theory concepts are used in determining the value of accurate information and the process is structured as a construction‐equipment‐and‐methods selection methodology. Total construction‐related, earth‐launch mass is the measure of merit chosen for mathematical modeling purposes. The work is based upon the scope of the lunar base as described in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Office of Exploration's “Exploration Studies Technical Report, FY 1989 Status.” Nine sets of conceptually designed construction equipment are selected as alternative concepts. It is concluded that the evaluation process is well suited for assisting in the establishment of research agendas in an approach that is first broad, with a low level of detail, followed by more‐detailed investigations into areas that are identified as critical due to high degrees of uncertainty and sensitivity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bell, L., and Boles, W. (1991). “Operations analysis for lunar surface construction: Results from two office of exploration case studies.” Tech. Report M‐91/21, U.S. Army, Constr. Engrg. Res. Lab., Champaign, Ill.
2.
Boles, W. (1990). “Lunar base construction,” PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
3.
Duke, M. (1990). “A proposal for risk sharing in the development of a lunar oxygen plant.” Engineering, construction, and operations in space, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, N.Y.
4.
“Exploration studies technical report, FY 1989 Status.” (1989). NASA Office of Exploration, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Tex.
5.
Maryniak, G. (1988). “Use of non‐terrestrial materials for large‐scale space activities.” Engineering, construction, and operations in space, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, N.Y.
6.
McNamee, P., and Celona, J. (1987). Decision analysis for the professional with supertree. The Scientific Press, Redwood City, Calif.
7.
Register, B. (1989). Proc. Workshop on Extraterrestrial Mining and Constr. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
8.
“Report of the in situ resources utilization workshop.” (1987). NASA conference publication 3017. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C.
9.
“Report on the 90‐day study on human exploration of the moon and Mars.” (1989). National Aeronautics and Space Administrtion, Washington, D.C.
10.
Simon, M. (1985). “A parametric analysis of lunar oxygen production.” Lunar bases and space activities of the 21st century, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Tex.
11.
“Special study of the research and development effort required to provide a U.S. lunar construction capability.” (1963). Final Report, Office of the Chf. of Engrs., Dept. of Army, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 6 • Issue 3 • July 1993
Pages: 217 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 11, 1991
Published online: Jul 1, 1993
Published in print: Jul 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.