Damage and Distortion Criteria for Residential Slab-on-Grade Structures
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 13, Issue 3
Abstract
Various criteria have been suggested throughout the geotechnical and construction community for maximum allowable differential movement for foundation systems. However, the writers have found very few papers pertaining just to slab-on-grade systems. Furthermore, our literature review indicates that most of these criteria have been developed through studies of soil settlement, irrespective of other modes of soil movement, and do not necessarily pertain to residential slab-on-grade structures. There are many different soil/geologic processes that can operate at a given site, each of which can affect the performance of an overlying structure in a different manner. For example, at the same development a house founded on fill of varying depths (differential fill) may settle somewhat uniformly, producing little distortion, whereas a house founded on expansive bedrock may experience “heave” or “edge curl,” resulting in higher levels of foundation distortion. The house settling uniformly may experience an overall differential movement of 2.5 in. with only minor damage, whereas the house affected by expansive soil influence may experience greater levels of damage with an overall differential movement of only 1.50 in. This is because the angular distortion is much greater along the area of influence. Understanding various patterns of movement for different soil conditions is very important and should be considered when designing or reviewing residential slab-on-grade foundations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Boone, S. J. (1996). “Ground-movement-related building damage.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 122(11), 886–896.
2.
Burland, J. B., and Wroth, C. P. (1974). “Allowable and differential settlement of structures, including damage and soil-structure interaction.” Proc., Conf. on Settlement of Struct., Pentech Press, Cambridge, England, U.K., 611–654.
3.
Day, R. W. (1990). “Differential movement of slab-on-grade structures.”J. Perf. Constr. Fac., ASCE, 4(4), 236–241.
4.
Day, R. W. (1998). “Settlement behavior of post-tensioned slabs-on-grade.”J. Perf. Constr. Fac., ASCE, 12(2), 56–61.
5.
Koenig, A. S. ( 1991 ). “Relative elevation data analysis on newly constructed residential foundations.” Proc., ASCE Texas Section Meeting.
6.
Skempton, A. W., and MacDonald, D. H. (1956). “The Allowable Settlement of Buildings.” Proc., Inst. of Civ. Engrs., Vol. 5, Part 3, 727–768.
7.
Subsidence engineers handbook. (1975). National Coal Board, London.
8.
Thornburn, S., and Hutchison, J. F., (1985). Underpinning. Surrey University Press.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Jun 1, 1998
Published online: Aug 1, 1999
Published in print: Aug 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.