National Program to Improve Seismic Performance of Steel Frame Buildings
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 12, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper reviews the performance of welded steel moment frame buildings during the Northridge earthquake. Some of the studies being undertaken in the United States as part of the FEMA-funded SAC Steel Project are described. The intent of these studies is to devise improved methods for designing new steel frame structures; for inspecting, evaluating, and repairing seismic damage to these types of structures following a major earthquake; and for inspecting, evaluating, and retrofitting existing at-risk steel frame buildings. General observations resulting from these studies are highlighted and the overall format for the new design provisions is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alali, J., et al. (1995). “Analytical and field investigations of buildings affected by the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994.”Rep. SAC 95-04, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
2.
Anderson, J., et al. (1995). “Case studies of steel moment frame building performance in the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994.”Rep. SAC 95-07, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
3.
Anderson, J., and Johnston, R.(1998). “Performance of steel frame building which experienced intense ground motion.”J. Perf. of Constr. Fac., ASCE, 12(4), 186–198.
4.
Barnes, C., Englehardt, M., Fisher, J., Fowler, T., Kaufman, E., and Thewalt, C. (1995). “Experimental investigations of materials, weldments and nondestructive examination techniques.”Rep. SAC 95-08, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
5.
Barsom and Korvink, S. (1997). “Through-thickness properties of structural steels.”Background Document SAC/BD-97/01, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
6.
Bertero, V., et al. (1996). “Experimental investigations of beam-column subassemblages.”Rep. SAC 96-01, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
7.
Bonowitz, D., Durkin, M., Gates, W., Morden, M., and Youssef, N. (1995). “Surveys and assessment of damage to buildings affected by the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994.”Rep. SAC 95-06, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
8.
Campbell, S., et al. (1995). “Parametric analytical investigations of ground motion and structural response, Northridge earthquake of January 14, 1997.”Rep. SAC 95-05, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
9.
Chi, W.-M., Deierlein, G., and Ingraffea, A. (1997). “Finite element fracture mechanics investigation of welded beam-column connections.”Background Document SAC/BD-97/05, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
10.
Clark, P., Frank, K., Krawinkler, H., and Shaw, R. (1997). “Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing and documentation of beam-column tests and other experimental specimens.”Background Document SAC/BD-97/02, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
11.
Deierlein, G.(1998). “Summary of SAC case study building analyses.”J. Perf. of Constr. Fac., ASCE, 12(4), 202–212.
12.
El-Tawil, S., Mikesell, T., Vidarsson, E., and Kunnath, S. (1998). “Strength and ductility of FR welded-bolted connections.”Background Document SAC/BD-98/01, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
13.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1995). “Interim guidelines: Evaluation, repair, modification and design of welded steel moment frame structures.”Rep. FEMA 267, Washington, D.C.
14.
FEMA. (1996). “Background reports on metallurgy, fracture mechanics, welding, moment connections and frame system behavior.”Rep. FEMA 288, Washington, D.C.
15.
FEMA. (1997a). “Connection test summaries.”Rep. FEMA 289, Washington, D.C.
16.
FEMA. (1997b). “Interim guidelines advisory no. 1—supplement to FEMA 267.”Rep. FEMA 267A, Washington, D.C.
17.
Gates, W.(1998). “Summary interpretation of SAC survey data on damaged welded steel moment frames.”J. Perf. of Constr. Fac., ASCE, 12(4), 180–185.
18.
Hajjar, J., Gourley, B., O'Sullivan, D., and Leon, R.(1998). “Analysis of mid-rise steel frame damaged in Northridge earthquake.”J. Perf. of Constr. Fac., ASCE, 12(4), 221–231.
19.
Holguin, R.(1998). “Building department's response to EQ damage to steel frame buildings.”J. Perf. of Constr. Fac., ASCE, 12(4), 199–201.
20.
O'Sullivan, D., Hajjar, J., and Leon, R.(1998). “Repairs to mid-rise steel frame damaged in Northridge earthquake.”J. Perf. of Constr. Fac., ASCE, 12(4), 213–220.
21.
SAC Joint Venture. (1994). “Invitational workshop on steel seismic issues.”Proc., Rep. SAC 94-01, Sacramento, Calif.
22.
SAC Joint Venture. (1996). “Selected documents for the U.S.-Japan workshop on steel fracture issues.”Background Document SAC/BD-96/03, Richmond, Calif.
23.
Somerville, P., Graves, R., and Saikia, C. (1995). “Characterization of ground motions during the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994.”Rep. SAC 95-03, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
24.
Somerville, P., Smith, N., Punyamurthula, S., and Sun, J. (1997). “Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project.”Background Document SAC/BD-97/04, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
25.
Tobin, T. (1998). “Barriers to implementation of improved design provisions for steel construction, workshop proceedings.”Draft Background Document, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif. Uniform building code . (1994). International Congress of Building Officials, Whittier, Calif.
26.
Wen, Y. (1997). “Proposed statistical and reliability framework for comparing and evaluating predictive models for evaluation and design.”Background Document SAC/BD-97/03, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1998
Published in print: Nov 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.