The Oklahoma City Bombing: Summary and Recommendations for Multihazard Mitigation
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 12, Issue 3
Abstract
From visual inspection and analysis of the damage that occurred in the Murrah Building as a result of a blast caused by a large truck bomb, it is shown that progressive collapse extended the damage beyond that caused directly by the blast. The type of damage that occurred and the resulting collapse of nearly half the building is consistent with what would be expected for an ordinary moment frame building of the type and detailing available in the mid-1970s when subjected to the blast from such a large truck bomb. Using information developed for the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, types of structural systems that would provide significant increases in toughness to structures subjected to catastrophic loading from events such as major earthquakes and blasts are identified. One of these systems is compartmentalized construction, in which a large percentage of the building has structural walls that are reinforced to provide structural integrity in case the building is damaged. Two additional types of detailing, used in areas of high seismicity, are special moment frame construction and dual systems with special moment frames (herein referred to as dual systems). This paper shows that compartmentalized construction, special moment frames, and dual systems provide the mass and toughness necessary to reduce the effects of extreme overloads on buildings. Consequently, it is recommended that these structural systems be considered where a significant risk of seismic and/or blast damage exists.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“Building code requirements for reinforced concrete.” (1971). ACI 318-71, ACI Committee 318, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich.
2.
Corley, W. G., Sozen, M. A., Thornton, C. H., and Mlakar, P. F. (1996). “The Oklahoma City bombing: improving building performance through multi-hazard mitigation.”FEMA Bulletin 277, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
3.
“Effects of impact and explosion.” (1946). Summary Tech Rep. Div. 2, Vol. 1. National Defense Research Committee, Washington, D.C.
4.
McVay, M. K. (1988). “Spall damage of concrete structures.”U.S. Army Engr. Wtrwy. Experiment Station Tech. Rep. SL-88-22. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
5.
NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program) recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. I: Provisions; FEMA-222A. Building Seismic Safety Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
6.
“Seismic safety of existing federally owned or leased buildings; Executive Order 12941.” (1994). Federal Register. 59 (No. 232; December 5).
7.
“Seismic safety of federal and federally assisted or regulated new building construction; Executive Order 12699.” (1990). Federal Register. 55 (January 5).
8.
Sozen, M. A., Thornton, C. H., Corley, W. G., and Mlakar, P. F.(1998). “The Oklahoma City bombing: Structural details and possible mechanisms for the Murrah Building.”J. Perf. Constr. Fac., ASCE, 12(3), 120–136.
9.
Todd, D. (ed.) (1994). “Standards of seismic safety for existing federally owned or leased buildings.”NISTIR 5382, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Technol. Administration, National Inst. of Standards and Technol., Interagency Comm. on Seismic Safety in Constr. Recommended Practice, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, Gaithersburg, Md.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1998
Published in print: Aug 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.