Bridge Corrosion Cost Model Implementation and Coating Maintenance Model Using Dynamic Programming
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 10, Issue 2
Abstract
This second of two papers studying the minimization of the cost of coating maintenance for steel bridges deals with two main topics: the computer implementation of a life-cycle cost analysis (developed in the first paper) in a spreadsheet environment using equivalent annual costs to compare three single maintenance strategies—spot repair, overcoat, and recoat; and the development of a coating maintenance model using the dynamic programming approach that can optimize combinations of maintenance procedures for minimum cost. The flexibility of the life-cycle cost spreadsheet implementation allows the user to adjust key parameters in order to account for variability in costs and environmental conditions between different regions in British Columbia. The program can be easily adapted for different climatic conditions. In addition, an on-line “Help” feature is provided to reduce the time needed to operate the program. The computer application and demonstrative example are described here and the source code is available on request. The second evolved coating maintenance model using the dynamic programming approach presented here minimizes the sum of the costs resulting from a sequence of rehabilitation choices (a combination of maintenance strategies). It is a more flexible analysis technique than the equivalent annual cost approach and can determine the optimal sequence of rehabilitation activities over the service life of the structure. The procedures developed in this analysis can be easily converted into algorithms for possible computer applications. Based on results from a preliminary analysis of in-service bridges with good coating condition assessments using the life-cycle cost and dynamic programming approaches, spot repair is the most cost-effective rehabilitation method. Overcoating is the second most effective strategy and recoating is usually the most expensive solution. However, the difficulty in obtaining adequate deterioration and cost functions for the coating systems will significantly reduce the accuracy of these analysis techniques. Therefore, a uniform data-collection system should be implemented so that a database will be available for these models.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ASTM. (1991). 1991 annual book of ASTM standards, Volume 06.01: Paints, related coatings, and aromatics. Philadelphia, Pa.
2.
de Neuville, R. (1990). Applied systems analysis, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
3.
Harper, W. V., et al. (1990). “Selection of ideal maintenance strategies in a network-level bridge management system.”Transp. Res. Rec. 1268, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C., 59–67.
4.
Jiang, J., and Sinha, K. C. (1989). “Dynamic optimization model for bridge management systems.”Transp. Res. Rec. 1211, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C., 92–100.
5.
McNeil, S., and Finn, A. M. (1987). “Expert system to cost feasible bridge-painting strategies.”Transp. Res. Rec. 1145, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C., 54–60.
6.
Quatro Pro for Windows. (1992). Version 1.00, Borland International, Inc., Scotts Valley, Calif.
7.
Stiemer, S. F., and Lo, D.(1988). “Formatted spreadsheets for engineers.”Microcomp. in Civ. Engrg., 3, 145–156.
8.
Tam, C. K., and Stiemer, S. F.(1996). “Development of a bridge corrosion cost model for coating maintenance.”J. Perf. of Constr. Fac., ASCE, 10(2), 47–56.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: May 1, 1996
Published in print: May 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.