Consideration of Design Life of Structures
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 9, Issue 3
Abstract
There has been a growing interest in research in the field of the service life of structures due to a perceived lack of performance of built structures in the last several decades. To address this issue, it has been suggested that more emphasis should be given to in-service performance of a structure that could possibly be based on design-life concepts. Applying such concepts, with the numerous variables and parameters involved, is a complex issue. The present paper summarizes the findings of recent research, showing possible approaches to the consideration of design-life concepts as well as some discussion of the difficulties associated with them. The life span of a structure is broken up into the typical stages of progression, that is, conceptual design, final design, construction, and maintenance and repair, with the various influences identified and discussed at each of these stages. It followed from our research that quality-control and quality-assurance procedures at the design and construction stage have considerable influence on the design life of a structure. It was found that further developments in these areas are needed if the durability of a structure is to be predicted.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Burns, J. G. (1992). “Design life of buildings: client expectations.”The design life of structures, G. Somerville, ed., Blackie and Sons, Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow, U.K., 240–245.
2.
Chan, W. W. L. (1992). “Loads and loads effects.”The design life of structures. G. Somerville, ed., Blackie and Sons, Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow, U.K., 40–46.
3.
Davies, P. R. B. (1992). “The contractor's role.”The design life of structures. G. Somerville, ed., Blackie and Sons, Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow, U.K., 229–232.
4.
Fletcher, M. S.(1991). “Technical aspects: designer.”Struct. Engr., 69(7), 154–155.
5.
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering. (1989). Durability of structures, Lisbon, Portugal, 57(1–2).
6.
Ishizuka, Y.(1983). “The degradation and prediction of service life of building components.”Durability of Build. Mat., 1(1), 345–352.
7.
Masters, L. W. (1984). “Problems in service life predictions of building and construction materials.”Proc., NATO Adv. Res. Workshop, Paris, France.
8.
Menzies, J. B. (1992). “Design life and populations of buildings.”The design life of structures. G. Somerville, ed., Blackie and Sons, Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow, U.K., 166–172.
9.
National Research Council. (1991). Pay now or pay later: controlling cost of ownership from design throughout the service life of public buildings . Building Research Board, Committee on Setting Federal Construction Standards to Control Building Life-Cycle Costs, Washington, D.C.
10.
Neely, E. S. Jr., and Neathammer, R.(1991). “Life-cycle maintenance costs by facility use.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 117(2), 310–320.
11.
Novick, D.(1990). “Life-cycle considerations in urban infrastructure engineering.”J. Mgmt. in Engrg., ASCE, 6(2), 186–196.
12.
Quality Systems—CAN/CSA—Q9000—91 Series. (1991). Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale (Toronto), Canada.
13.
Quinion, D. W.(1991). “The way ahead.”Struct. Engr., 69(7), 155–156.
14.
Schlaich, J., and Potzl, M. (1992). “Some thoughts on the application of design life principles in practice.”The design life of structures. G. Somerville, ed., Blackie and Sons, Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow, U.K., 47–56.
15.
Schmalz, T. C. (1994). “A contribution to design life and life cycle considerations of structures,” MSc thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
16.
Sentler, L.(1987). “Service life predictions of concrete structures.”Durability of Build. Mat., 5(1), 81–98.
17.
Stillman, J. (1992). “Design life and the new code.”The design life of structures. G. Somerville, ed., Blackie and Sons, Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow, U.K., 3–8.
18.
Tam, C. K. (1994). “A study of bridge coating maintenance,” MSc thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
19.
Webber, H. P. (1992). “The clients view—the public sector.”The design life of structures. G. Somerville, ed., Blackie and Sons, Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow, U.K., 9–19.
20.
White, K. H. (1992). “Performance approach.”The design life of structures. G. Somerville, ed., Blackie and Sons, Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow, U.K., 30–39.
21.
Woodd, R. B. (1992). “The contractors contribution to design life.”The design life of structures. G. Somerville, ed., Blackie and Sons, Ltd., Bishopbriggs, Glasgow, U.K., 68–73.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 9 • Issue 3 • August 1995
Pages: 206 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1995
Published in print: Aug 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.