Model for Severity of Hurricanes in Gulf of Mexico
Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 3
Abstract
Observational and theoretical evidence suggests hurricane severity can be affected by local oceanographic features. The most important of these features in the Gulf of Mexico are the Loop current and its associated eddies. These features are large bodies of warm subsurface water that, theory suggests, can act as an energy source for passing hurricanes. Present design standards for the offshore oil industry assume no spatial variability, so these findings have substantial financial implications for design of new structures and requalification of thousands of existing ones. We propose a statistical model and an estimation procedure that accounts for the spatial variation of the probability distribution function of hurricane severity. The model is based on the representation of the hurricane process as a marked line process where the hurricane tracks are idealized as linear segments with respect to a given location, and where the marks measure the severity of hurricanes. The efficiency of the estimation procedure is evaluated through simulations for different types of spatially dependent probability distribution functions. The procedure is finally applied to a data set comprising the 100 most severe hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico from 1900 to 1989.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chouinard, L. E. (1992). “Regional design wave heights in the Gulf of Mexico.”Proc., 24th Annu. Offshore Technol. Conf., OTC 6832, OTC, Houston, Tex., 223–234.
2.
Chouinard, L. E., and Liu, C. (1993). “Probability of severe hurricanes across the Gulf of Mexico.”Proc., Hurricanes of 1992 Conf., ASCE, New York, N.Y.
3.
Cooper, C. K. (1992). “A preliminary case for the existence of hurricane alleys in the Gulf of Mexico.”Proc., 24th Annu. Offshore Technol. Conf., OTC 6831, OTC, Houston, Tex., 213–222.
4.
Cornell, C. A.(1968). “Engineering seismic risk analysis.”Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 54(5), 1583–1606.
5.
Cressie, N. A. C. (1993). Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
6.
Diggle, P. J. (1983). Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
7.
Donoso, M. C. I., Le Mehaute, B., and Long, R. B.(1987). “Long-term statistics of maximum sea states during hurricanes.”J. Wtrwy., Port, Coast., and Oc. Engrg., ASCE, 113(6), 636–647.
8.
Elliot, B. A.(1982). “Anticyclonic rings in the Gulf of Mexico.”J. Phys. Oceanography, 12, 1292–1309.
9.
Emanuel, K. A.(1988). “Toward a general theory of hurricanes.”Am. Sci., 76, 371–379.
10.
Good, J. J., and Gaskins, R. S.(1980). “Density estimation and bump-hunting by the penalized likelihood method exemplified by scattering and meteorite data.”J. Am. Statistical Assoc., 75(369), 42–72.
11.
Haring, R. R., and Heideman, J. C. (1978). “Gulf of Mexico rare wave return periods.”Proc., 10th Annu. Offshore Technol. Conf., OTC 3229, OTC, Houston, Tex., 1523–1536.
12.
Robinson, M. K. (1973). “Atlas of monthly mean sea surface and subsurface temperature and depth of the top of the thermocline, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean Sea.”Rep., Scripps Inst. of Oceanography, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, San Diego, Calif.
13.
Rotunno, R., and Emanuel, K. A.(1987). “An air-sea interaction theory for tropical cyclones. Part II: Evolutionary study using a nonhydrostatic axisymmetric numerical model.”J. Atmospheric Sci., 44, 524–561.
14.
Russell, L. R.(1971). “Probability distributions for hurricane effects.”J. Wtrwy., Harb., and Coast. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 97(1), 139–154.
15.
Schade, L., Emanuel, K., and Cooper, C. (1994). “Ocean-atmosphere coupling and hurricanes.”Tech. Rep., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Massachusetts Inst. of Technol., Cambridge, Mass.
16.
Silverman, B. W. (1985). “Density estimation for statistics and data analysis.” John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
17.
Sutyrin, G. G., and Khain, A. P.(1984). “Effect of the ocean-atmosphere interaction on the intensity of a moving tropical cyclone, Investiya.”Atmospheric and Oceanic Phys., 20, 697–702.
18.
Tapia, R. A., and Thompson, J. R. (1978). Nonparametric probability density estimation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.
19.
Temple, R. F., Harington, D. L., and Martin, J. A. (1977). “Monthly temperature and salinity measurements of continental shelf waters of the northwestern Gulf of Mexico, 1963–1965.”NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS SSRF-707, Nat. Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency, Washington, D.C.
20.
Titterington, D. M., and Bowman, A. W.(1985). “A comparative study of smoothing procedures for ordered categorical data.”J. Statistical Comp. Simulations, 21, 291–312.
21.
Veneziano, D., and Chouinard, L. E. (1987). “Local models of seismicity and their estimation.”Proc., Symp. on Seismic Hazards, Ground Motions, Soil-Liquefaction and Engrg. Practice in Eastern North America, NCEER-87-0025, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, N.Y., 233–247.
22.
Ward, E. G., Borgman, L. E., and Cardone, V. J. (1978). “Statistics of hurricane waves in the Gulf of Mesico.”Proc., Offshore Technol. Conf., OTC 3229, OTC, Houston, Tex., 1523–1536.
23.
Wen, Y. K. (1988). “Environmental event combination criteria phase I: Risk analysis.”Rep., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
24.
Wen, Y. K., and Bannon, H. (1991). “Combination of wind, wave, and current loads in the Gulf of Mexico.”Proc., Offshore Mech. and Arctic Engrg. Conf., Vol. II, Safety and Reliability, Am. Soc. of Mech. Engrs., New York, N.Y., 41–47.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: May 1, 1997
Published in print: May 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.