Sea Level Rise Effects on Shoreline Position
Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 111, Issue 6
Abstract
Using a conservation of sand approach, the effects of a rising sea surface are quantified and separated from other causes of shore retreat. Sitespecific data important in predicting shoreline changes are: (1) Initial shoreface and backbeach profile; (2) subsequent backbeach profile; (3) relative sea level rise; (4) grain size distribution of sediment landward of the shoreface; and (5) net quantity of sand‐sized material that enters or leaves a specified coastal reach. A key element of the approach, Bruun's assumption of a shoreface is dynamic equilibrium with the sea surface, was evaluated and found to be reasonably accurate. Field application of the method shows that sea level rise accounts for about 53% of the total shore retreat of 5.5 m/yr measured at Smith Island, Virginia, and for about 88% of the measured, 1.7‐m/yr retreat of the barrier island south of Oregon Inlet, North Carolina. Net sand losses account for the remainder. Because shoreface adjustments are required to maintain an equilibrium profile, sand replenishment is probably the most realistic method to stabilize a shore against the effects of relative sea level rise. Conversely, a negative sediment budget may also be mitigated by structures which hinder the movement of sand away from a problem beach and enhance its deposition there.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allison, H., and Schwartz, M. L., “Bruun Rule, A Phenomenological Theory on Shore Erosion,” CSIRO, Division of Land Resources Management, Perth, Australia, Vol. 81, No. 3, Feb., 1981.
2.
Allison, H., “Enigma of the Bruun's Formula in Shore Erosion,” Proceedings of the Per Bruun Symposium, Newport, Rhode Island, International Geographical Union Commission on the Coastal Environment, Bureau for Facility Research, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Wash., Apr., 1980, pp. 67–78.
3.
Bruun, P., “Coast Erosion and the Development of Beach Profiles,” TM‐44, U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers, Beach Erosion Board, Washington, D.C., June, 1954.
4.
Bruun, P., “Sea Level Rise as a Cause of Erosion,” Journal of the Watenuays and Harbors Division, ASCE, No. WW1, Feb., 1962, pp. 117–133.
5.
Bruun, Per, “Review of Conditions for Uses of the Bruun Rule of Erosion,” Coastal Engineering, Vol. 7, 1983, pp. 77–89.
6.
Dean, R. G., “Equilibrium Beach Profiles: U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts,” Ocean Engineering Technical Report No. 12, University of Delaware, Newark, Del., Jan., 1977.
7.
Donn, W. L., Farrand, W. R., and Ewing, M., “Pleistocene Ice Volumes and Sea Level Lowering,” Journal of Geology, No. 70, 1962, pp. 206–214.
8.
DuBois, R. N., “Support and Refinement of the Bruun Rule on Beach Erosion,” Journal of Geology, Vol. 83, 1975, pp. 651–657.
9.
Etkins, R., and Epstein, E. S., “The Rise of Global Mean Sea Level as an Indication of Climatic Change,” Science, Vol. 215, Jan., 1982, pp. 287–289.
10.
Everts, C. H., Battley, P. P., and Gibson, P. N., “Shoreline Movements, Report 1, Cape Henry, Virginia, to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, 1849–1980,” Technical Report CERC‐83‐1, U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., July, 1983.
11.
Everts, C., “Geometry of Profiles Across Some Intercontinental Shelves of the United States,” TP 78‐4, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, Va., Apr., 1978.
12.
Hands, E. B., “Some Data Points on Shoreline Retreat Attributable to Coastal Subsidance,” Publication No. 121, Proceedings of the Anaheim Symposium, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Dec., 1976, pp. 629–645.
13.
Hicks, S. D., Debaugh, H. A., Jr., and Hickman, L. H., Jr., “Sea Level Variations for United States 1855–1980,” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA‐NOS, Rockville, Md., Jan., 1983.
14.
Holdahl, S. R., and Morrison, N. L., “Regional Investigations of Vertical Crustal Movements in the U.S. Using Precise Relevelings and Mareograph Data,” Tectanophysics, Vol. 33, 1974, pp. 373–390.
15.
National Research Council, “Changing Climate, Report of the Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee,” Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1983.
16.
Pilkey, O. H., “Geologists, Engineers, and a Rising Sea Level,” Northeastern Geology, Vol. 3, Nos. 3/4, 1981, pp. 150–158.
17.
Position Paper, “Saving the American Beach: A Position Paper by Concerned Coastal Geologists,” Results of the Skidaway Institute of Oceanography Conference on America's Eroding Shoreline, 25–27 March 1981, Savannah, Ga.
18.
Price, W. A., “Correlation of Shoreline Type with Offshore Condition in the Gulf of Mexico,” Second Coastal Geography Conference, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, 1954, pp. 11–30.
19.
Rosen, P. S., “An Application of the Bruun Rule in the Chesapeake Bay,” Proceedings of the Per Bruun Symposium, Newport, R.I., International Geographical Union Commission on the Coastal Environment, Bureau for Facility Research, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Wash., Apr., 1980, pp. 55–62.
20.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, “National Shoreline Study,” 1972.
21.
Weggel, R., “A Method for Estimating Long‐Term Erosion Rates from a Long‐Term Rise in Water Level,” CETA 79‐2, CERC, USCE, Ft. Belvoir, Va., 1979.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 111 • Issue 6 • November 1985
Pages: 985 - 999
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1985
Published in print: Nov 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.