Evaluating Watershed Management within a River Basin Context Using an Integrated Indicator System
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 136, Issue 2
Abstract
Factor analysis is used to develop an integrated indicator system that evaluates the state of watersheds from three perspectives (subindexes): water-use management, flood management, and environment and ecosystem management. The system, which has a total of nine indicators, is applied to evaluate the state of watershed management in the Han River basin, South Korea. For all the subindexes, preliminary tests, namely, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test and the Bartlett test of sphericity, are conducted to evaluate the suitability of the data collected for factor analysis. The variables related to each subindex are then grouped into three factors (indicators) with the variables’ statistical characteristics taken into account. The results of the application of the system to the case study show that the indicator system reasonably depicts the state of the watersheds in the Han River basin and can be effectively applied to resolve concerns in watershed management; the system is one of the inevitable elements in the adaptive watershed management process. Examining the correlations between the indicators proves that the selection of the indicators and their variables is appropriate from a statistical perspective. In addition to providing evaluation information about the state of watersheds from multiple perspectives, the system can be used as a preprocessing step for watershed management modeling regarding the choice of watershed variables within the context of river basins.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs of South Korea is thanked for publishing data collected by the watershed investigation project. The writers appreciate the useful comments of the Editor, Associate Editor, and the anonymous reviewers.
References
Associated Programme on Flood Management (APFM). (2004). Integrated flood management: Concept paper, APFM, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cai, X., McKinney, D. C., and Lasdon, L. S. (2002). “A framework for sustainability analysis in water resources management and application to the Syr Darya Basin.” Water Resour. Res., 39(6), 1085–1098.
Cai, X., McKinney, D. C., and Lasdon, L. S. (2003). “Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129(1), 4–17.
Freedman, P. L., Nemura, A. D., and Dilks, D. W. (2004). “Viewing total maximum daily loads as a process, not a singular value: Adaptive watershed management.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(6), 695–702.
Friel, C. M. (2008). “Factor analysis.” ⟨http://www.shsu.edu/~icc_cmf/cj_742/ststs9.doc⟩ (Nov. 10, 2008).
Global Water Partnership Technical Advisory Committee (GWPTAC). (2000). Integrated water resources management, Global Water Partnership, Stockholm, Sweden.
He, C., Malcolm, S. B., Dahlberg, K. A., and Fu, B. (2000). “A conceptual framework for integrating hydrological and biological indicators into watershed management.” Landsc. Urban Plann., 49, 25–34.
Heathcote, I. W. (1998). Integrated watershed management, Wiley, New York.
Iyer, K. C., and Jha, K. N. (2006). “Critical factors affecting schedule performance: Evidence from Indian construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(8), 871–881.
Kang, M. G., Jung, C. Y., and Lee, G. M. (2007). “Extraction of primary factors influencing dam operation using factor analysis.” J. Korean Water Resour. Associ., 40(10), 769–781 (in Korean).
Kang, M. G., Lee, G. M., and Kim, J. K. (2005). “Assessment of water resources sustainability of a watershed using integrated index.” Proc., XXXI Int. Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research Congress, IAHR, Seoul, South Korea.
Maryland Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). (2008). “Maryland’s surf your watershed.” ⟨http://www.dnr.state.md.us/watersheds/surf/index.html⟩ (Nov. 10, 2008).
Ministry of Construction and Transportation (MOCT). (2005). Reports of the Han River basin investigation, Seoul, South Korea (in Korean).
Nandagiri, L., and Kovoor, G. (2006). “Performance evaluation of reference evapotranspiration equation across a range of Indian climates.” Irrig. Drain., 132(3), 238–249.
Panel on Adaptive Management for Resource Stewardship (PAMRS). (2004). Adaptive management for water resources project planning, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
Reimold, R. J. (1998). Watershed management: Practice, policies, and coordination, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sugumaran, R., Meyer, J. C., and Davis, J. (2004). “A web-based environmental decision support system (WEDSS) for environmental planning and watershed management.” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst., 6, 307–322.
Sullivan, C. A. (2001). “The potential for calculating a meaningful water poverty index.” Water Int., 26(4), 471–480.
Sullivan, C. A. (2002). “Calculating a water poverty index.” World Dev., 30(7), 1195–1210.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2002). Index of watershed indicators: An overview, EPA, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2008). Handbook for developing watershed plans to restore and protect our waters, EPA, Washington, D.C.
Scorecard. (2008). “Watershed indicators: Entire United States.” ⟨http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/water/iwi-us.tcl⟩ (Nov. 10, 2008).
Zhang, X. (2006). “Factor analysis of public clients’ best-value objective in public-privately partnered infrastructure projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(9), 956–965.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 12, 2008
Accepted: Sep 22, 2009
Published online: Feb 12, 2010
Published in print: Mar 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.