Comparison of Targeted Replacement and Vegetative Filter Strips for Sediment Control and Cost Effectiveness
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 135, Issue 5
Abstract
Two erosion control methods are compared for cost effectiveness in reducing sediment loading into the streams; targeted replacement of agricultural crops and placement of vegetative filter strips (VFS) along field drains. The first method implements an optimization approach for reducing sediment load through targeting and replacement of row crops in sensitive areas with switchgrass, such that watershed income is maximized while maintaining sediment load at a desired level. In the second approach, the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) was used with simplified grass filter model, a filter strip model, to estimate sediment load. The sediment load predicted for each hydrologic response unit in SWAT was input to a filter strip model which calculates the sediment trapped as flow passes through the filter strip. The study shows that placement of VFS along field drains is more cost effective compared to targeted replacement approach in reducing sediment load. However, the targeted replacement approach renders in situ soil conservation, because it reduces the amount of sediment generated on site compared to placement of VFS along field drains to trap sediment that has already been displaced. Further analysis was made to evaluate the relative benefits of placing vegetative filter strips on selected fields based on the sediment yield. The comparison was made between placing a VFS in all fields and placing VFSs on 75, 50, and 25% of the fields with the greatest sediment loads. It was found to be more effective to place small sized filter strips in as many land units as possible, as opposed to placing larger size VFSs on a few selected fields. It was also found to be slightly more beneficial to vary the width of the VFS in proportion to the size of the field contributing to the sediment inflow. In addition, the relative benefits of harvesting the VFS instead of designating the areas as the Conservation Reserve Program lands was evaluated. It was found that producers could obtain more income from harvesting the VFS than they would earn from water quality incentive payments while maintaining the same level of sediment reduction, resulting in a savings of conservation expenditures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering and Agricultural Economics Departments at Oklahoma State University. We also appreciate the technical support from people working on SWAT model development.
References
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 73–89.
Barfield, B. J., Blevins, R. L., Fogle, A. W., Madison, C. E., Inamdar, S., Carey, D. I., and Evangelou, V. P. (1998). “Water quality impacts of natural filter strips in karst areas.” Trans. ASAE, 41, 371–381.
Barfield, B. J., Tollner, E. W., and Hayes, J. C. (1978). “The use of grass filters for sediment control in strip mining drainage.” Theoretical studies on artificial media, Vol. 1, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington.
Chaubey, I., Edwards, D. R., Daniel, T. C., Moore, P. A., and Nichols, D. J. (1995). “Effectiveness of vegetative filter strips in controlling losses of surface-applied poultry litter constituents.” Trans. ASAE, 38(6), 1687–1692.
Dillaha, T. A., Reneau, R. B., Mostaghimi, S., and Lee, D. (1989). “Vegetative filters for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control.” Trans. ASAE, 32, 513–519.
Doye, D., Sahs, R., Kletke, D., and Harden, M. (2001). OSU enterprise software user’s guide, Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, Okla.
Farm Service Agency. (2004). “The conservation reserve program 26th signup.” U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., ⟨http://content.fsa.usda.gov/pas/crpconf04/crp_overview_june2004.pdf⟩ (Feb. 18, 2006).
Feather, P., Hellerstein, D., and Hansen, L. (1999). “Economic valuation of environmental benefits and the targeting of conservation programs: The case of the CRP.” AER-778, U.S. Dept. Agricultural Economic Research Service, ⟨http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer778/⟩ (May. 20, 2006).
Geza, M. (2006). “Environmental and economic modeling of non-point source pollution control: optimized land use systems and vegetative filter strips.” Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, Okla.
Hayes, J. C. (1979). “Evaluation of design procedures for vegetal filtration of sediment from flowing water.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky.
Hayes, J. C., Barfield, B. J., and Barnhisel, R. I. (1982). “The use of grass filters for sediment control in strip mine drainage. III: Empirical verification of procedures using real vegetation.” Rep. No. IMMR82/0, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky.
Hayes, J. C., Barfield, B. J., and Barnhisel, R. I. (1984). “Performance of grass filters under laboratory and field conditions.” Trans. ASAE, 27(5), 1321–1331.
Lee, K., Isenhart, T. M., Schultz, R. C., and Mickelson, S. K. (2000). “Multispecies riparian buffers trap sediments and nutrients during rainfall simulations.” J. Environ. Qual., 29, 1200–1205.
Osborn, C. T. (1993). “The conservation reserve program: Status, future and policy options.” J. Soil Water Conservat., 48, 272–279.
Patty, L., Rheal, B., and Gril, J. J. (1997). “The use of grass buffer strips to remove pesticides, nitrate and soluble phosphorus compounds from runoff water.” Pestic. Sci., 49, 243–251.
Tollner, E. W., Barfield, B. J., Haan, C. T., and Kao, T. Y. (1976). “Suspended sediment filtration capacity of simulated vegetation.” Trans. ASAE, 19(4), 678–682.
Wilson, L. G. (1967). “Sediment removal from flood water by grass filtration.” Trans. ASAE, 19, 109–239.
Young, R. A., Huntrods, R., and Anderson, W. (1980). “Effectiveness of vegetative buffer strips in controlling pollution from feedlot runoff.” J. Environ. Qual., 9, 483–487.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 14, 2007
Accepted: Feb 9, 2009
Published online: Aug 14, 2009
Published in print: Sep 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.