TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 1, 2008

Game Theoretical Approach to Conflict Resolution in Transboundary Water Resources Management

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 134, Issue 5

Abstract

Management of transboundary water resources has been the focus of many studies due to the observed water stress all over the globe combined with the continually increasing water demand. States sharing water resources often proceed to negotiations regarding water allocation issues and other managerial issues in order to settle their disputes. During such negotiations the use of appropriate tools, which will provide assistance to the opponent parties in terms of scenarios quantification and simulation processes, is a vital component toward conflict resolution. The present paper implements game theoretical concepts in the case study of Greek–Bulgarian negotiations on Nestos/Mesta transboundary river. The quantification of consequences caused by water flow decrease for different scenarios provides the background for estimations of compromising solutions that could be acceptable to both countries. Moreover, implementing interconnected games widens the countries’ available options and contributes to the avoidance of unreasonable outcomes while balancing uneven “power” potentials. The different utilities of the calculated payoffs to each country are leveled by the incorporation of socioeconomic factors reflecting the differences observed in the development level of the two countries.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Barreteau, O., Garin, P., Dumontier, A., and Abrami, G. (2003). “Agent-based facilitation of water allocation: Case study in the Drome River Valley.” Group Decis. Negotiation, 12(5), 441–461.
Becker, N., and Easter, K. W. (1999). “Conflict and cooperation in managing international water resources such as the Great Lakes.” Land Econ., 75(2), 233–245.
Bennett, L. L., and Howe, C. W. (1998a). “Factors affecting the performance of interstate river compacts as water allocation mechanisms.” Memo, School of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, Yale Univ., New Haven, Conn.
Bennett, L. L., Ragland, S. E., and Yolles, P. (1998b). “Facilitating international agreements through an interconnected game approach: The case of river basins.” Conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resources, R. E. Just and S. Netanyahu, eds., Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 381–400.
Bhaduri, A., and Barbier, E. B. (2003). “Water transfer and international river basin cooperative management. The case of the Ganges.” Dept. of Economics and Finance, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyo.
Bournaski, E., Ivanov, I., Eleftheriadou, E., and Mylopoulos, Y. (2006). “Towards integrated water resources management of the Mesta/Nestos Catchment by HEC-HMS modeling.” Int. Conf. on Water Observation and Information System for Decision Support.
Brandenberger, A., and Nalebuff, M. (1999). Co-opetition, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, New York.
Chen, Y., Kilgour, D. M., and Hipel, K. W. (2006). “Multiple criteria classification with an application in water resources planning.” Comput. Oper. Res., 33(11), 3301–3323.
Dinar, A., Ratner, A., and Yaron, D. (1992). “Evaluating cooperative game theory in water resources.” Theory Deci., 32(1), 1–20.
Dutta, P. K. (1999). Strategies and games: Theory and practice, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Eleftheriadou, E. (2006). “Conflict resolution in transboundary water resources management with the use of mathematical methods.” Ph.D. thesis, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eurostat. (2006). “Population and social conditions.” ⟨http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu⟩ (July 2006).
Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., and Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolution, Wiley, New York.
Folmer, H., von Mouche, P., and Ragland, S. (1993). “Interconnected games and international environmental problems.” Environ. Resource Economics, 3(4), 313–335.
Frisvold, G. B., and Caswell, M. F. (2000). “Transboundary water management: Game-theoretic lessons for projects on the US-Mexico border.” Am. J. Agric. Econom., 24(1), 101–111.
Ganoulis, J., Kolokytha, E., and Mylopoulos, Y. (2004). “Multicriterion decision analysis for conflict resolution in transboundary river basins.” Conf. on Integrated Water Management of Transboundary Catchments: A Contribution from Transcat, FEEM.
Just, R., and Netanyahu, S. (1998). “Facilitating international agreements through an interconnected game approach: The case of river basins.” Conflict and cooperation on transboundary water resources, R. E. Just and S. Netanyahu, eds., Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 4–61.
Kampragou, E., Eleftheriadou, E., and Mylopoulos, Y. (2006). “Implementing equitable water allocation in transboundary catchments: The case of River Nestos/Mesta.” Water Resour. Manage., 21(5), 909–918.
Kersten, G. E. (1997). “Support for group decisions and negotiations.” ⟨http://interneg.concordia.ca/interneg/research/papers/1997/04.pdf⟩ (Jul. 19, 2007).
Kilgour, D. M., and Dinar, A. (2001). “Flexible water sharing within an international river basin.” Environ. Resource Economics, 18, 43–60.
Kucukmehmetoglu, M., and Guldmann, J. (2002). “International water resources allocation and conflicts.” 42nd European Congress of the Regional Science Association, Dortmund, Germany.
Le Marquand, D. G. (1977). “International rivers: The politics of cooperation.” Univ. of British Columbia, Westwater Research Centre, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
Luce, R. D., and Raiffa, H. (1985). Games and decisions, Dover, New York (reprint, originally published by Wiley, New York, 1957).
Netanyahu, S., Just, R., and Horowitz, J. (1998). “Bargaining over shared aquifers: The case of Israel and the Palenstinians.” Conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resources, R. E. Just and S. Netanyahu, eds., Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Rogers, P. (1969). “A game theory approach to the problems of international river basins.” Water Resour. Res., 5(4), 749–760.
Seyam, I., Savenije, H. H. G., Aerts, J., and Schepel, M. (2000). “Algorithms for water resources distribution in international river basins.” Phys. Chem. Earth, Part A Solid Earth Geod., 25(3), 309–314.
Sheeman, M., and Kogiku, K. C. (1981). “Game theory analyses applied to water resource problems.” Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., 153, 109–118.
Thie, P. R. (1988). An introduction to linear programming and game theory, Wiley, New York.
Thoyer, S., Morardet, S., Rio, P., Simon, L., Goodhue, L., and Rausser, G. (2001). “A bargaining model to simulate negotiations between water users.” J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 4(2), ⟨http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/2/6.html⟩.
Wang, L., Fang, L., and Hipel, K. W. (2007). ”Mathematical programming approaches for modelling water rights allocation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 133(1), 50–59.
Wolf, A. (2001). “Transboundary waters: Sharing benefits, lessons learned.” Thematic Background Paper, prepared for the Secretariat of the Int. Conf. on Freshwater.
World Bank. (2006). “Country classification.” ⟨http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/DATASTATISTICS⟩ (July 2006).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 134Issue 5September 2008
Pages: 466 - 473

History

Received: Feb 7, 2007
Accepted: Nov 7, 2007
Published online: Sep 1, 2008
Published in print: Sep 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Eleni Eleftheriadou
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Division of Hydraulics and Environmental Engineering, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece. E-mail: [email protected]
Yannis Mylopoulos
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Division of Hydraulics and Environmental Engineering, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share