Uncertainty Analysis for Watershed Modeling Using Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation with Multiple Calibration Measures
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 134, Issue 2
Abstract
This study applied a generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) approach to a Hydrological Simulation Program—Fortran (HSPF) model used for the simulation of hydrology and transport of fecal coliform bacteria at Moore’s Creek, Va. The procedures of the GLUE application to Moore’s Creek HSPF model include: (1) a Latin hypercube sampling approach to generate multiple parameter sets from a prior specified parameter space; (2) utilization of multiple calibration measures to evaluate the performance of HSPF predictions associated with each parameter set and definition of acceptance criteria to select the acceptable parameter sets; (3) a fuzzy logic model to calculate the likelihood values of the acceptable parameter sets; and (4) estimation of the distributions and construction of the uncertainty bounds for HSPF flow and fecal coliform predictions. Among 50,000 randomly generated parameter sets, 381 parameter sets are accepted. These parameter sets can lead to various HSPF flow and fecal coliform simulations closely matching the observed data given the observation errors. The results suggest that the multiple acceptable parameter sets identified by GLUE provide a sound basis for decision makers to evaluate uncertain hydrologic and water quality responses to a potential watershed management option.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by funding from the Virginia Water Resources Research Center. The writers also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions that improved this work.
References
Aronica, G., Hankin, B., and Beven, K. (1998). “Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data.” Adv. Water Resour., 22(4), 349–365.
Beck, M. B. (1987). “Water quality modeling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 23(8), 1393–1442.
Benaman, J., and Shoemaker, C. A. (2004). “Methodology for analyzing ranges of uncertain model parameters and their impact on total maximum daily load process.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(6), 648–656.
Beven, K. (1993). “Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modeling.” Adv. Water Resour., 16(1), 41–51.
Beven, K. (2006). “A manifesto for the equifinality thesis.” J. Hydrol., 320, 18–36.
Beven, K., and Binley, A. (1992). “The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrolog. Process., 6(3), 279–298.
Beven, K., and Freer, J. (2001). “Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modeling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” J. Hydrol., 249(1–4), 11–29.
Blazkova, S., and Beven, K. (2002). “Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a catchment treated as ungauged (with uncertainty).” Water Resour. Res., 38(8), 1139.
Cardwell, H., and Ellis, J. H. (1993). “Stochastic dynamic programming models for water quality management.” Water Resour. Res., 29(4), 803–813.
Culver, T. B., Jia, Y., Tikoo, R., Simsic, J., and Garwood, R. (2002a). “Development of the total maximum daily load (TMDL) for fecal coliform bacteria in Moore’s Creek, Albemarle County, Virginia.” Submitted by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, ⟨http://www.deq.state.va.us/tmdl⟩.
Culver, T. B., Tikoo, R., Jia, Y., and Simsic, J. (2002b). “Evaluation of synthetic streamflow predictors for TMDL calibration.” Proc., 2002 Conf. on Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE/EWRI, Reston, Va.
Dilks, D. W., and Freedman, P. L. (2004). “Improved consideration of the margin of safety in total maximum daily load development.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(6), 690–694.
Donigian, Jr., A. S. (2002). “Watershed model calibration and validation: the HSPF experience.” Proc., National TMDL Science and Policy 2002, Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Va.
Foraste, A., Culver, T. B., and Taher, I. (2006). “Assessing the impact of loading rate uncertainties in TMDL allocations.” Proc., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2006, ASCE/EWRI, Reston, Va.
Foraste, J. A. (2006). “Assessing the impact of loading rate uncertainties on TMDL allocations.” MS thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.
Freer, J., Beven, K., and Ambroise, B. (1996). “Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and value of data: An application of the GLUE approach.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2161–2173.
Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O. (1998). “Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information.” Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 751–763.
Jang, J.-S. R., and Gulley, N. (1995). MATLAB fuzzy logic toolbox, The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Mass.
Jia, Y. (2004). “Robust optimization for total maximum daily load allocations.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.
Jia, Y., and Culver, T. B. (2003). “The bootstrapped artificial neural network Model for synthetic flow generation with a small data sample.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2003, Environmental & Water Resources Institute, ASCE/EWRI, Reston, Va.
Jia, Y., and Culver, T. B. (2004). “A methodology for robust Total Maximum Daily Load allocations.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2004, ASCE/EWRI, Reston, Va.
Jia, Y., and Culver, T. B. (2006a). “Bootstrapped artificial neural networks for synthetic flow generation with a small data sample.” J. Hydrol., 331(3–4), 580–590.
Jia, Y., and Culver, T. B. (2006b). “Robust optimization for total maximum daily load allocations.” Water Resour. Res., 42.
Langseth, D., and Brown, N. (2004). “An approach to establishing risk based margin of safety for total maximum daily loads for phosphorus in lakes.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE/EWRI, Reston, Va.
Lumb, A. M., McCammon, R. B., and Kittle, J. L., Jr. (1994). “Users manual for an expert system (HSPEXP) for calibration of the hydrological simulation program-Fortran.” Water-Resources Investigations Rep. No. 94-4168, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
MathWorks. (2002). Statistics toolbox for use with MATLAB, Natick, Mass.
Mckay, M. D. (1988). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis using a statistical sample of input values.” Uncertainty analysis, Y. Ronen, ed., CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 145–186.
Montanari, A. (2005). “Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations.” Water Resour. Res., 41.
Muleta, M. K., and Nicklow, J. W. (2005). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model.” J. Hydrol., 306(1–4), 127–145.
National Research Council (NRO). (2001). Assessing the TMDL approach to water quality management, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Potts, A. L. (2000). “Effects of hydrological calibration on water quality and watershed management.” MS thesis, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville Va.
Ross, T. J. (2004). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
U.S. EPA. (2000a). Estimating hydrology and hydraulic parameters for HSPF, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. (2000b). HSPFParm: An interactive database of HSPF model parameters, version 1.0, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
Zou, R., and Lung, W. (2004). “Robust water quality model calibration using an alternating fitness genetic algorithm.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 130(6), 471–479.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 21, 2005
Accepted: Mar 16, 2007
Published online: Mar 1, 2008
Published in print: Mar 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.