TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 2007

Strategic Decision Support for Resolving Conflict over Water Sharing among Countries along the Syr Darya River in the Aral Sea Basin

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 133, Issue 4

Abstract

The graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR), along with its associated decision support system GMCR II, are employed for systematically studying the strategic aspects of conflict existing among countries in the Aral Sea Basin of Central Asia. Competition for water is increasing in the central Asian countries in the Aral Sea Basin since they became independent in 1991. Disputes have developed between the three downstream countries, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, and the two upstream countries, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, in the basin in sharing water in its two main rivers, Syr Darya and Amu Darya. The downstream countries are heavy consumers of water for growing cotton while the upstream countries want to use more water for electricity generation and farming. Accordingly, GMCR II is utilized as a formal mechanism for better understanding the complex conflict existing at present among countries along the Syr Darya and for providing insights as to how these countries may interact with one another in attempting to reach a resolution acceptable to all. In particular, strictly following the present water allocation agreement by all parties is found to be the most preferred resolution for both the upstream and downstream countries.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to express their sincere gratitude to the anonymous referees and the editor whose insightful suggestions enhanced the quality of their paper.

References

Antipova, E., Zyrynov, A., McKinney, D., and Savitsky, A. (2002). “Optimization of Syr Darya water and energy uses.” Water Int., 27(4), 504–516.
Arnold, T. (1996). “Theory, history and the Western waterscape: The market culture thesis.” J. of the Southwest, 38(2), 215–240.
Bazerman, M. H., and Neale, M. A. (1993). Negotiating rationally, Free Press, New York.
Critchlow, J. (1991). Nationalism in Uzbekistan, West View Press, Boulder, Colo.
De Bono, E. (1985). Conflicts: A better way to resolve them, Harrap, London.
Dukhovny, V., and Sokolov, V. (2002). “Lessons on cooperation building to manage water conflicts in the Aral Sea basin.” http://www.unesco.org/water/wwap/pccp/workgroups/Case_Study_Track/Case_Studies/ (Jan. 15, 2004).
Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., and Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolution, Wiley, New York.
Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., and Peng, X. (2003a). “A decision support system for interactive decision making. Part 1: Model formulation.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part C Appl. Rev., 33(1), 42–55.
Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., and Peng, X. (2003b). “A decision support system for interactive decision making. Part 2: Analysis and output interpretation.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., Part C Appl. Rev., 33(1), 56–66.
Fisher, R., and Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating without giving in, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Fraser, N. M., and Hipel, K. W. (1984). Conflict analysis: Models and resolutions, North-Holland, New York.
Gleick, P. H. (1993). “Water and conflict: Fresh water resources and international security.” Int. Secur., 18(1), 79–112.
Hampson, F. O., and Hart, M. (1995). Multilateral negotiations: Lessons from arms control, trade, and the environment, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Hipel, K. W. (2002a). “Conflict resolution.” Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS), Eolss, Oxford, U.K., http://www.eolss.net .
Hipel, K. W. (2002b). “Formal models for conflict resolution and case studies.” Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS), Eolss, Oxford, U.K., http://www.eolss.net .
Hipel, K. W., and Fang, L. (2005). “Multiple participant decision making in societal and technological systems.” Systems and human science—For safety, security, and dependability, T. Arai, S. Yamamoto, and K. Makino, eds., selected papers of the 1st Int. Symp., SSR2003, Osaka, Japan, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Chap. 1, 3–31.
Hipel, K. W., Fang, L., and Kilgour, D. M. (2007). “Decision support systems in water resources and environmental management.” J. Hydrol. Eng., in press.
Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., Fang, L., and Peng, X. (1997). “The decision support system GMCR II in environmental conflict management.” Appl. Math. Comput., 83(2–3), 117–152.
Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., Fang, L., and Peng, X. (2001). “Strategic decision support for the services industry.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 48(3), 358–369.
Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., and Rajabi, S. (1999). “Operations research and refinement of courses of action.” Handbook of systems engineering and management, Chap. 27, A. P. Sage and W. B. Rouse, eds., Wiley, New York, 1077–1118.
Hipel, K. W., and McLeod, A. I. (1994). Time series modelling of water resources and environmental systems, Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hipel, K. W., and Obeidi, A. (2005). “Trade versus the environment: Strategic settlement from a systems engineering perspective.” J. Syst. Eng., 8(3), 211–233.
Horsman, S. (2001). “Environmental security in Central Asia.” Russia and Eurasia Programme, Briefing Paper, New Series No. 17, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.
Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of rationality: Theory of metagames and political behaviour, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Howard, N. (1999). Confrontation analysis: How to win operations other than war, CCRP Publications, Pentagon, Washington, D.C.
International Crisis Group (ICG). (2002). “Central Asia: Water and conflict.” ICG Asia Rep. No. 34, Brussels, Belgium.
Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., Fang, L., and Peng, X. (2001). “Coalition analysis in group decision support.” Group Decis. Negotiation, 10(2), 159–175.
Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., and Yin, X. (1997). “Enforcement games in environmental regulation: The case of multiple pollutants.” J. Infrastruct. Plann. Manage., Japan Society of Civil Engineers, No. 562(IV-35), 1–14.
Lewicki, R. J., Litterer, J. A., Minton, J. W., and Saunders, D. M. (1994). Negotiation, 2nd Ed., Irwin, Burr Ridge, Ill.
Li, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., and Hipel, K. W. (2004). “Status quo analysis of the Flathead River conflict.” Water Resour. Res., 40(5), W05S03.
McKinney, D. C. (2003). “Cooperative management of transboundary water resources in Central Asia.” http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/mckinney/aral/CentralAsiaWater_McKinney.pdf .
Micklin, P. (2000). “Managing water in Central Asia.” Russia and Eurasia Programme, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.
Nandalal, K., and Simonovic, S. P. (2003). “Systems analysis methods for resolution of conflicts in water resources management.” State-of-the-Art Rep., Division of Water Resources, United Nations Educational, Science and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Paris.
Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., and Metcalfe, D. (2002). Negotiation analysis: The science and art of collaborative decision making, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Rumer, B. Z. (1989). Soviet central Asia: “A tragic experiment,” Unwin Hyman Inc., Boston.
Seiko, T. S. (1998). “Geographical and socio-economic dimensions of the Aral Sea crisis and their impact on the potential for community action.” J. of Arid Environments, 39(2), 225–238.
Thiessen, E. M., and Loucks, D. P. (1992). “Computer assisted negotiation of multiobjective water resources conflicts.” Water Resour. Bull., 28(1), 163–177.
Vinogradov, S., and Langford, V. P. E. (2001). “Managing transboundary water resources in the Aral Sea Basin: In search of a solution.” Int. J. of Global Environmental Issues, 1(3/4), 345–362.
Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behaviour, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Wang, L., Fang, L., and Hipel, K. W. (2003). “Water allocation: A cooperative game theoretic approach.” J. of Environmental Informatics, 2(2), 11–22.
Wang, L., Fang, L., and Hipel, K. W. (2007). “Mathematical programming approaches for modelling water rights allocation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 133(1), 50–59.
Weinthal, E. (2002). State making and environmental cooperation: Linking domestic and international politics in central Asia, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Wolf, A., ed. (2002). Conflict prevention and resolution in water systems, Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.
Zartman, I. W., ed. (1994). International multilateral negotiations: Approaches to the management of complexity, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 133Issue 4July 2007
Pages: 289 - 299

History

Received: Mar 23, 2004
Accepted: Jun 1, 2006
Published online: Jul 1, 2007
Published in print: Jul 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

K. D. W. Nandalal
Senior Lecturer in Civil Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka.
K. W. Hipel
Professor of Systems Design Engineering, Dept. of Systems Design Engineering and Statistics and Actuarial Science, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo ON, N2L 3G1 Canada.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share