Aquifer Management Zones Based on Simulated Surface-Water Response Functions
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 131, Issue 2
Abstract
Conjunctive management of surface and ground water requires an understanding of the degree to which surface water resources will be impacted by aquifer stresses at different locations. Response functions quantify the rate of depletion or accretion of a surface-water body relative to a unit stress on an aquifer under simplified, but often realistic, conditions. Response functions for four reaches of the Snake River have been determined for each cell of the eastern Snake River Plain aquifer model grid in southern Idaho. Mapping the response functions for each reach creates a visual image of how effects of aquifer stresses at different locations are distributed among the four hydraulically connected river reaches. The mapped distribution of response functions reflects aquifer properties such as the distribution of aquifer transmissivity. Cluster analysis of the response functions for each cell and each river reach has proven useful for subdividing the aquifer into zones for the conjunctive management of ground water and surface water. The response function variance within each zone is minimized in this procedure. In most situations, zone boundaries defined through cluster analysis will likely be modified to better conform to existing political and administrative units. The selection of the number of zones, and the degree to which boundaries based on response functions are modified, reflect a balance between the exactness provided by the science and administrative convenience and efficiency. The approach of managing an aquifer through response function based zones has gained initial acceptance in Idaho, as evidenced by the citation of these zones in Idaho’s draft Water Management Rules. How management zones based on response functions will ultimately be used in Idaho water policy and procedures has not yet been determined.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was performed by the University of Idaho, Idaho Water Resources Research Institute, with funding from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, under the Snake River Resources Review program. The writers would also like to acknowledge the Idaho Department of Water Resources for input and insight into the development of aquifer management zones.
References
Anderson, M. P. , and Woessner, W. W. (1992). Applied groundwater modeling, Academic, San Diego.
Cosgrove, D. M. (2001). “Response functions for the conjunctive management of water in the eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Idaho Library, Moscow, Id.
Cosgrove, D. M., Johnson, G. S., Laney, S., and Lindgren, J. (1999). Description of the IDWR/UI Snake River Plain aquifer model, Idaho Water Resources Research Institute, Moscow, Id.
Ejaz, M. S., and Peralta, R. C. (1995). “Maximizing conjunctive use of surface and ground water under surface water quality constraints.” Adv. Water Resour., 18(2), 67–75.
Fredericks, J. W., Labadie, J. W., and Altenhofen, J. M. (1998). “Decision support system for conjunctive stream-aquifer management.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 124(2), 69–78.
Garabedian, S. P. (1992). “Hydrology and digital simulation of the regional aquifer system, Eastern Snake River Plain, Idaho.” Professional Paper 1408-F, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
Glover, R. E. (1968). “The pumped well.” Technical Bulletin 100, Colorado State University Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, Colo.
Goode, D. J., and Appel, C. A. (1992). “Finite-difference inter-block transmissivity for unconfined aquifers and for aquifers having smoothly varying transmissivity.” Water-Resources Investigations Report 92-4124, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
Hubbell, J. M., Bishop, C. W., Johnson, G. S., and Lucas, J. G. (1997). “Numerical ground-water flow modeling of the Snake River Plain aquifer using the superposition technique.” Ground Water, 35(1), 56–96.
Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR. (1997). Upper Snake River Basin study, Boise, Id.
Illangasekare, T., and Morel-Seytoux, H. J. (1982). “Stream-aquifer influence coefficients as tools for simulation management.” Water Resour. Res., 18(1), 168–176.
Jenkins, C. T. (1968). “Computation of rate and volume of stream depletion by wells.” Techniques of water-resources investigations, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va., 4, D1.
Kjelstrom, L. C. (1995). “Streamflow gains and losses in the Snake River and ground-water budgets for the Snake River Plain, Idaho and Eastern Oregon.” Professional Paper 1408-C, U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
MacDonnell, L. J. (1988). Integrating tributary groundwater development into the prior appropriation system: the South Platte experience, Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, Ft. Collins, Colo.
Maddock, T., III. (1972). “Algebraic technological function from a simulation model.” Water Resour. Res., 8(1), 129–134.
Maddock, T., III, and Lacher, L. J. (1991). MODRSP, a program to calculate drawdown, velocity, storage, and capture response functions for multi-aquifer systems, Dept. of Hydrology and Water Resources, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. (1988). “A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model.” Techniques of water-resources investigations, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va., 6, Al.
Morel-Seytoux, H. J., and Daly, C. J. (1975). “A discrete kernel generator for stream-aquifer studies.” Water Resour. Res., 11(2), 253–260.
Reilly, T. E., Franke, O. L., and Bennett, G. D. (1987). “The principle of superposition and its application in ground-water hydraulics.” Techniques of water-resources investigations, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va., 3, B6.
Spinazola, J. M. (1994). “Geohydrology and simulation of flow and water levels in the Mud Lake area of the Eastern Snake River Plain, eastern Idaho.” Water-Resources Investigations Rep. 93-4227, U.S. Geological Survey, Boise, Id.
SPSS Inc. (1996). SYSTAT 8.0 statistics, Chicago.
Tellman, B. (1996). “Why has integrated management succeeded in some states but not in others.” Water Resources Update Issue No. 106, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, Ill.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 18, 2000
Accepted: Aug 15, 2003
Published online: Mar 1, 2005
Published in print: Mar 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.